农业食品认证计划:如何解决温室气体排放问题?

Emma Keller, Llorenç Milà i Canals, Henry King, Jaquetta Lee, R. Clift
{"title":"农业食品认证计划:如何解决温室气体排放问题?","authors":"Emma Keller, Llorenç Milà i Canals, Henry King, Jaquetta Lee, R. Clift","doi":"10.1080/20430779.2013.840200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of private and voluntary agri-food standards, or certification schemes, has boomed in recent years. Their proliferation and prominence has been fuelled, in part, through wide-scale adoption by agri-food supply chain actors using them to display environmental credentials and to signify that products have been ‘sustainably sourced’. As both a source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and a sector with significant mitigation potential, agriculture has faced increasing pressures to demonstrate GHG emission reductions; it is therefore important to understand whether and how GHGs are addressed within certification schemes. This paper reviews a number of well-known and widely applied certification schemes in the agri-food arena, focussing on several of the certification schemes employed by Unilever and other multi-national companies as part of their commitment to reduce their GHG footprint and source their agricultural raw materials sustainably. A framework is constructed to enable comparison of schemes to elucidate the differences in the range of GHG drivers considered, the type of intervention in which they are addressed and how strictly the GHG relevant requirements are imposed. This should be useful for companies who are embarking on GHG reduction activities and are using agri-food certification schemes as a mechanism to do so.","PeriodicalId":411329,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agri-food certification schemes: how do they address greenhouse gas emissions?\",\"authors\":\"Emma Keller, Llorenç Milà i Canals, Henry King, Jaquetta Lee, R. Clift\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20430779.2013.840200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The number of private and voluntary agri-food standards, or certification schemes, has boomed in recent years. Their proliferation and prominence has been fuelled, in part, through wide-scale adoption by agri-food supply chain actors using them to display environmental credentials and to signify that products have been ‘sustainably sourced’. As both a source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and a sector with significant mitigation potential, agriculture has faced increasing pressures to demonstrate GHG emission reductions; it is therefore important to understand whether and how GHGs are addressed within certification schemes. This paper reviews a number of well-known and widely applied certification schemes in the agri-food arena, focussing on several of the certification schemes employed by Unilever and other multi-national companies as part of their commitment to reduce their GHG footprint and source their agricultural raw materials sustainably. A framework is constructed to enable comparison of schemes to elucidate the differences in the range of GHG drivers considered, the type of intervention in which they are addressed and how strictly the GHG relevant requirements are imposed. This should be useful for companies who are embarking on GHG reduction activities and are using agri-food certification schemes as a mechanism to do so.\",\"PeriodicalId\":411329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2013.840200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2013.840200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

近年来,私人和自愿的农业食品标准或认证计划的数量激增。它们的扩散和突出,在一定程度上是由于农业食品供应链参与者广泛采用它们来展示环境证书,并表明产品是“可持续采购的”。作为温室气体排放的来源和具有重大缓解潜力的部门,农业面临着越来越大的压力,必须证明其减少了温室气体排放;因此,重要的是要了解是否以及如何在认证计划中解决温室气体问题。本文回顾了一些著名的和广泛应用的认证方案,在农业食品领域,集中在几个认证方案采用联合利华和其他跨国公司的一部分,他们的承诺,以减少他们的温室气体足迹和来源农业原材料可持续。构建了一个框架,以便对方案进行比较,以阐明所考虑的温室气体驱动因素范围的差异,解决这些驱动因素的干预类型以及实施温室气体相关要求的严格程度。这对于正在开展温室气体减排活动并将农业食品认证计划作为一种机制的公司应该是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agri-food certification schemes: how do they address greenhouse gas emissions?
The number of private and voluntary agri-food standards, or certification schemes, has boomed in recent years. Their proliferation and prominence has been fuelled, in part, through wide-scale adoption by agri-food supply chain actors using them to display environmental credentials and to signify that products have been ‘sustainably sourced’. As both a source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and a sector with significant mitigation potential, agriculture has faced increasing pressures to demonstrate GHG emission reductions; it is therefore important to understand whether and how GHGs are addressed within certification schemes. This paper reviews a number of well-known and widely applied certification schemes in the agri-food arena, focussing on several of the certification schemes employed by Unilever and other multi-national companies as part of their commitment to reduce their GHG footprint and source their agricultural raw materials sustainably. A framework is constructed to enable comparison of schemes to elucidate the differences in the range of GHG drivers considered, the type of intervention in which they are addressed and how strictly the GHG relevant requirements are imposed. This should be useful for companies who are embarking on GHG reduction activities and are using agri-food certification schemes as a mechanism to do so.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信