评价和行动:改善急性病医院对老年人的护理

A. Jinks, Beverley Tabernacle, C. Kenny
{"title":"评价和行动:改善急性病医院对老年人的护理","authors":"A. Jinks, Beverley Tabernacle, C. Kenny","doi":"10.1002/PDH.269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to share with a wider audience a quality enhancement approach from a nationally funded project which used peer review to benchmark practice standards as a basis for enhancing the care of older people within acute inpatient settings. The study involved the development and implementation of clinical practice review systems, and provision of mentoring, peer review and critical refection for staff nurse and health care assistant grades. A review of the nursing care in 43 ward areas and departments was undertaken, along with analysis of the peer review feedback sheets. Analysis revealed that examples of good practice predominated. There were, however, important areas where practice could be improved. For example, many staff needed to improve their communication skills, and some health care assistant grades needed particularly to improve their patient-centred approaches. It was also found that many staff had unmet educational needs.","PeriodicalId":322010,"journal":{"name":"Practice Development in Health Care","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and action: Improving care for older people in an acute hospital setting\",\"authors\":\"A. Jinks, Beverley Tabernacle, C. Kenny\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/PDH.269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this article is to share with a wider audience a quality enhancement approach from a nationally funded project which used peer review to benchmark practice standards as a basis for enhancing the care of older people within acute inpatient settings. The study involved the development and implementation of clinical practice review systems, and provision of mentoring, peer review and critical refection for staff nurse and health care assistant grades. A review of the nursing care in 43 ward areas and departments was undertaken, along with analysis of the peer review feedback sheets. Analysis revealed that examples of good practice predominated. There were, however, important areas where practice could be improved. For example, many staff needed to improve their communication skills, and some health care assistant grades needed particularly to improve their patient-centred approaches. It was also found that many staff had unmet educational needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practice Development in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practice Development in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/PDH.269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practice Development in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/PDH.269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文的目的是与更广泛的受众分享来自国家资助项目的质量提高方法,该项目使用同行评审基准实践标准作为加强急性住院环境中老年人护理的基础。该研究涉及临床实践审查系统的开发和实施,以及为工作人员护士和卫生保健助理等级提供指导、同行审查和批判性反思。对43个病区和科室的护理情况进行了回顾,并对同行评议反馈表进行了分析。分析表明,良好实践的例子占主导地位。但是,在一些重要的领域可以改进做法。例如,许多工作人员需要提高他们的沟通技巧,一些保健助理职系特别需要改进他们以病人为中心的做法。调查还发现,许多工作人员的教育需要没有得到满足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation and action: Improving care for older people in an acute hospital setting
The aim of this article is to share with a wider audience a quality enhancement approach from a nationally funded project which used peer review to benchmark practice standards as a basis for enhancing the care of older people within acute inpatient settings. The study involved the development and implementation of clinical practice review systems, and provision of mentoring, peer review and critical refection for staff nurse and health care assistant grades. A review of the nursing care in 43 ward areas and departments was undertaken, along with analysis of the peer review feedback sheets. Analysis revealed that examples of good practice predominated. There were, however, important areas where practice could be improved. For example, many staff needed to improve their communication skills, and some health care assistant grades needed particularly to improve their patient-centred approaches. It was also found that many staff had unmet educational needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信