进入者自相残杀和在位者权力:技术和监管对德国xDSL市场的影响

H. Dietl, Remco van der Velden
{"title":"进入者自相残杀和在位者权力:技术和监管对德国xDSL市场的影响","authors":"H. Dietl, Remco van der Velden","doi":"10.3233/IJR-120023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the German DSL (digital subscriber line) markets. Two sub-markets can be differentiated technologically and economically, the market for ADSL (asymmetric digital subscriber line) and the market for SDSL (symmetric digital subscriber line). When both markets came into being in the late nineties, the national regulatory authority, RegTP (Regulation Authority for Telecommunication and Postal Services), tried to provide conditions enabling competition. In 2002, the ADSL market was dominated by a quasi monopoly of the incumbent (Deutsche Telekom, DTAG), while the SDSL market was highly competitive and entrants cannibalized each other in a price war. This paper describes the technological and economic background in order to explain how regulatory measures and incumbent strategies led to the current situation. The DTAG used pricing and various other obstructive measures to erect a quasi ADSL monopoly and to foster entrant cannibalism among SDSL providers. Due to technological complexity and the monopolistic bottleneck character of local loops, RegTP has not been able to implement effective counter measures. The number of xDSL (ADSL and SDSL) providers in Germany will continue to decrease.","PeriodicalId":406236,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Regulation and Governance","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entrant cannibalism and incumbent power: the effects of technology and regulation on German xDSL markets\",\"authors\":\"H. Dietl, Remco van der Velden\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/IJR-120023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the German DSL (digital subscriber line) markets. Two sub-markets can be differentiated technologically and economically, the market for ADSL (asymmetric digital subscriber line) and the market for SDSL (symmetric digital subscriber line). When both markets came into being in the late nineties, the national regulatory authority, RegTP (Regulation Authority for Telecommunication and Postal Services), tried to provide conditions enabling competition. In 2002, the ADSL market was dominated by a quasi monopoly of the incumbent (Deutsche Telekom, DTAG), while the SDSL market was highly competitive and entrants cannibalized each other in a price war. This paper describes the technological and economic background in order to explain how regulatory measures and incumbent strategies led to the current situation. The DTAG used pricing and various other obstructive measures to erect a quasi ADSL monopoly and to foster entrant cannibalism among SDSL providers. Due to technological complexity and the monopolistic bottleneck character of local loops, RegTP has not been able to implement effective counter measures. The number of xDSL (ADSL and SDSL) providers in Germany will continue to decrease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Regulation and Governance\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Regulation and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/IJR-120023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Regulation and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/IJR-120023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文考察了德国DSL(数字用户线路)市场。在技术和经济上可以区分两个子市场,即ADSL(非对称数字用户线路)市场和SDSL(对称数字用户线路)市场。当这两个市场在90年代末形成时,国家监管机构RegTP(电信和邮政服务监管机构)试图提供有利于竞争的条件。2002年,ADSL市场被现任者(德国电信,DTAG)的准垄断所主导,而SDSL市场竞争激烈,进入者在价格战中相互蚕食。本文描述了技术和经济背景,以解释监管措施和现任战略是如何导致现状的。DTAG使用定价和各种其他阻碍措施来建立准ADSL垄断,并在SDSL提供商之间促进进入者自相残杀。由于技术的复杂性和局部环路的垄断性瓶颈特性,RegTP一直未能实施有效的应对措施。德国的xDSL (ADSL和SDSL)提供商的数量将继续减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Entrant cannibalism and incumbent power: the effects of technology and regulation on German xDSL markets
This paper examines the German DSL (digital subscriber line) markets. Two sub-markets can be differentiated technologically and economically, the market for ADSL (asymmetric digital subscriber line) and the market for SDSL (symmetric digital subscriber line). When both markets came into being in the late nineties, the national regulatory authority, RegTP (Regulation Authority for Telecommunication and Postal Services), tried to provide conditions enabling competition. In 2002, the ADSL market was dominated by a quasi monopoly of the incumbent (Deutsche Telekom, DTAG), while the SDSL market was highly competitive and entrants cannibalized each other in a price war. This paper describes the technological and economic background in order to explain how regulatory measures and incumbent strategies led to the current situation. The DTAG used pricing and various other obstructive measures to erect a quasi ADSL monopoly and to foster entrant cannibalism among SDSL providers. Due to technological complexity and the monopolistic bottleneck character of local loops, RegTP has not been able to implement effective counter measures. The number of xDSL (ADSL and SDSL) providers in Germany will continue to decrease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信