第四章:想象一个三角形。什么是专业的专业沟通?

Brenton D. Faber
{"title":"第四章:想象一个三角形。什么是专业的专业沟通?","authors":"Brenton D. Faber","doi":"10.37514/tpc-b.2022.1381.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research into occupational rhetoric has promoted professional communication as an aspirational discourse by conflating occupational and professional forms and activities. As such, professional communication has become a general term that encircles most forms of workplace, business, technical, or organizational communication. Yet, historically, the professions have played an important role in mediating the regulatory and capitalist forces of government and business. Here, professional discourse is not an aggregate or aspirational form of workplace communication but a separate field motivated to promote cognitive concepts associated with health, justice, science, and knowledge and to constrain the excesses of capitalist and regulatory discourses. Conflating professional discourse with business, regulatory, or other forms of workplace communication obscures the conditions, ethics, and intentions that motivate each sector and the real and important tensions between these sectors. Examining professional discourse as a function rather than an occupational status opens up situational research that could investigate specific professional activities within competing discourses. Such moments and spaces could show where and how discourses are deployed as a correction to capitalist or regulatory over-reach. Such a project could investigate how rhetorical agents modulate discourses while retaining and deploying legitimacy, credibility, and the ability to enact social and economic power.","PeriodicalId":176047,"journal":{"name":"Assembling Critical Components: A Framework for Sustaining Technical and Professional Communication","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 4: �Visualize a Triangle.� What�s Professional About Professional Communication?\",\"authors\":\"Brenton D. Faber\",\"doi\":\"10.37514/tpc-b.2022.1381.2.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research into occupational rhetoric has promoted professional communication as an aspirational discourse by conflating occupational and professional forms and activities. As such, professional communication has become a general term that encircles most forms of workplace, business, technical, or organizational communication. Yet, historically, the professions have played an important role in mediating the regulatory and capitalist forces of government and business. Here, professional discourse is not an aggregate or aspirational form of workplace communication but a separate field motivated to promote cognitive concepts associated with health, justice, science, and knowledge and to constrain the excesses of capitalist and regulatory discourses. Conflating professional discourse with business, regulatory, or other forms of workplace communication obscures the conditions, ethics, and intentions that motivate each sector and the real and important tensions between these sectors. Examining professional discourse as a function rather than an occupational status opens up situational research that could investigate specific professional activities within competing discourses. Such moments and spaces could show where and how discourses are deployed as a correction to capitalist or regulatory over-reach. Such a project could investigate how rhetorical agents modulate discourses while retaining and deploying legitimacy, credibility, and the ability to enact social and economic power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assembling Critical Components: A Framework for Sustaining Technical and Professional Communication\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assembling Critical Components: A Framework for Sustaining Technical and Professional Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37514/tpc-b.2022.1381.2.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assembling Critical Components: A Framework for Sustaining Technical and Professional Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/tpc-b.2022.1381.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职业修辞学的研究将职业和专业的形式和活动结合起来,将职业交际作为一种有抱负的话语。因此,专业沟通已经成为一个涵盖大多数工作场所、商业、技术或组织沟通形式的总称。然而,从历史上看,这些职业在调节政府和企业的监管力量和资本主义力量方面发挥了重要作用。在这里,专业话语不是工作场所交流的集合或理想形式,而是一个独立的领域,旨在促进与健康、正义、科学和知识相关的认知概念,并限制资本主义和监管话语的过度行为。将专业话语与商业、监管或其他形式的工作场所沟通混为一谈,模糊了激励每个部门的条件、道德和意图,以及这些部门之间真实而重要的紧张关系。将专业话语作为一种功能而不是职业地位来考察,可以打开情境研究的大门,在竞争话语中调查特定的专业活动。这样的时刻和空间可以显示,作为对资本主义或监管过度的纠正,话语在哪里以及如何被部署。这样一个项目可以研究修辞代理人如何在保持和部署合法性、可信度以及制定社会和经济权力的能力的同时调节话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chapter 4: �Visualize a Triangle.� What�s Professional About Professional Communication?
Research into occupational rhetoric has promoted professional communication as an aspirational discourse by conflating occupational and professional forms and activities. As such, professional communication has become a general term that encircles most forms of workplace, business, technical, or organizational communication. Yet, historically, the professions have played an important role in mediating the regulatory and capitalist forces of government and business. Here, professional discourse is not an aggregate or aspirational form of workplace communication but a separate field motivated to promote cognitive concepts associated with health, justice, science, and knowledge and to constrain the excesses of capitalist and regulatory discourses. Conflating professional discourse with business, regulatory, or other forms of workplace communication obscures the conditions, ethics, and intentions that motivate each sector and the real and important tensions between these sectors. Examining professional discourse as a function rather than an occupational status opens up situational research that could investigate specific professional activities within competing discourses. Such moments and spaces could show where and how discourses are deployed as a correction to capitalist or regulatory over-reach. Such a project could investigate how rhetorical agents modulate discourses while retaining and deploying legitimacy, credibility, and the ability to enact social and economic power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信