布比卡因加咪达唑仑与单独布比卡因用于剖宫产术后镇痛持续时间的比较研究

P. Patole, A. Dawari
{"title":"布比卡因加咪达唑仑与单独布比卡因用于剖宫产术后镇痛持续时间的比较研究","authors":"P. Patole, A. Dawari","doi":"10.26611/101511117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: \"Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage. Inadequate pain control, apart from being inhumane, may result in increased morbidity or mortality. Aims and Objectives: To Study comparison of efficacy of intrathecal bupivacaine plus midazolam vs bupivaine alone for postoperatively analgesia in the patients of caesarean delivery. Methodology: The present study was carried out during period of January 2009 to September 2009. sixty patients of age group 18-40 years were selected for the presented study. Patients undergoing caesarean section as SA grade I and II and not having fetal distress selected for study. Preoperative evaluation of all patients was done. Group A : (n=30) received Inj.Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy 2 ml (10 mg) , Group B : (n=30) received Inj.Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy 2 ml (10 mg) + inj.Midazolam 0.5% , 0.2 ml (1mg) .Pain was accessed by duration of analgesia and VAS-score at 1 hr and 3 hr. The statistical analysis was done by Chi –square test, unpaired t-test calculated by SPSS 19 version software. Results : In our study we have seen that The mean age in group A and Group B was 23.8 ± 3.47 Yrs. and 24±4 comparable (t=0.207,p>0.05).The duration of anesthesia was more in Group B i.e. 88.66± 17.75 as compared to 86±16.15 but the difference was not statistically significant (t=0.608,p>0.05) . The duration of analgesia was more in Group B i.e. 246±39 as compared to 200 ±21 but the difference was not statistically significant (t=0.608,p>0.05) .The doses required for analgesia was less in group A i.e. 2.93±0.630 vs in Group B i.e. 2.96±0.490 but the difference was not statistically significant (t=0.226,p>0.05) .The most of the patients with VAS 2 or 3 were more in Group A as compared to Group B but the difference was not significant (X2 =1.950,p>0.05). The most of the patients with VAS 6,4, 3 or 2 were more in Group A as compared to Group B but the difference was not significant (X2 =2.70 ,p>0.05) Conclusion : It can be concluded from our study that addition of the midazolam improved the duration of analgesia, less VAS score but not significantly differed hence for the definite conclusion further studies with large samples are needed.","PeriodicalId":118187,"journal":{"name":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study of comparison of duration of intrathecal bupivacaine plus midazolam vs bupivaine alone for postoperatively analgesia in the patients of caesarean delivery\",\"authors\":\"P. Patole, A. Dawari\",\"doi\":\"10.26611/101511117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: \\\"Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage. Inadequate pain control, apart from being inhumane, may result in increased morbidity or mortality. Aims and Objectives: To Study comparison of efficacy of intrathecal bupivacaine plus midazolam vs bupivaine alone for postoperatively analgesia in the patients of caesarean delivery. Methodology: The present study was carried out during period of January 2009 to September 2009. sixty patients of age group 18-40 years were selected for the presented study. Patients undergoing caesarean section as SA grade I and II and not having fetal distress selected for study. Preoperative evaluation of all patients was done. Group A : (n=30) received Inj.Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy 2 ml (10 mg) , Group B : (n=30) received Inj.Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy 2 ml (10 mg) + inj.Midazolam 0.5% , 0.2 ml (1mg) .Pain was accessed by duration of analgesia and VAS-score at 1 hr and 3 hr. The statistical analysis was done by Chi –square test, unpaired t-test calculated by SPSS 19 version software. Results : In our study we have seen that The mean age in group A and Group B was 23.8 ± 3.47 Yrs. and 24±4 comparable (t=0.207,p>0.05).The duration of anesthesia was more in Group B i.e. 88.66± 17.75 as compared to 86±16.15 but the difference was not statistically significant (t=0.608,p>0.05) . The duration of analgesia was more in Group B i.e. 246±39 as compared to 200 ±21 but the difference was not statistically significant (t=0.608,p>0.05) .The doses required for analgesia was less in group A i.e. 2.93±0.630 vs in Group B i.e. 2.96±0.490 but the difference was not statistically significant (t=0.226,p>0.05) .The most of the patients with VAS 2 or 3 were more in Group A as compared to Group B but the difference was not significant (X2 =1.950,p>0.05). The most of the patients with VAS 6,4, 3 or 2 were more in Group A as compared to Group B but the difference was not significant (X2 =2.70 ,p>0.05) Conclusion : It can be concluded from our study that addition of the midazolam improved the duration of analgesia, less VAS score but not significantly differed hence for the definite conclusion further studies with large samples are needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26611/101511117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26611/101511117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:“疼痛是一种不愉快的感觉和情感体验,与实际或潜在的组织损伤有关,或者用这种损伤来描述。疼痛控制不充分,除了不人道之外,还可能导致发病率或死亡率增加。目的:比较布比卡因联合咪达唑仑与布比卡因单独应用于剖宫产术后镇痛的疗效。方法:本研究于2009年1月至2009年9月进行。选择年龄在18-40岁的60例患者进行本研究。选择SA分级为I级和II级且无胎儿窘迫的剖宫产患者作为研究对象。术前对所有患者进行评估。A组(n=30)注射Inj。布比卡因0.5%重2ml (10mg), B组(n=30)注射。布比卡因0.5%重2ml (10mg) +注射。咪达唑仑0.5%,0.2 ml (1mg)。通过1小时和3小时的镇痛持续时间和vas评分来评估疼痛。统计学分析采用卡方检验,非配对t检验采用SPSS 19版软件计算。结果:A、B组患者平均年龄23.8±3.47岁。与24±4比较(t=0.207,p>0.05)。B组麻醉时间(88.66±17.75)高于对照组(86±16.15),但差异无统计学意义(t=0.608,p>0.05)。镇痛期间更多的是在B组即246±39 200±21但相比差异无统计学意义(t = 0.608, p > 0.05),所需剂量镇痛在A组即少。在B组即2.93±0.630 vs。2.96±0.490,但差异不显著(t = 0.226, p > 0.05),大多数的患者血管2或3更在A组与B组,但差异不显著(X2 = 1.950, p > 0.05)。VAS 6、4、3、2级患者A组较B组多,但差异无统计学意义(X2 =2.70,p>0.05)。结论:本研究提示咪达唑仑可改善镇痛时间,降低VAS评分,但差异无统计学意义,需进一步大样本研究才能得出明确结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A study of comparison of duration of intrathecal bupivacaine plus midazolam vs bupivaine alone for postoperatively analgesia in the patients of caesarean delivery
Background: "Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage. Inadequate pain control, apart from being inhumane, may result in increased morbidity or mortality. Aims and Objectives: To Study comparison of efficacy of intrathecal bupivacaine plus midazolam vs bupivaine alone for postoperatively analgesia in the patients of caesarean delivery. Methodology: The present study was carried out during period of January 2009 to September 2009. sixty patients of age group 18-40 years were selected for the presented study. Patients undergoing caesarean section as SA grade I and II and not having fetal distress selected for study. Preoperative evaluation of all patients was done. Group A : (n=30) received Inj.Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy 2 ml (10 mg) , Group B : (n=30) received Inj.Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy 2 ml (10 mg) + inj.Midazolam 0.5% , 0.2 ml (1mg) .Pain was accessed by duration of analgesia and VAS-score at 1 hr and 3 hr. The statistical analysis was done by Chi –square test, unpaired t-test calculated by SPSS 19 version software. Results : In our study we have seen that The mean age in group A and Group B was 23.8 ± 3.47 Yrs. and 24±4 comparable (t=0.207,p>0.05).The duration of anesthesia was more in Group B i.e. 88.66± 17.75 as compared to 86±16.15 but the difference was not statistically significant (t=0.608,p>0.05) . The duration of analgesia was more in Group B i.e. 246±39 as compared to 200 ±21 but the difference was not statistically significant (t=0.608,p>0.05) .The doses required for analgesia was less in group A i.e. 2.93±0.630 vs in Group B i.e. 2.96±0.490 but the difference was not statistically significant (t=0.226,p>0.05) .The most of the patients with VAS 2 or 3 were more in Group A as compared to Group B but the difference was not significant (X2 =1.950,p>0.05). The most of the patients with VAS 6,4, 3 or 2 were more in Group A as compared to Group B but the difference was not significant (X2 =2.70 ,p>0.05) Conclusion : It can be concluded from our study that addition of the midazolam improved the duration of analgesia, less VAS score but not significantly differed hence for the definite conclusion further studies with large samples are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信