层次聚类中高尔系数修正的评价

Z. Šulc, Martin Matejka, Jiří Procházka, H. Řezanková
{"title":"层次聚类中高尔系数修正的评价","authors":"Z. Šulc, Martin Matejka, Jiří Procházka, H. Řezanková","doi":"10.51936/eqvy9516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper thoroughly examines three recently introduced modifications of the Gower coefficient, which were determined for data with mixed-type variables in hierarchical clustering. On the contrary to the original Gower coefficient, which only recognizes if two categories match or not in the case of nominal variables, the examined modifications offer three different approaches to measuring the similarity between categories. The examined dissimilarity measures are compared and evaluated regarding the quality of their clusters measured by three internal indices (Dunn, silhouette, McClain) and regarding their classification abilities measured by the Rand index. The comparison is performed on 810 generated datasets. In the analysis, the performance of the similarity measures is evaluated by different data characteristics (the number of variables, the number of categories, the distance of clusters, etc.) and by different hierarchical clustering methods (average, complete, McQuitty and single linkage methods). As a result, two modifications are recommended for the use in practice.","PeriodicalId":242585,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Methodology and Statistics","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Gower coefficient modifications in hierarchical clustering\",\"authors\":\"Z. Šulc, Martin Matejka, Jiří Procházka, H. Řezanková\",\"doi\":\"10.51936/eqvy9516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper thoroughly examines three recently introduced modifications of the Gower coefficient, which were determined for data with mixed-type variables in hierarchical clustering. On the contrary to the original Gower coefficient, which only recognizes if two categories match or not in the case of nominal variables, the examined modifications offer three different approaches to measuring the similarity between categories. The examined dissimilarity measures are compared and evaluated regarding the quality of their clusters measured by three internal indices (Dunn, silhouette, McClain) and regarding their classification abilities measured by the Rand index. The comparison is performed on 810 generated datasets. In the analysis, the performance of the similarity measures is evaluated by different data characteristics (the number of variables, the number of categories, the distance of clusters, etc.) and by different hierarchical clustering methods (average, complete, McQuitty and single linkage methods). As a result, two modifications are recommended for the use in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":242585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Methodology and Statistics\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Methodology and Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51936/eqvy9516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Methodology and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51936/eqvy9516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文深入研究了最近引入的高尔系数的三种修改,这些修改是为分层聚类中具有混合类型变量的数据确定的。与最初的高尔系数相反,它只识别两个类别在名义变量的情况下是否匹配,检验的修改提供了三种不同的方法来衡量类别之间的相似性。通过三个内部指数(Dunn, silhouette, McClain)和Rand指数衡量的分类能力来比较和评估检验的不相似性措施。对810个生成的数据集进行比较。在分析中,通过不同的数据特征(变量数量、类别数量、聚类距离等)和不同的分层聚类方法(平均、完全、McQuitty和单链接方法)来评价相似性度量的性能。因此,建议进行两种修改,以供实际使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Gower coefficient modifications in hierarchical clustering
This paper thoroughly examines three recently introduced modifications of the Gower coefficient, which were determined for data with mixed-type variables in hierarchical clustering. On the contrary to the original Gower coefficient, which only recognizes if two categories match or not in the case of nominal variables, the examined modifications offer three different approaches to measuring the similarity between categories. The examined dissimilarity measures are compared and evaluated regarding the quality of their clusters measured by three internal indices (Dunn, silhouette, McClain) and regarding their classification abilities measured by the Rand index. The comparison is performed on 810 generated datasets. In the analysis, the performance of the similarity measures is evaluated by different data characteristics (the number of variables, the number of categories, the distance of clusters, etc.) and by different hierarchical clustering methods (average, complete, McQuitty and single linkage methods). As a result, two modifications are recommended for the use in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信