{"title":"基于BDD子集的增量CTL模型检验","authors":"Abelardo Pardo, G. Hachtel","doi":"10.1145/277044.277171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An automatic abstraction/refinement algorithm for symbolic CTL model checking is presented. Conservative model checking is thus done for the full CTL language-no restriction is made to the universal or existential fragments. The algorithm begins with conservative verification of an initial abstraction. If the conclusion is negative, it derives a \"goal set\" of states which require further resolution. It then successively refines, with respect to this goal set, the approximations made in the sub-formulas, until the given formula is verified or computational resources are exhausted. This method applies uniformly to the abstractions based in over-approximation as well as under-approximations of the model. Both the refinement and the abstraction procedures are based in BDD-subsetting. Note that refinement procedures which are based on error traces, are limited to over-approximation on the universal fragment (or for language containment), whereas the goal set method is applicable to all consistent approximations, and for all CTL formulas.","PeriodicalId":221221,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1998 Design and Automation Conference. 35th DAC. (Cat. No.98CH36175)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incremental CTL model checking using BDD subsetting\",\"authors\":\"Abelardo Pardo, G. Hachtel\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/277044.277171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An automatic abstraction/refinement algorithm for symbolic CTL model checking is presented. Conservative model checking is thus done for the full CTL language-no restriction is made to the universal or existential fragments. The algorithm begins with conservative verification of an initial abstraction. If the conclusion is negative, it derives a \\\"goal set\\\" of states which require further resolution. It then successively refines, with respect to this goal set, the approximations made in the sub-formulas, until the given formula is verified or computational resources are exhausted. This method applies uniformly to the abstractions based in over-approximation as well as under-approximations of the model. Both the refinement and the abstraction procedures are based in BDD-subsetting. Note that refinement procedures which are based on error traces, are limited to over-approximation on the universal fragment (or for language containment), whereas the goal set method is applicable to all consistent approximations, and for all CTL formulas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 1998 Design and Automation Conference. 35th DAC. (Cat. No.98CH36175)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"47\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 1998 Design and Automation Conference. 35th DAC. (Cat. No.98CH36175)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/277044.277171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1998 Design and Automation Conference. 35th DAC. (Cat. No.98CH36175)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/277044.277171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incremental CTL model checking using BDD subsetting
An automatic abstraction/refinement algorithm for symbolic CTL model checking is presented. Conservative model checking is thus done for the full CTL language-no restriction is made to the universal or existential fragments. The algorithm begins with conservative verification of an initial abstraction. If the conclusion is negative, it derives a "goal set" of states which require further resolution. It then successively refines, with respect to this goal set, the approximations made in the sub-formulas, until the given formula is verified or computational resources are exhausted. This method applies uniformly to the abstractions based in over-approximation as well as under-approximations of the model. Both the refinement and the abstraction procedures are based in BDD-subsetting. Note that refinement procedures which are based on error traces, are limited to over-approximation on the universal fragment (or for language containment), whereas the goal set method is applicable to all consistent approximations, and for all CTL formulas.