物联网设备安全算法性能分析

Nuzhat Khan, N. Sakib, Ismot Jerin, Shaela Quader, Amitabha Chakrabarty
{"title":"物联网设备安全算法性能分析","authors":"Nuzhat Khan, N. Sakib, Ismot Jerin, Shaela Quader, Amitabha Chakrabarty","doi":"10.1109/R10-HTC.2017.8288923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internet of things (IoT) has gained tremendous attention in today's world, IoT ecosystem is growing and showing us a glimpse of how the future will look in the coming days. However, the IoT sector is not impeccable, security is still a threat for the IoT devices as these devices are meant for low power usage for small scale setups. Security algorithms are not abrupt, but many of them don't fit the IoT systems as their compatibility can only rely on products with larger form factor (Which usually means better performance, storage etc.). In this paper, the main concern has been to investigate the performance of different security algorithms and compare them in terms of processing cycle and execution timein Raspberry Pi. The paper has worked with FLECC_IN_C and Crypto++®, two different cryptographic libraries and measured their performance in a constrained environment. It is the first of its kind, to this paper's knowledge, to use raspberry pi which is established as black box device and implemented security algorithms on it. The paper in the end shows a summarised view of several key algorithms and decides which is better in the terms of IoT constraints.","PeriodicalId":411099,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC)","volume":"35 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance analysis of security algorithms for IoT devices\",\"authors\":\"Nuzhat Khan, N. Sakib, Ismot Jerin, Shaela Quader, Amitabha Chakrabarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/R10-HTC.2017.8288923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Internet of things (IoT) has gained tremendous attention in today's world, IoT ecosystem is growing and showing us a glimpse of how the future will look in the coming days. However, the IoT sector is not impeccable, security is still a threat for the IoT devices as these devices are meant for low power usage for small scale setups. Security algorithms are not abrupt, but many of them don't fit the IoT systems as their compatibility can only rely on products with larger form factor (Which usually means better performance, storage etc.). In this paper, the main concern has been to investigate the performance of different security algorithms and compare them in terms of processing cycle and execution timein Raspberry Pi. The paper has worked with FLECC_IN_C and Crypto++®, two different cryptographic libraries and measured their performance in a constrained environment. It is the first of its kind, to this paper's knowledge, to use raspberry pi which is established as black box device and implemented security algorithms on it. The paper in the end shows a summarised view of several key algorithms and decides which is better in the terms of IoT constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":411099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC)\",\"volume\":\"35 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/R10-HTC.2017.8288923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/R10-HTC.2017.8288923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

物联网(IoT)在当今世界受到了极大的关注,物联网生态系统正在发展,并向我们展示了未来的样子。然而,物联网领域并非无懈可击,物联网设备的安全性仍然是一个威胁,因为这些设备用于小规模设置的低功耗。安全算法并不突兀,但其中许多算法并不适合物联网系统,因为它们的兼容性只能依赖于更大尺寸的产品(这通常意味着更好的性能、存储等)。在本文中,主要关注的是研究不同安全算法的性能,并比较它们在树莓派上的处理周期和执行时间。本文使用了FLECC_IN_C和Crypto++®这两种不同的加密库,并在受限环境中测量了它们的性能。据本文所知,这是第一次使用树莓派作为黑盒设备,并在其上实现安全算法。最后,论文总结了几种关键算法,并确定了哪种算法在物联网约束条件下更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance analysis of security algorithms for IoT devices
Internet of things (IoT) has gained tremendous attention in today's world, IoT ecosystem is growing and showing us a glimpse of how the future will look in the coming days. However, the IoT sector is not impeccable, security is still a threat for the IoT devices as these devices are meant for low power usage for small scale setups. Security algorithms are not abrupt, but many of them don't fit the IoT systems as their compatibility can only rely on products with larger form factor (Which usually means better performance, storage etc.). In this paper, the main concern has been to investigate the performance of different security algorithms and compare them in terms of processing cycle and execution timein Raspberry Pi. The paper has worked with FLECC_IN_C and Crypto++®, two different cryptographic libraries and measured their performance in a constrained environment. It is the first of its kind, to this paper's knowledge, to use raspberry pi which is established as black box device and implemented security algorithms on it. The paper in the end shows a summarised view of several key algorithms and decides which is better in the terms of IoT constraints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信