加纳国家语言和扫盲政策与多语制:对基础学校扫盲发展的启示

Abdallah Soma, M. B. Zuberu
{"title":"加纳国家语言和扫盲政策与多语制:对基础学校扫盲发展的启示","authors":"Abdallah Soma, M. B. Zuberu","doi":"10.20431/2347-3134.1001004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper discusses the Ghanaian language policies and multilingualism and their implication for literacy development in Basic Schools in the country. A configurative synthesis approach to Systematic Reviews of secondary qualitative data was used to analyse the influence that Ghana’s current national language and literacy policy has on bilingual or multilingual education and how that translates into literacy instruction in basic schools. It was discovered that, Ghana had several languages and literacy policies over the years with the most recent of them being the National Literacy Acceleration Programme (NALAP) introduced in 2009. This policy advocated for 80% use of local Ghanaian language (L1) for instructional purposes from Kindergarten 1&2 to primary two (P.2) and 50% in primary three (P.3) in addition to the English language (L2). The policy aims at producing bilingual Ghanaian children by the end of P.3. This implies that teachers are supposed to teach children how to read, write and speak in both Ghanaian and English languages and concepts in the various subjects must be taught in Ghanaian language as the main medium of instruction supported by the English language. From primary four (P.4) upwards, the English language becomes the main medium of instruction up to secondary school. This language and literacy policy focuses on only eleven (11) Ghanaian languages out of a total of eight-three (83). The current study then recommends among others that, more Ghanaian languages should be developed into writing forms and adapted for use in education to increase the probability of children being instructed in an L1 that is their mother tongue. Also, for the policy to achieve its aim, learners should be allowed to choose a Ghanaian language as a core subject right from KG to study it up to the tertiary level.","PeriodicalId":137524,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Language and Literacy Policies and Multilingualism in Ghana: Implication for Literacy Development in Basic Schools\",\"authors\":\"Abdallah Soma, M. B. Zuberu\",\"doi\":\"10.20431/2347-3134.1001004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This paper discusses the Ghanaian language policies and multilingualism and their implication for literacy development in Basic Schools in the country. A configurative synthesis approach to Systematic Reviews of secondary qualitative data was used to analyse the influence that Ghana’s current national language and literacy policy has on bilingual or multilingual education and how that translates into literacy instruction in basic schools. It was discovered that, Ghana had several languages and literacy policies over the years with the most recent of them being the National Literacy Acceleration Programme (NALAP) introduced in 2009. This policy advocated for 80% use of local Ghanaian language (L1) for instructional purposes from Kindergarten 1&2 to primary two (P.2) and 50% in primary three (P.3) in addition to the English language (L2). The policy aims at producing bilingual Ghanaian children by the end of P.3. This implies that teachers are supposed to teach children how to read, write and speak in both Ghanaian and English languages and concepts in the various subjects must be taught in Ghanaian language as the main medium of instruction supported by the English language. From primary four (P.4) upwards, the English language becomes the main medium of instruction up to secondary school. This language and literacy policy focuses on only eleven (11) Ghanaian languages out of a total of eight-three (83). The current study then recommends among others that, more Ghanaian languages should be developed into writing forms and adapted for use in education to increase the probability of children being instructed in an L1 that is their mother tongue. Also, for the policy to achieve its aim, learners should be allowed to choose a Ghanaian language as a core subject right from KG to study it up to the tertiary level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.1001004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.1001004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了加纳的语言政策和多语制及其对该国基础学校扫盲发展的影响。采用了对二级定性数据进行系统审查的配置综合方法,分析了加纳目前的国家语言和扫盲政策对双语或多语教育的影响,以及如何将其转化为基础学校的扫盲教学。研究发现,加纳多年来制定了几项语言和扫盲政策,其中最近的一项是2009年推出的国家扫盲加速计划(NALAP)。该政策主张,除了英语(L2)外,从幼儿园一、二年级到小学二年级,80%的教学使用当地加纳语(L1),小学三年级(P.3)使用50%的教学使用当地加纳语(L1)。这项政策的目标是在小学三年级结束时培养出会说两种语言的加纳儿童。这意味着教师应该教孩子们如何用加纳语和英语阅读、写作和说话,各种学科的概念必须用加纳语教授,作为英语支持的主要教学媒介。从小学四年级开始,英语成为主要的教学媒介,一直到中学。这项语言和扫盲政策只关注加纳总共83种语言中的11种语言。目前的研究建议,应将更多的加纳语言发展成书面形式,并改编用于教育,以增加儿童以母语L1进行教学的可能性。此外,为了实现该政策的目标,应该允许学习者从KG开始选择加纳语言作为核心科目,一直学习到高等教育水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National Language and Literacy Policies and Multilingualism in Ghana: Implication for Literacy Development in Basic Schools
: This paper discusses the Ghanaian language policies and multilingualism and their implication for literacy development in Basic Schools in the country. A configurative synthesis approach to Systematic Reviews of secondary qualitative data was used to analyse the influence that Ghana’s current national language and literacy policy has on bilingual or multilingual education and how that translates into literacy instruction in basic schools. It was discovered that, Ghana had several languages and literacy policies over the years with the most recent of them being the National Literacy Acceleration Programme (NALAP) introduced in 2009. This policy advocated for 80% use of local Ghanaian language (L1) for instructional purposes from Kindergarten 1&2 to primary two (P.2) and 50% in primary three (P.3) in addition to the English language (L2). The policy aims at producing bilingual Ghanaian children by the end of P.3. This implies that teachers are supposed to teach children how to read, write and speak in both Ghanaian and English languages and concepts in the various subjects must be taught in Ghanaian language as the main medium of instruction supported by the English language. From primary four (P.4) upwards, the English language becomes the main medium of instruction up to secondary school. This language and literacy policy focuses on only eleven (11) Ghanaian languages out of a total of eight-three (83). The current study then recommends among others that, more Ghanaian languages should be developed into writing forms and adapted for use in education to increase the probability of children being instructed in an L1 that is their mother tongue. Also, for the policy to achieve its aim, learners should be allowed to choose a Ghanaian language as a core subject right from KG to study it up to the tertiary level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信