人们看着他们害怕的物体:通过发出威胁信号的刺激捕捉眼球运动

Tom Nissens, Michel F. Failing, J. Theeuwes
{"title":"人们看着他们害怕的物体:通过发出威胁信号的刺激捕捉眼球运动","authors":"Tom Nissens, Michel F. Failing, J. Theeuwes","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It is known that people covertly attend to threatening stimuli even when it is not beneficial for the task. In the current study we examined whether overt selection is affected by the presence of an object that signals threat. We demonstrate that stimuli that signal the possibility of receiving an electric shock capture the eyes more often than stimuli signalling no shock. Capture occurred even though the threat-signalling stimulus was neither physically salient nor task relevant at any point during the experiment. Crucially, even though fixating the threat-related stimulus made it more likely to receive a shock, results indicate that participants could not help but doing it. Our findings indicate that the presence of a stimulus merely signalling the possibility of receiving a shock is prioritised in selection, and exogenously captures the eyes even when this ultimately results in the execution of the threat (i.e. receiving a shock). Oculomotor capture was particularly pronounced for the fastest saccades which is consistent with the idea that threat influences visual selection at an early stage of processing, when selection is mainly involuntarily.","PeriodicalId":128345,"journal":{"name":"Cognition and Emotion","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat\",\"authors\":\"Tom Nissens, Michel F. Failing, J. Theeuwes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT It is known that people covertly attend to threatening stimuli even when it is not beneficial for the task. In the current study we examined whether overt selection is affected by the presence of an object that signals threat. We demonstrate that stimuli that signal the possibility of receiving an electric shock capture the eyes more often than stimuli signalling no shock. Capture occurred even though the threat-signalling stimulus was neither physically salient nor task relevant at any point during the experiment. Crucially, even though fixating the threat-related stimulus made it more likely to receive a shock, results indicate that participants could not help but doing it. Our findings indicate that the presence of a stimulus merely signalling the possibility of receiving a shock is prioritised in selection, and exogenously captures the eyes even when this ultimately results in the execution of the threat (i.e. receiving a shock). Oculomotor capture was particularly pronounced for the fastest saccades which is consistent with the idea that threat influences visual selection at an early stage of processing, when selection is mainly involuntarily.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition and Emotion\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"56\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition and Emotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition and Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

摘要

摘要:众所周知,即使对任务没有好处,人们也会偷偷地关注威胁性刺激。在当前的研究中,我们考察了外在选择是否会受到带有威胁信号的物体的影响。我们证明,有可能受到电击的刺激比没有电击的刺激更容易吸引眼球。在实验过程中,即使威胁信号刺激在生理上既不显著,也不与任务相关,也会发生捕获。至关重要的是,尽管盯着威胁相关的刺激更有可能受到电击,但结果表明,参与者忍不住要这样做。我们的研究结果表明,刺激的存在仅仅表明了接受电击的可能性,这在选择中是优先考虑的,并且外源性地捕获了眼睛,即使这最终导致了威胁的执行(即接受电击)。眼动捕捉在最快的扫视中尤为明显,这与威胁在加工的早期阶段影响视觉选择的观点是一致的,在这个阶段,选择主要是无意识的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat
ABSTRACT It is known that people covertly attend to threatening stimuli even when it is not beneficial for the task. In the current study we examined whether overt selection is affected by the presence of an object that signals threat. We demonstrate that stimuli that signal the possibility of receiving an electric shock capture the eyes more often than stimuli signalling no shock. Capture occurred even though the threat-signalling stimulus was neither physically salient nor task relevant at any point during the experiment. Crucially, even though fixating the threat-related stimulus made it more likely to receive a shock, results indicate that participants could not help but doing it. Our findings indicate that the presence of a stimulus merely signalling the possibility of receiving a shock is prioritised in selection, and exogenously captures the eyes even when this ultimately results in the execution of the threat (i.e. receiving a shock). Oculomotor capture was particularly pronounced for the fastest saccades which is consistent with the idea that threat influences visual selection at an early stage of processing, when selection is mainly involuntarily.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信