滑移运动优化中的适应度整形

Claudio S. Ravasio, F. Iida, A. Rosendo
{"title":"滑移运动优化中的适应度整形","authors":"Claudio S. Ravasio, F. Iida, A. Rosendo","doi":"10.1109/HUMANOIDS47582.2021.9555784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Walking robots have been a thriving topic for years, and their impact in our future is undeniable. Through different walking techniques machines match their control parameters to environmental conditions, and in both simulation and real-world this control optimization always requires many iterations to find the best parameter. We benchmark four optimization methods and two fitness shaping methods to assess how fast a locomotion model, with two control parameters, can converge to stability. We find that a best overall solution does not exist, with inference-based methods such as Bayesian Optimization in some cases being as inefficient as Random Search. Fitness Shaping using additional information provided by the simulation after termination is shown to improve optimization speed in the presence of running gaits. Additionally, our results validate Bayesian optimization as the fastest optimization method for walking gaits, and present Neural Networks as the fastest for running gaits and. In the presence of so many methods and models, this comparative study aims to clarify the potential gains for optimization methods in bipedal locomotion.","PeriodicalId":320510,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE-RAS 20th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fitness Shaping on SLIP Locomotion Optimization\",\"authors\":\"Claudio S. Ravasio, F. Iida, A. Rosendo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HUMANOIDS47582.2021.9555784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Walking robots have been a thriving topic for years, and their impact in our future is undeniable. Through different walking techniques machines match their control parameters to environmental conditions, and in both simulation and real-world this control optimization always requires many iterations to find the best parameter. We benchmark four optimization methods and two fitness shaping methods to assess how fast a locomotion model, with two control parameters, can converge to stability. We find that a best overall solution does not exist, with inference-based methods such as Bayesian Optimization in some cases being as inefficient as Random Search. Fitness Shaping using additional information provided by the simulation after termination is shown to improve optimization speed in the presence of running gaits. Additionally, our results validate Bayesian optimization as the fastest optimization method for walking gaits, and present Neural Networks as the fastest for running gaits and. In the presence of so many methods and models, this comparative study aims to clarify the potential gains for optimization methods in bipedal locomotion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE-RAS 20th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE-RAS 20th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS47582.2021.9555784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE-RAS 20th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS47582.2021.9555784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

多年来,行走机器人一直是一个热门话题,它们对我们未来的影响是不可否认的。机器人通过不同的行走技术使其控制参数与环境条件相匹配,在仿真和现实世界中,这种控制优化总是需要多次迭代才能找到最佳参数。我们对四种优化方法和两种适应度塑造方法进行了基准测试,以评估具有两个控制参数的运动模型收敛到稳定的速度。我们发现最好的整体解决方案并不存在,在某些情况下,基于推理的方法(如贝叶斯优化)与随机搜索一样低效。在存在跑步步态的情况下,使用终止后仿真提供的附加信息进行适应度整形可以提高优化速度。此外,我们的结果验证了贝叶斯优化是步行步态最快的优化方法,而神经网络是跑步步态和步行步态最快的优化方法。在存在如此多的方法和模型的情况下,本比较研究旨在阐明优化两足运动方法的潜在收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fitness Shaping on SLIP Locomotion Optimization
Walking robots have been a thriving topic for years, and their impact in our future is undeniable. Through different walking techniques machines match their control parameters to environmental conditions, and in both simulation and real-world this control optimization always requires many iterations to find the best parameter. We benchmark four optimization methods and two fitness shaping methods to assess how fast a locomotion model, with two control parameters, can converge to stability. We find that a best overall solution does not exist, with inference-based methods such as Bayesian Optimization in some cases being as inefficient as Random Search. Fitness Shaping using additional information provided by the simulation after termination is shown to improve optimization speed in the presence of running gaits. Additionally, our results validate Bayesian optimization as the fastest optimization method for walking gaits, and present Neural Networks as the fastest for running gaits and. In the presence of so many methods and models, this comparative study aims to clarify the potential gains for optimization methods in bipedal locomotion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信