乳腺实质分析为基础的乳腺癌风险评估选择乳房x线影像

Oscar Araque, María P. Mejía-Sandoval, Antti Sassi, K. Holli-Helenius, A. Lääperi, I. Rinta-Kiikka, O. Arponen, Said Pertuz
{"title":"乳腺实质分析为基础的乳腺癌风险评估选择乳房x线影像","authors":"Oscar Araque, María P. Mejía-Sandoval, Antti Sassi, K. Holli-Helenius, A. Lääperi, I. Rinta-Kiikka, O. Arponen, Said Pertuz","doi":"10.1109/BHI.2019.8834461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mammography is one of the main diagnostic tools for the breast and is increasingly utilized for breast cancer risk assessment. Recently, parenchymal analysis has emerged as a computational tool that works by extracting imaging features from mammograms in order to infer the level of risk of a patient. In standard screening mammography, two views for each breast are obtained: the cranio-caudal (CC) and the medio-lateral oblique (MLO) views. However, to the best of our knowledge, the question of whether the choice of a given view can influence the performance of parenchymal analysis has not been researched in the literature. The aim of this work is to evaluate the utilization of different views for risk estimation based on the computerized analysis of parenchymal patterns in mammography images. We implemented a parenchymal analysis method and tested it on a sample of 228 women in a retrospective case/control study. Based on the obtained results we support the use of the CC view for parenchymal analysis since this reduces computational cost without affecting performance.","PeriodicalId":281971,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical & Health Informatics (BHI)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selecting the Mammographic-View for the Parenchymal Analysis-Based Breast Cancer Risk Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Oscar Araque, María P. Mejía-Sandoval, Antti Sassi, K. Holli-Helenius, A. Lääperi, I. Rinta-Kiikka, O. Arponen, Said Pertuz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BHI.2019.8834461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mammography is one of the main diagnostic tools for the breast and is increasingly utilized for breast cancer risk assessment. Recently, parenchymal analysis has emerged as a computational tool that works by extracting imaging features from mammograms in order to infer the level of risk of a patient. In standard screening mammography, two views for each breast are obtained: the cranio-caudal (CC) and the medio-lateral oblique (MLO) views. However, to the best of our knowledge, the question of whether the choice of a given view can influence the performance of parenchymal analysis has not been researched in the literature. The aim of this work is to evaluate the utilization of different views for risk estimation based on the computerized analysis of parenchymal patterns in mammography images. We implemented a parenchymal analysis method and tested it on a sample of 228 women in a retrospective case/control study. Based on the obtained results we support the use of the CC view for parenchymal analysis since this reduces computational cost without affecting performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical & Health Informatics (BHI)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical & Health Informatics (BHI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BHI.2019.8834461\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical & Health Informatics (BHI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BHI.2019.8834461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

乳房x光检查是乳房的主要诊断工具之一,越来越多地用于乳腺癌风险评估。最近,实质分析作为一种计算工具出现了,它通过从乳房x光片中提取成像特征来推断患者的风险水平。在标准筛查乳房x线摄影中,每个乳房获得两个视图:颅尾侧(CC)视图和中外侧斜位(MLO)视图。然而,据我们所知,一个给定视图的选择是否会影响实质分析的性能的问题还没有在文献中研究过。这项工作的目的是评估基于计算机分析乳房x线摄影图像中的实质模式的不同观点对风险估计的利用。我们实施了实质分析方法,并在回顾性病例/对照研究中对228名女性样本进行了测试。根据获得的结果,我们支持使用CC视图进行实质分析,因为这样可以在不影响性能的情况下降低计算成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selecting the Mammographic-View for the Parenchymal Analysis-Based Breast Cancer Risk Assessment
Mammography is one of the main diagnostic tools for the breast and is increasingly utilized for breast cancer risk assessment. Recently, parenchymal analysis has emerged as a computational tool that works by extracting imaging features from mammograms in order to infer the level of risk of a patient. In standard screening mammography, two views for each breast are obtained: the cranio-caudal (CC) and the medio-lateral oblique (MLO) views. However, to the best of our knowledge, the question of whether the choice of a given view can influence the performance of parenchymal analysis has not been researched in the literature. The aim of this work is to evaluate the utilization of different views for risk estimation based on the computerized analysis of parenchymal patterns in mammography images. We implemented a parenchymal analysis method and tested it on a sample of 228 women in a retrospective case/control study. Based on the obtained results we support the use of the CC view for parenchymal analysis since this reduces computational cost without affecting performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信