宪法视角下的国际组织

B. Frey, Beat Gygi
{"title":"宪法视角下的国际组织","authors":"B. Frey, Beat Gygi","doi":"10.4324/9780429313660-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International governmental organizations arc considered by many in an increasingly interdependent world to be a necessity to which there is no alternative. Dramatic external effects and economies of scale arc seen as forces that require the establishment and further development of administrative units beyond national limits (c.g., Baehr and Gordcnkcr 1984). Accordingly, international organizations arc positively evaluated, and questions of efficiency arc considered unimportant or arc answered in a favorable way for the organizations. Other observers, however, take international organizations to be an extreme example of inefficiency and mismanagement. The UNCTAD, for example, is simply called “a failure” in the study by Ramsay (1984). He points out the many scandals in such organizations and regards UNCTAD’s rapid growth in terms of budgets and number of employees as an indicator of waste. Accordingly, international organizations arc evaluated negatively; it is claimed that there is no need for them and that better alternatives exist. The divergent views start from the same observation, that today international organizations arc of great and increasing importance. There exist about 300 intergovernmental international organizations with roughly 100,000 employees and an administrative budget of about U.S. $7 billion (Blanc 1985). A more extensive definition relying on the Yearbook of International Organizations of 1981 counts between 344 and 1,075 international organizations. They constitute a rather new phenomenon in the international system: 94 percent of the 881 international orga­ nizations whose date of foundation is known were created after 1939 and 70 percent between 1960 and 1981. The establishment rate of The Constitutional Point o f View 59","PeriodicalId":289202,"journal":{"name":"The Political Economy of International Organizations","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Organizations from the Constitutional Point of View\",\"authors\":\"B. Frey, Beat Gygi\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429313660-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"International governmental organizations arc considered by many in an increasingly interdependent world to be a necessity to which there is no alternative. Dramatic external effects and economies of scale arc seen as forces that require the establishment and further development of administrative units beyond national limits (c.g., Baehr and Gordcnkcr 1984). Accordingly, international organizations arc positively evaluated, and questions of efficiency arc considered unimportant or arc answered in a favorable way for the organizations. Other observers, however, take international organizations to be an extreme example of inefficiency and mismanagement. The UNCTAD, for example, is simply called “a failure” in the study by Ramsay (1984). He points out the many scandals in such organizations and regards UNCTAD’s rapid growth in terms of budgets and number of employees as an indicator of waste. Accordingly, international organizations arc evaluated negatively; it is claimed that there is no need for them and that better alternatives exist. The divergent views start from the same observation, that today international organizations arc of great and increasing importance. There exist about 300 intergovernmental international organizations with roughly 100,000 employees and an administrative budget of about U.S. $7 billion (Blanc 1985). A more extensive definition relying on the Yearbook of International Organizations of 1981 counts between 344 and 1,075 international organizations. They constitute a rather new phenomenon in the international system: 94 percent of the 881 international orga­ nizations whose date of foundation is known were created after 1939 and 70 percent between 1960 and 1981. The establishment rate of The Constitutional Point o f View 59\",\"PeriodicalId\":289202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Political Economy of International Organizations\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Political Economy of International Organizations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429313660-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Political Economy of International Organizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429313660-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在一个日益相互依存的世界上,许多人认为国际政府组织是必须的,没有其他选择。戏剧性的外部效应和规模经济被视为需要在国家范围之外建立和进一步发展行政单位的力量(例如,Baehr和Gordcnkcr, 1984)。因此,国际组织得到了积极的评价,效率问题被认为不重要,或者得到了对组织有利的回答。然而,其他观察员认为国际组织是效率低下和管理不善的极端例子。例如,在拉姆齐(1984)的研究中,贸发会议被简单地称为“失败”。他指出了这些组织中的许多丑闻,并认为贸发会议在预算和雇员人数方面的迅速增长是浪费的一个指标。因此,国际组织受到负面评价;有人声称不需要它们,存在更好的替代品。这些不同的观点都是从同一个观点出发的,即今天的国际组织具有巨大和日益重要的意义。目前约有300个政府间国际组织,雇员约10万人,行政预算约70亿美元(Blanc 1985)。根据1981年的《国际组织年鉴》,更广泛的定义是344到1075个国际组织。它们构成了国际体系中的一个相当新的现象:在881个已知成立日期的国际组织中,有94%是在1939年以后成立的,70%是在1960年至1981年之间成立的。宪法观点的建制率59
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Organizations from the Constitutional Point of View
International governmental organizations arc considered by many in an increasingly interdependent world to be a necessity to which there is no alternative. Dramatic external effects and economies of scale arc seen as forces that require the establishment and further development of administrative units beyond national limits (c.g., Baehr and Gordcnkcr 1984). Accordingly, international organizations arc positively evaluated, and questions of efficiency arc considered unimportant or arc answered in a favorable way for the organizations. Other observers, however, take international organizations to be an extreme example of inefficiency and mismanagement. The UNCTAD, for example, is simply called “a failure” in the study by Ramsay (1984). He points out the many scandals in such organizations and regards UNCTAD’s rapid growth in terms of budgets and number of employees as an indicator of waste. Accordingly, international organizations arc evaluated negatively; it is claimed that there is no need for them and that better alternatives exist. The divergent views start from the same observation, that today international organizations arc of great and increasing importance. There exist about 300 intergovernmental international organizations with roughly 100,000 employees and an administrative budget of about U.S. $7 billion (Blanc 1985). A more extensive definition relying on the Yearbook of International Organizations of 1981 counts between 344 and 1,075 international organizations. They constitute a rather new phenomenon in the international system: 94 percent of the 881 international orga­ nizations whose date of foundation is known were created after 1939 and 70 percent between 1960 and 1981. The establishment rate of The Constitutional Point o f View 59
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信