在骨科和神经康复的运动递送中的人体工程学考虑:系统综述

Richmae Menor, D. Manlapaz, Arlene Chiong Maya, Zyra Mae V. Sicat, Audrey Bolintiam, Ira Joy De Guzman, Dean Daniel Duro, Edalrish Panga, J. Ramos, Naomi Sasazawa
{"title":"在骨科和神经康复的运动递送中的人体工程学考虑:系统综述","authors":"Richmae Menor, D. Manlapaz, Arlene Chiong Maya, Zyra Mae V. Sicat, Audrey Bolintiam, Ira Joy De Guzman, Dean Daniel Duro, Edalrish Panga, J. Ramos, Naomi Sasazawa","doi":"10.46409/002.wyuq3588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The lack of protocols and research on this aspect of this effective emerging practice led the researchers to identify the ergonomic considerations in the delivery of exergaming (exercise and gaming) in rehabilitation. \nMethods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in seven electronic databases from July 8 to August 3, 2021. Experimental studies written in English, with randomized controlled trial (RCT) design that included adult participants with orthopedic or neurologic conditions utilizing exergaming to improve balance, muscle strength, or muscle endurance were considered. Two reviewers screened articles through a set inclusion and exclusion criteria using the Rayyan and Mendeley applications. A spreadsheet software was used for the data collection process. The frequency and percentage of the study characteristics, appraisal score, and considerations highlighted, and the nature and type of its controls were obtained. The RCT Critical Appraisal Sheet of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine was used to appraise the included articles. \nResults: A total of 68 studies were included, with 61 (89.71%) reporting safety or health considerations, 36 (52.94%) of which reported ergonomic considerations. Most ergonomic considerations were under the environment control (n = 31, 20.13%), and 13 (8.44%) under the task and 12 (7.79%) the individual controls. \nConclusion and Implications: Ergonomic considerations alongside physical and safety hazard considerations were found in the literature. The review highlights the importance of these considerations as it precludes injury and thus strengthens the effectiveness of the intervention. Further investigation on the correlation of exergaming effectivity and these considerations is warranted.","PeriodicalId":156633,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ergonomic Considerations in Exergaming Delivery in Orthopedic and Neurologic Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Richmae Menor, D. Manlapaz, Arlene Chiong Maya, Zyra Mae V. Sicat, Audrey Bolintiam, Ira Joy De Guzman, Dean Daniel Duro, Edalrish Panga, J. Ramos, Naomi Sasazawa\",\"doi\":\"10.46409/002.wyuq3588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The lack of protocols and research on this aspect of this effective emerging practice led the researchers to identify the ergonomic considerations in the delivery of exergaming (exercise and gaming) in rehabilitation. \\nMethods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in seven electronic databases from July 8 to August 3, 2021. Experimental studies written in English, with randomized controlled trial (RCT) design that included adult participants with orthopedic or neurologic conditions utilizing exergaming to improve balance, muscle strength, or muscle endurance were considered. Two reviewers screened articles through a set inclusion and exclusion criteria using the Rayyan and Mendeley applications. A spreadsheet software was used for the data collection process. The frequency and percentage of the study characteristics, appraisal score, and considerations highlighted, and the nature and type of its controls were obtained. The RCT Critical Appraisal Sheet of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine was used to appraise the included articles. \\nResults: A total of 68 studies were included, with 61 (89.71%) reporting safety or health considerations, 36 (52.94%) of which reported ergonomic considerations. Most ergonomic considerations were under the environment control (n = 31, 20.13%), and 13 (8.44%) under the task and 12 (7.79%) the individual controls. \\nConclusion and Implications: Ergonomic considerations alongside physical and safety hazard considerations were found in the literature. The review highlights the importance of these considerations as it precludes injury and thus strengthens the effectiveness of the intervention. Further investigation on the correlation of exergaming effectivity and these considerations is warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.wyuq3588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.wyuq3588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于缺乏关于这方面有效的新兴实践的协议和研究,研究人员确定了在康复中提供运动(锻炼和游戏)时的人体工程学考虑因素。方法:于2021年7月8日至8月3日在7个电子数据库中进行综合文献检索。实验研究采用英文撰写,随机对照试验(RCT)设计,包括患有骨科或神经疾病的成年参与者,他们利用运动来改善平衡、肌肉力量或肌肉耐力。两位审稿人使用Rayyan和Mendeley应用程序通过一套纳入和排除标准筛选文章。数据收集过程使用电子表格软件。获得了研究特征、评价分数和突出的考虑因素的频率和百分比,以及其控制的性质和类型。采用循证医学中心的RCT关键评价表对纳入的文章进行评价。结果:共纳入68项研究,61项(89.71%)报告了安全或健康方面的考虑,其中36项(52.94%)报告了人体工程学方面的考虑。大多数人体工程学考虑因素在环境控制下(n = 31, 20.13%),在任务控制下(n = 8.44%)和个人控制下(n = 7.79%)有13个(n = 8.44%)。结论和意义:在文献中发现了人体工程学的考虑以及物理和安全危害的考虑。审查强调了这些考虑的重要性,因为它排除了伤害,从而加强了干预的有效性。有必要进一步研究运动效率与这些考虑因素之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ergonomic Considerations in Exergaming Delivery in Orthopedic and Neurologic Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
Aim: The lack of protocols and research on this aspect of this effective emerging practice led the researchers to identify the ergonomic considerations in the delivery of exergaming (exercise and gaming) in rehabilitation. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in seven electronic databases from July 8 to August 3, 2021. Experimental studies written in English, with randomized controlled trial (RCT) design that included adult participants with orthopedic or neurologic conditions utilizing exergaming to improve balance, muscle strength, or muscle endurance were considered. Two reviewers screened articles through a set inclusion and exclusion criteria using the Rayyan and Mendeley applications. A spreadsheet software was used for the data collection process. The frequency and percentage of the study characteristics, appraisal score, and considerations highlighted, and the nature and type of its controls were obtained. The RCT Critical Appraisal Sheet of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine was used to appraise the included articles. Results: A total of 68 studies were included, with 61 (89.71%) reporting safety or health considerations, 36 (52.94%) of which reported ergonomic considerations. Most ergonomic considerations were under the environment control (n = 31, 20.13%), and 13 (8.44%) under the task and 12 (7.79%) the individual controls. Conclusion and Implications: Ergonomic considerations alongside physical and safety hazard considerations were found in the literature. The review highlights the importance of these considerations as it precludes injury and thus strengthens the effectiveness of the intervention. Further investigation on the correlation of exergaming effectivity and these considerations is warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信