{"title":"解析英语和越南语","authors":"N. Duffield","doi":"10.1109/NICS.2018.8606823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Here I outline an alternative approach to two types of minimal contrast in sentence acceptability that have previously been described in terms of abstract formal grammatical mechanisms, namely, that-trace effects in English, and wh-island effects in Vietnamese. This alternative treatment—parsing out—is argued to be preferable to standard analyses, inasmuch as it makes use of independently needed principles to yield equivalent or even superior empirical coverage.","PeriodicalId":137666,"journal":{"name":"2018 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS)","volume":"375 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parsing out in English and Vietnamese\",\"authors\":\"N. Duffield\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NICS.2018.8606823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Here I outline an alternative approach to two types of minimal contrast in sentence acceptability that have previously been described in terms of abstract formal grammatical mechanisms, namely, that-trace effects in English, and wh-island effects in Vietnamese. This alternative treatment—parsing out—is argued to be preferable to standard analyses, inasmuch as it makes use of independently needed principles to yield equivalent or even superior empirical coverage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS)\",\"volume\":\"375 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NICS.2018.8606823\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NICS.2018.8606823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Here I outline an alternative approach to two types of minimal contrast in sentence acceptability that have previously been described in terms of abstract formal grammatical mechanisms, namely, that-trace effects in English, and wh-island effects in Vietnamese. This alternative treatment—parsing out—is argued to be preferable to standard analyses, inasmuch as it makes use of independently needed principles to yield equivalent or even superior empirical coverage.