难治性精神分裂症指南综述:以氯氮平和其他药物治疗策略为重点

Zolezzi M, E. Y, N. M, Abdallah O
{"title":"难治性精神分裂症指南综述:以氯氮平和其他药物治疗策略为重点","authors":"Zolezzi M, E. Y, N. M, Abdallah O","doi":"10.26420/austinjpsychiatrybehavsci.2021.1081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (TRS) represents a significant challenge in mental health provision. Although underused in clinical practice, clozapine remains the treatment of first choice for TRS. This review aims at reviewing clozapine and other treatment options for TRS as recommended in the most recent schizophrenia Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). Methods: A literature search for CPGs was undertaken in four electronic databases, using the terms: ‘schizophrenia’, ‘clozapine’ and ‘guidelines’. Results: Seven schizophrenia CPGs published by national or professional institutions were identified from the period of 2010-2020. The CPGs varied in the scope of the information provided about clozapine’s role in the management of schizophrenia. However, they provided strong supporting evidence on its efficacy in the management of TRS. Main differences in recommendations provided in the schizophrenia CPGs were in relation to the definition of TRS, on the management of patients with TRS who do not respond to clozapine treatment, and on the breath of information in relation to clozapine’s safety profile and monitoring recommendations. Conclusions and Recommendations: Future iteration of schizophrenia CPGs should address these important gaps in information, including strategies to support the safe use of clozapine to decrease treatment delays and reluctance in the use of this effective medication.","PeriodicalId":200970,"journal":{"name":"Austin Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Guideline Review on Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Focus on Clozapine and other Pharmacotherapeutic Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Zolezzi M, E. Y, N. M, Abdallah O\",\"doi\":\"10.26420/austinjpsychiatrybehavsci.2021.1081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (TRS) represents a significant challenge in mental health provision. Although underused in clinical practice, clozapine remains the treatment of first choice for TRS. This review aims at reviewing clozapine and other treatment options for TRS as recommended in the most recent schizophrenia Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). Methods: A literature search for CPGs was undertaken in four electronic databases, using the terms: ‘schizophrenia’, ‘clozapine’ and ‘guidelines’. Results: Seven schizophrenia CPGs published by national or professional institutions were identified from the period of 2010-2020. The CPGs varied in the scope of the information provided about clozapine’s role in the management of schizophrenia. However, they provided strong supporting evidence on its efficacy in the management of TRS. Main differences in recommendations provided in the schizophrenia CPGs were in relation to the definition of TRS, on the management of patients with TRS who do not respond to clozapine treatment, and on the breath of information in relation to clozapine’s safety profile and monitoring recommendations. Conclusions and Recommendations: Future iteration of schizophrenia CPGs should address these important gaps in information, including strategies to support the safe use of clozapine to decrease treatment delays and reluctance in the use of this effective medication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":200970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austin Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austin Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjpsychiatrybehavsci.2021.1081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjpsychiatrybehavsci.2021.1081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:难治性精神分裂症(TRS)是精神卫生服务面临的一个重大挑战。虽然在临床实践中使用不足,氯氮平仍然是TRS的首选治疗方法。本综述旨在回顾最新精神分裂症临床实践指南(CPGs)中推荐的氯氮平和其他TRS治疗方案。方法:使用“精神分裂症”、“氯氮平”和“指南”等术语,在四个电子数据库中检索CPGs的文献。结果:选取2010-2020年国家或专业机构出版的精神分裂症CPGs 7份。CPGs提供的氯氮平在精神分裂症治疗中的作用的信息范围各不相同。然而,他们为其在TRS治疗中的有效性提供了强有力的支持证据。精神分裂症CPGs中提供的建议的主要差异在于TRS的定义,对氯氮平治疗无反应的TRS患者的管理,以及氯氮平安全性和监测建议的相关信息。结论和建议:精神分裂症CPGs的未来迭代应该解决这些重要的信息空白,包括支持氯氮平安全使用的策略,以减少治疗延误和不愿使用这种有效药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Guideline Review on Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Focus on Clozapine and other Pharmacotherapeutic Strategies
Background: Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (TRS) represents a significant challenge in mental health provision. Although underused in clinical practice, clozapine remains the treatment of first choice for TRS. This review aims at reviewing clozapine and other treatment options for TRS as recommended in the most recent schizophrenia Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). Methods: A literature search for CPGs was undertaken in four electronic databases, using the terms: ‘schizophrenia’, ‘clozapine’ and ‘guidelines’. Results: Seven schizophrenia CPGs published by national or professional institutions were identified from the period of 2010-2020. The CPGs varied in the scope of the information provided about clozapine’s role in the management of schizophrenia. However, they provided strong supporting evidence on its efficacy in the management of TRS. Main differences in recommendations provided in the schizophrenia CPGs were in relation to the definition of TRS, on the management of patients with TRS who do not respond to clozapine treatment, and on the breath of information in relation to clozapine’s safety profile and monitoring recommendations. Conclusions and Recommendations: Future iteration of schizophrenia CPGs should address these important gaps in information, including strategies to support the safe use of clozapine to decrease treatment delays and reluctance in the use of this effective medication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信