P. Eberhardt
{"title":"Problematyka narodowościowa Rusi Zakarpackiej","authors":"P. Eberhardt","doi":"10.11649/sn.2011.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nationality Problems of TranscarpathiaThe article discusses ethnic diversity and the changes which took place in Transcarpathia in the 20th century. First, the author presents the historical background for a statistical-demographic analysis. He points to the peripheral location of the region and the fact that it often changed its political affiliation. Thus, for a period of almost a thousand years the province was included within the borders of Hungary; between 1919 and 1939 it became part of Czechoslovakia, and after a four-day long period of independence (14–18 March 1939) it was again incorporated into Hungary between 1939 and 1945. After World War II it was part of a Soviet republic, and since 1991 it has been included in the independent state of Ukraine.Each of these periods brought far-reaching demographic and ethnic consequences. The population of Transcarpathia consisted of Slavic people of Ruthenian origin, mostly Greek Catholics. The inhabitants of the province were subjected to Hungarian, Ukrainian, and Russian influences and believed in different options, such as pro-Ukrainian, pro-Russian, or separatist, i.e. Ruthenian. These issues are discussed in detail in the article and thoroughly interpreted by the author. He also points to the fact that the territory of Transcarpathia was inhabited by numerous ethnic minorities. The Hungarian minority has always been the most important, both in the past and in the present; today it is concentrated in the south of the province. In the past, Jews and Germans also constituted sizeable minorities, while Romanians and Slovaks were always of marginal significance there. The final part of the article presents the scale of the separatist tendencies which may have dangerous political consequences in the future.","PeriodicalId":227603,"journal":{"name":"Sprawy Narodowościowe","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sprawy Narodowościowe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11649/sn.2011.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨喀尔巴阡山脉的民族问题本文论述了跨喀尔巴阡山脉的民族多样性及其在20世纪发生的变化。首先,作者介绍了进行统计人口分析的历史背景。他指出,该地区处于边缘位置,而且经常改变其政治派别。因此,在近一千年的时间里,这个省被包括在匈牙利的边界内;在1919年至1939年期间,它成为捷克斯洛伐克的一部分,经过长达四天的独立(1939年3月14日至18日),它在1939年至1945年期间再次并入匈牙利。第二次世界大战后,它是苏维埃共和国的一部分,自1991年以来,它被纳入独立的乌克兰国家。每一个时期都带来了深远的人口和种族影响。外喀尔巴阡的人口由鲁塞尼亚血统的斯拉夫人组成,主要是希腊天主教徒。该省的居民受到匈牙利、乌克兰和俄罗斯的影响,信仰不同的选择,如亲乌克兰、亲俄罗斯或分离主义,即鲁塞尼亚人。这些问题在文章中进行了详细的讨论,并由作者进行了透彻的解读。他还指出,外喀尔巴阡地区居住着许多少数民族。匈牙利少数民族一直是最重要的,在过去和现在;今天,它集中在该省的南部。过去,犹太人和德国人也构成了相当大的少数民族,而罗马尼亚人和斯洛伐克人在那里一直是无足轻重的。文章的最后一部分介绍了分离主义倾向的规模,这可能在未来产生危险的政治后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problematyka narodowościowa Rusi Zakarpackiej
Nationality Problems of TranscarpathiaThe article discusses ethnic diversity and the changes which took place in Transcarpathia in the 20th century. First, the author presents the historical background for a statistical-demographic analysis. He points to the peripheral location of the region and the fact that it often changed its political affiliation. Thus, for a period of almost a thousand years the province was included within the borders of Hungary; between 1919 and 1939 it became part of Czechoslovakia, and after a four-day long period of independence (14–18 March 1939) it was again incorporated into Hungary between 1939 and 1945. After World War II it was part of a Soviet republic, and since 1991 it has been included in the independent state of Ukraine.Each of these periods brought far-reaching demographic and ethnic consequences. The population of Transcarpathia consisted of Slavic people of Ruthenian origin, mostly Greek Catholics. The inhabitants of the province were subjected to Hungarian, Ukrainian, and Russian influences and believed in different options, such as pro-Ukrainian, pro-Russian, or separatist, i.e. Ruthenian. These issues are discussed in detail in the article and thoroughly interpreted by the author. He also points to the fact that the territory of Transcarpathia was inhabited by numerous ethnic minorities. The Hungarian minority has always been the most important, both in the past and in the present; today it is concentrated in the south of the province. In the past, Jews and Germans also constituted sizeable minorities, while Romanians and Slovaks were always of marginal significance there. The final part of the article presents the scale of the separatist tendencies which may have dangerous political consequences in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信