{"title":"他的父亲是一名律师,母亲是一名律师。艺术只是性的隐喻吗?","authors":"","doi":"10.3406/fdart.1999.1190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"«Is the Art only a Métaphore of the Sex ? » \n Is the Sex only a Happening ? \n The Author, Practician, Freudian, Psycho-analyst, will not bound himself in one School or one Knowledge. He enjoyed, y «Horse ways » to make a Review of some archetypal and fundamental Representations, principally considering the inaugural patterns in which «physis » (the nature, the Sex) enjoin to «morphe » (the Form or the Beauty), and the Fates of the Artist.","PeriodicalId":244856,"journal":{"name":"Figures de l'Art. Revue d'études esthétiques","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sig(is) mund Freud via Leonardo da Vinci. L’art ne serait-il qu’une métaphore du sexe ?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.3406/fdart.1999.1190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"«Is the Art only a Métaphore of the Sex ? » \\n Is the Sex only a Happening ? \\n The Author, Practician, Freudian, Psycho-analyst, will not bound himself in one School or one Knowledge. He enjoyed, y «Horse ways » to make a Review of some archetypal and fundamental Representations, principally considering the inaugural patterns in which «physis » (the nature, the Sex) enjoin to «morphe » (the Form or the Beauty), and the Fates of the Artist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Figures de l'Art. Revue d'études esthétiques\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Figures de l'Art. Revue d'études esthétiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3406/fdart.1999.1190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Figures de l'Art. Revue d'études esthétiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/fdart.1999.1190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sig(is) mund Freud via Leonardo da Vinci. L’art ne serait-il qu’une métaphore du sexe ?
«Is the Art only a Métaphore of the Sex ? »
Is the Sex only a Happening ?
The Author, Practician, Freudian, Psycho-analyst, will not bound himself in one School or one Knowledge. He enjoyed, y «Horse ways » to make a Review of some archetypal and fundamental Representations, principally considering the inaugural patterns in which «physis » (the nature, the Sex) enjoin to «morphe » (the Form or the Beauty), and the Fates of the Artist.