能源公平:用电池储能取代峰值电站

Khoi Vu, Elli Ntakou, Jeffrey Schlegelmilch, Larissa Paredes Muse, R. Fioravanti
{"title":"能源公平:用电池储能取代峰值电站","authors":"Khoi Vu, Elli Ntakou, Jeffrey Schlegelmilch, Larissa Paredes Muse, R. Fioravanti","doi":"10.1109/EESAT55007.2022.9998018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peakers are typically natural gas and oil-fired plants that infrequently run throughout the year to cover peak loads. This paper focuses on close to end-of-life peakers near urban centers and presents an across-the-board comparison of the costs and benefits of replacing the peaker with a battery energy storage device. The paper’s proposition is an expansion of typical benefit-cost analyses that only focus on the plant’s capital and operating costs, including the monetary impacts of zero operational emissions resources on local communities’ health. Our analysis finds that health cost considerations can represent a significant factor in the socioeconomic impact of conventional peakers and that accounting for them can make battery energy storage a viable option for supporting peak loads.","PeriodicalId":310250,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Electrical Energy Storage Application and Technologies Conference (EESAT)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy Equity: Making the Case for Peaker Plant Replacement With Battery Energy Storage\",\"authors\":\"Khoi Vu, Elli Ntakou, Jeffrey Schlegelmilch, Larissa Paredes Muse, R. Fioravanti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EESAT55007.2022.9998018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peakers are typically natural gas and oil-fired plants that infrequently run throughout the year to cover peak loads. This paper focuses on close to end-of-life peakers near urban centers and presents an across-the-board comparison of the costs and benefits of replacing the peaker with a battery energy storage device. The paper’s proposition is an expansion of typical benefit-cost analyses that only focus on the plant’s capital and operating costs, including the monetary impacts of zero operational emissions resources on local communities’ health. Our analysis finds that health cost considerations can represent a significant factor in the socioeconomic impact of conventional peakers and that accounting for them can make battery energy storage a viable option for supporting peak loads.\",\"PeriodicalId\":310250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE Electrical Energy Storage Application and Technologies Conference (EESAT)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE Electrical Energy Storage Application and Technologies Conference (EESAT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EESAT55007.2022.9998018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Electrical Energy Storage Application and Technologies Conference (EESAT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EESAT55007.2022.9998018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

峰值发电厂通常是天然气和燃油发电厂,它们不经常全年运行以满足峰值负荷。本文重点关注城市中心附近接近报废的峰值,并对用电池储能设备替换峰值的成本和收益进行了全面比较。这篇论文的主张是对典型的效益-成本分析的扩展,这种分析只关注电厂的资本和运营成本,包括零运营排放资源对当地社区健康的货币影响。我们的分析发现,健康成本的考虑可以代表传统峰值的社会经济影响的一个重要因素,并且考虑到这些因素可以使电池储能成为支持峰值负荷的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy Equity: Making the Case for Peaker Plant Replacement With Battery Energy Storage
Peakers are typically natural gas and oil-fired plants that infrequently run throughout the year to cover peak loads. This paper focuses on close to end-of-life peakers near urban centers and presents an across-the-board comparison of the costs and benefits of replacing the peaker with a battery energy storage device. The paper’s proposition is an expansion of typical benefit-cost analyses that only focus on the plant’s capital and operating costs, including the monetary impacts of zero operational emissions resources on local communities’ health. Our analysis finds that health cost considerations can represent a significant factor in the socioeconomic impact of conventional peakers and that accounting for them can make battery energy storage a viable option for supporting peak loads.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信