{"title":"通过语言智能教授数学","authors":"Millard R. Mamhot, T. Havranek, Alice A. Mamhot","doi":"10.24203/AJEEL.V2I1.727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is based on a quasiexperiment conducted last SY 2009-2010. From six sections of PreCollege Algebra course offered during first semester in Silliman University, one section was randomly chosen to be taught using verballinguistic approach and another section was chosen as the control. The control section made use of the traditional lecture method. Preests were given to both sections as well as posttests. The topics covered were (a) operations on algebraic expressions, and (b) factoring. There were 37 students in the experimental group and 33 in the control group. After the data had been analyzed using the method of Analysis of Covariance, the computed Fvalue for the pretest is 26.276 with pvalue of 0.00 and the Fvalue for treatment between VerbalLinguistic and Control is 5.817 with pvalue of 0.019. The first pvalue of 0.00 signified that there is a relationship between pretest results and posttest results and hence, the difference in the means between the control and experimental groups is due to teaching methods. The second pvalue of 0.019 on treatment implies that the group that received using the methods of Verballinguistic instruction performed better than those that received using the traditional lecture method.","PeriodicalId":325097,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching Mathematics through VerbalLinguistic Intelligence\",\"authors\":\"Millard R. Mamhot, T. Havranek, Alice A. Mamhot\",\"doi\":\"10.24203/AJEEL.V2I1.727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is based on a quasiexperiment conducted last SY 2009-2010. From six sections of PreCollege Algebra course offered during first semester in Silliman University, one section was randomly chosen to be taught using verballinguistic approach and another section was chosen as the control. The control section made use of the traditional lecture method. Preests were given to both sections as well as posttests. The topics covered were (a) operations on algebraic expressions, and (b) factoring. There were 37 students in the experimental group and 33 in the control group. After the data had been analyzed using the method of Analysis of Covariance, the computed Fvalue for the pretest is 26.276 with pvalue of 0.00 and the Fvalue for treatment between VerbalLinguistic and Control is 5.817 with pvalue of 0.019. The first pvalue of 0.00 signified that there is a relationship between pretest results and posttest results and hence, the difference in the means between the control and experimental groups is due to teaching methods. The second pvalue of 0.019 on treatment implies that the group that received using the methods of Verballinguistic instruction performed better than those that received using the traditional lecture method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24203/AJEEL.V2I1.727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24203/AJEEL.V2I1.727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Teaching Mathematics through VerbalLinguistic Intelligence
This paper is based on a quasiexperiment conducted last SY 2009-2010. From six sections of PreCollege Algebra course offered during first semester in Silliman University, one section was randomly chosen to be taught using verballinguistic approach and another section was chosen as the control. The control section made use of the traditional lecture method. Preests were given to both sections as well as posttests. The topics covered were (a) operations on algebraic expressions, and (b) factoring. There were 37 students in the experimental group and 33 in the control group. After the data had been analyzed using the method of Analysis of Covariance, the computed Fvalue for the pretest is 26.276 with pvalue of 0.00 and the Fvalue for treatment between VerbalLinguistic and Control is 5.817 with pvalue of 0.019. The first pvalue of 0.00 signified that there is a relationship between pretest results and posttest results and hence, the difference in the means between the control and experimental groups is due to teaching methods. The second pvalue of 0.019 on treatment implies that the group that received using the methods of Verballinguistic instruction performed better than those that received using the traditional lecture method.