制作元数据:MusicBrainz的案例

Jess Hemerly
{"title":"制作元数据:MusicBrainz的案例","authors":"Jess Hemerly","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1982823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MusicBrainz is a 'community music metadatabase' and an 'open music encyclopedia' to which users contribute information about artists, releases, tracks, and other aspects of music toward the goal of creating a 'comprehensive music site'. As a peer-produced music metadatabase, MusicBrainz is a constructed cultural commons where users develop and distribute musical knowledge through the community website, an institution that supports and manages the pooling of metadata into a database. Studying how MusicBrainz works and why people contribute builds on a growing body of research that seeks to understand how contributors cooperate to create and sustain constructed cultural commons. Understanding how these projects develop, thrive, and sometimes fail sheds light on potential solutions to collective action problems and other social dilemmas relating to cooperation, specifically in regard to information pools and collective knowledge systems. This case study provides a point of comparison between other constructed cultural commons as well as links between cultural taste, social habits, and peer-production. It also emphasizes the socio-cultural importance of music metadata. This study employed both quantitative and qualitative research methods, beginning with a survey administered to the MusicBrainz community and data scraped from user profiles, followed by observation and qualitative interviews with registered users, called editors. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed and interpreted at the same time. The study sought to answer the following research questions about MusicBrainz: Contribution: Why do people contribute? Who are the MusicBrainz contributors? What characterizes editors’ participation? How is contribution linked to cultural preference? How can one compare contributors’ motivations in MusicBrainz to other constructed cultural commons? Music Information: How does MusicBrainz negotiate guidelines and standards? What is the relationship of MusicBrainz to other music resources? What is the role of metadata in music technology? Findings are split into four categories: Demographics, including information about age, gender, region, and overall editing statistics; How MusicBrainz Works, an overview of the technical components and governance structure; Patterns & Processes, which describes the links between musical taste and contribution, how MusicBrainz serves as a tool for discovery, and the ways editors’ decisions mimic those made by information professionals; and Attitude & Motivation, which examines intrinsic and extrinsic motivations that drive users to contribute, from their belief in the philosophy of open source to a compulsion for accuracy and consistency.","PeriodicalId":153695,"journal":{"name":"Cognition in Mathematics","volume":"360 15","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making Metadata: The Case of MusicBrainz\",\"authors\":\"Jess Hemerly\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1982823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"MusicBrainz is a 'community music metadatabase' and an 'open music encyclopedia' to which users contribute information about artists, releases, tracks, and other aspects of music toward the goal of creating a 'comprehensive music site'. As a peer-produced music metadatabase, MusicBrainz is a constructed cultural commons where users develop and distribute musical knowledge through the community website, an institution that supports and manages the pooling of metadata into a database. Studying how MusicBrainz works and why people contribute builds on a growing body of research that seeks to understand how contributors cooperate to create and sustain constructed cultural commons. Understanding how these projects develop, thrive, and sometimes fail sheds light on potential solutions to collective action problems and other social dilemmas relating to cooperation, specifically in regard to information pools and collective knowledge systems. This case study provides a point of comparison between other constructed cultural commons as well as links between cultural taste, social habits, and peer-production. It also emphasizes the socio-cultural importance of music metadata. This study employed both quantitative and qualitative research methods, beginning with a survey administered to the MusicBrainz community and data scraped from user profiles, followed by observation and qualitative interviews with registered users, called editors. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed and interpreted at the same time. The study sought to answer the following research questions about MusicBrainz: Contribution: Why do people contribute? Who are the MusicBrainz contributors? What characterizes editors’ participation? How is contribution linked to cultural preference? How can one compare contributors’ motivations in MusicBrainz to other constructed cultural commons? Music Information: How does MusicBrainz negotiate guidelines and standards? What is the relationship of MusicBrainz to other music resources? What is the role of metadata in music technology? Findings are split into four categories: Demographics, including information about age, gender, region, and overall editing statistics; How MusicBrainz Works, an overview of the technical components and governance structure; Patterns & Processes, which describes the links between musical taste and contribution, how MusicBrainz serves as a tool for discovery, and the ways editors’ decisions mimic those made by information professionals; and Attitude & Motivation, which examines intrinsic and extrinsic motivations that drive users to contribute, from their belief in the philosophy of open source to a compulsion for accuracy and consistency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition in Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"360 15\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition in Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1982823\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition in Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1982823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

MusicBrainz是一个“社区音乐元数据库”和“开放音乐百科全书”,用户可以向它提供有关艺术家、发行版本、曲目和其他音乐方面的信息,目的是创建一个“综合音乐网站”。作为一个同行制作的音乐元数据库,MusicBrainz是一个构建的文化公共场所,用户可以通过社区网站开发和分发音乐知识,这是一个支持和管理元数据池进入数据库的机构。研究MusicBrainz是如何运作的,以及人们为什么会做出贡献,建立在一个不断增长的研究体系的基础上,该研究旨在了解贡献者如何合作创造和维持已构建的文化公地。了解这些项目的发展、繁荣和有时失败的过程,有助于我们找到解决集体行动问题和其他与合作有关的社会困境的潜在办法,特别是在信息池和集体知识系统方面。本案例研究提供了其他构建的文化公地之间的比较点,以及文化品味、社会习惯和同侪生产之间的联系。它还强调了音乐元数据的社会文化重要性。本研究采用定量和定性研究方法,首先对MusicBrainz社区进行调查,并从用户档案中收集数据,然后对注册用户(称为编辑)进行观察和定性访谈。同时对定性和定量数据进行分析和解释。该研究试图回答以下关于MusicBrainz的研究问题:贡献:人们为什么要贡献?谁是MusicBrainz的贡献者?编辑参与的特点是什么?贡献是如何与文化偏好联系起来的?人们如何将MusicBrainz中贡献者的动机与其他构建的文化公地进行比较?音乐资讯:MusicBrainz如何协商指导方针和标准?MusicBrainz与其他音乐资源的关系是什么?元数据在音乐技术中的作用是什么?调查结果分为四类:人口统计,包括年龄、性别、地区和总体编辑统计信息;MusicBrainz是如何工作的,概述了技术组件和治理结构;模式与过程,描述了音乐品味与贡献之间的联系,MusicBrainz如何作为发现工具,以及编辑的决定如何模仿信息专业人员的决定;态度与动机(Attitude & Motivation),研究驱动用户做出贡献的内在和外在动机,从他们对开源哲学的信念到对准确性和一致性的强制要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Making Metadata: The Case of MusicBrainz
MusicBrainz is a 'community music metadatabase' and an 'open music encyclopedia' to which users contribute information about artists, releases, tracks, and other aspects of music toward the goal of creating a 'comprehensive music site'. As a peer-produced music metadatabase, MusicBrainz is a constructed cultural commons where users develop and distribute musical knowledge through the community website, an institution that supports and manages the pooling of metadata into a database. Studying how MusicBrainz works and why people contribute builds on a growing body of research that seeks to understand how contributors cooperate to create and sustain constructed cultural commons. Understanding how these projects develop, thrive, and sometimes fail sheds light on potential solutions to collective action problems and other social dilemmas relating to cooperation, specifically in regard to information pools and collective knowledge systems. This case study provides a point of comparison between other constructed cultural commons as well as links between cultural taste, social habits, and peer-production. It also emphasizes the socio-cultural importance of music metadata. This study employed both quantitative and qualitative research methods, beginning with a survey administered to the MusicBrainz community and data scraped from user profiles, followed by observation and qualitative interviews with registered users, called editors. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed and interpreted at the same time. The study sought to answer the following research questions about MusicBrainz: Contribution: Why do people contribute? Who are the MusicBrainz contributors? What characterizes editors’ participation? How is contribution linked to cultural preference? How can one compare contributors’ motivations in MusicBrainz to other constructed cultural commons? Music Information: How does MusicBrainz negotiate guidelines and standards? What is the relationship of MusicBrainz to other music resources? What is the role of metadata in music technology? Findings are split into four categories: Demographics, including information about age, gender, region, and overall editing statistics; How MusicBrainz Works, an overview of the technical components and governance structure; Patterns & Processes, which describes the links between musical taste and contribution, how MusicBrainz serves as a tool for discovery, and the ways editors’ decisions mimic those made by information professionals; and Attitude & Motivation, which examines intrinsic and extrinsic motivations that drive users to contribute, from their belief in the philosophy of open source to a compulsion for accuracy and consistency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信