在小儿头部 CT 扫描过程中,不同导管电压下扫描范围内不包括透镜的上眶线的实用性

{"title":"在小儿头部 CT 扫描过程中,不同导管电压下扫描范围内不包括透镜的上眶线的实用性","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rxeng.2023.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>To compare the real time skin dosimeter values at lens between with the lens included in the scan range (orbitomeatal base line [OML]) or without the lens included in the scan range (superior orbitomeatal line [SOML]) at different tube voltages.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div><span>We used three pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms with a 64 detector-row </span>computed tomography (CT) scanner with the OML- or SOML-protocol at different tube voltages during the head CT. A real time skin dosimeter was inserted into the phantom center of the head, and surfaces of the lens. We compared the real time skin dosimeter values at lens between the OML- and SOML-protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no significant differences in the real time skin dosimeter values for the head in the scan area for each phantom at different tube voltages between the OML- and SOML-protocol (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05 for all phantom). Compared with the OML protocol, it is possible to reduce the real time skin dosimeter values at lens by approximately 80% by using the SOML protocol (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) at all tube voltages. Compared with the OML protocol, it is possible to reduce the real time skin dosimeter values at mammary gland by approximately 20% by using the SOML protocol (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) at all tube voltages.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>During the pediatric head CT examination, SOML protocol was possible to reduce the real time skin dosimeter values at lens by approximately 80% compared with OML protocol at all tube voltages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94185,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of the superior orbitomeatal line without the lens included in the scan range at different tube voltage during pediatric head CT\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rxeng.2023.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>To compare the real time skin dosimeter values at lens between with the lens included in the scan range (orbitomeatal base line [OML]) or without the lens included in the scan range (superior orbitomeatal line [SOML]) at different tube voltages.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div><span>We used three pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms with a 64 detector-row </span>computed tomography (CT) scanner with the OML- or SOML-protocol at different tube voltages during the head CT. A real time skin dosimeter was inserted into the phantom center of the head, and surfaces of the lens. We compared the real time skin dosimeter values at lens between the OML- and SOML-protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no significant differences in the real time skin dosimeter values for the head in the scan area for each phantom at different tube voltages between the OML- and SOML-protocol (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05 for all phantom). Compared with the OML protocol, it is possible to reduce the real time skin dosimeter values at lens by approximately 80% by using the SOML protocol (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) at all tube voltages. Compared with the OML protocol, it is possible to reduce the real time skin dosimeter values at mammary gland by approximately 20% by using the SOML protocol (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) at all tube voltages.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>During the pediatric head CT examination, SOML protocol was possible to reduce the real time skin dosimeter values at lens by approximately 80% compared with OML protocol at all tube voltages.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173510723000708\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173510723000708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料和方法 我们使用三个小儿拟人化模型,在头部 CT 扫描过程中使用 64 个探测器排的计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描仪,在不同管电压下采用 OML 或 SOML 方案。将实时皮肤剂量计插入模型的头部中心和透镜表面。我们比较了 OML 方案和 SOML 方案下透镜处的实时皮肤剂量计值。结果 OML 方案和 SOML 方案下,不同管电压下每个模型扫描区域的头部实时皮肤剂量计值没有显著差异(所有模型的 p 均为 0.05)。与 OML 方案相比,使用 SOML 方案(p <0.05),在所有试管电压下,透镜处的皮肤剂量计实时值可减少约 80%。与 OML 方案相比,在所有管电压下使用 SOML 方案(p < 0.05)可将乳腺处的实时皮肤剂量计值降低约 20%。结论在小儿头部 CT 检查中,与 OML 方案相比,在所有管电压下使用 SOML 方案可将透镜处的实时皮肤剂量计值降低约 80%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usefulness of the superior orbitomeatal line without the lens included in the scan range at different tube voltage during pediatric head CT

Introduction and objectives

To compare the real time skin dosimeter values at lens between with the lens included in the scan range (orbitomeatal base line [OML]) or without the lens included in the scan range (superior orbitomeatal line [SOML]) at different tube voltages.

Materials and methods

We used three pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms with a 64 detector-row computed tomography (CT) scanner with the OML- or SOML-protocol at different tube voltages during the head CT. A real time skin dosimeter was inserted into the phantom center of the head, and surfaces of the lens. We compared the real time skin dosimeter values at lens between the OML- and SOML-protocol.

Results

There were no significant differences in the real time skin dosimeter values for the head in the scan area for each phantom at different tube voltages between the OML- and SOML-protocol (p > 0.05 for all phantom). Compared with the OML protocol, it is possible to reduce the real time skin dosimeter values at lens by approximately 80% by using the SOML protocol (p < 0.05) at all tube voltages. Compared with the OML protocol, it is possible to reduce the real time skin dosimeter values at mammary gland by approximately 20% by using the SOML protocol (p < 0.05) at all tube voltages.

Conclusions

During the pediatric head CT examination, SOML protocol was possible to reduce the real time skin dosimeter values at lens by approximately 80% compared with OML protocol at all tube voltages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信