{"title":"热压技术与CAD/CAM系统制备陶瓷镶嵌体修复体配合度的比较研究","authors":"Merve Benli","doi":"10.32677/EJMS.2018.V03.I03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of a lithium disilicate inlays fabricated by two CAD/CAM systems (extra-oral and intra-oral scanning), and conventional heat-press technique. Materials and methods: Mandibular first molars were used for inlay restorations in a typodont model. Three groups (n=12 each) of inlays were fabricated by Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology using intraoral and extraoral scanning devices, and conventional heat-press method. Replica technique was used to assess the discrepancies. Internal and marginal gaps were measured at 4 points on each side with stereomicroscope at 200x magnification. One-way variance analysis test (ANOVA) and paired-samples t-test were used for analyzing the results. Results: The fit values were statistically significantly influenced by the production method in total discrepancy comparisons (p= .000). Intraoral scanner group demonstrated the lowest marginal and internal gap values whereas conventional heat-press group showed the highest results. Statistically significant differences were found for fit values with respect to the groups (p<.001). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, restorations fabricated via complete digital workflow demonstrated better marginal and internal accuracy than silicone impressions with conventional heat-press technique.","PeriodicalId":363370,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of the fit of ceramic inlay restorations fabricated with heat-press technique and CAD/CAM systems: A preliminary study\",\"authors\":\"Merve Benli\",\"doi\":\"10.32677/EJMS.2018.V03.I03.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of a lithium disilicate inlays fabricated by two CAD/CAM systems (extra-oral and intra-oral scanning), and conventional heat-press technique. Materials and methods: Mandibular first molars were used for inlay restorations in a typodont model. Three groups (n=12 each) of inlays were fabricated by Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology using intraoral and extraoral scanning devices, and conventional heat-press method. Replica technique was used to assess the discrepancies. Internal and marginal gaps were measured at 4 points on each side with stereomicroscope at 200x magnification. One-way variance analysis test (ANOVA) and paired-samples t-test were used for analyzing the results. Results: The fit values were statistically significantly influenced by the production method in total discrepancy comparisons (p= .000). Intraoral scanner group demonstrated the lowest marginal and internal gap values whereas conventional heat-press group showed the highest results. Statistically significant differences were found for fit values with respect to the groups (p<.001). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, restorations fabricated via complete digital workflow demonstrated better marginal and internal accuracy than silicone impressions with conventional heat-press technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":363370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eastern Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eastern Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32677/EJMS.2018.V03.I03.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32677/EJMS.2018.V03.I03.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative evaluation of the fit of ceramic inlay restorations fabricated with heat-press technique and CAD/CAM systems: A preliminary study
Objective: The objective of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of a lithium disilicate inlays fabricated by two CAD/CAM systems (extra-oral and intra-oral scanning), and conventional heat-press technique. Materials and methods: Mandibular first molars were used for inlay restorations in a typodont model. Three groups (n=12 each) of inlays were fabricated by Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology using intraoral and extraoral scanning devices, and conventional heat-press method. Replica technique was used to assess the discrepancies. Internal and marginal gaps were measured at 4 points on each side with stereomicroscope at 200x magnification. One-way variance analysis test (ANOVA) and paired-samples t-test were used for analyzing the results. Results: The fit values were statistically significantly influenced by the production method in total discrepancy comparisons (p= .000). Intraoral scanner group demonstrated the lowest marginal and internal gap values whereas conventional heat-press group showed the highest results. Statistically significant differences were found for fit values with respect to the groups (p<.001). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, restorations fabricated via complete digital workflow demonstrated better marginal and internal accuracy than silicone impressions with conventional heat-press technique.