Daniel Špelda
{"title":"Huygens a Fontenelle o mimozemšťanech a lidech","authors":"Daniel Špelda","doi":"10.46938/tv.2017.385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with selected aspects of two well-known publications on the multiplicity of worlds and extraterrestrial life that emerged at the end of the 17th century. These are Entretiens sur la pluralité des mondes (1686) by Bernard de Fontenelle and Cosmotheoros (1698) by Christiaan Huygens. In the first part, the article focuses primarily on how both authors understand the position of man in an inhabited and unbounded universe. Fontenelle and Huygens provide in their texts a convincing refutation of the often repeated notion that the idea of the infinite universe awakened terror and fears in early modern intellectuals. Actually, for them, the unbounded universe meant a celebration of reason that is able to emancipate itself from a geocentric superstition and anthropocentrism. At the same time, in the spirit of the early Enlightenment, it was also a celebration of the cosmic universality of reason. In its second part, the article deals with so-called cognitive passions: especially with fear, amazement and curiosity. The analysis of Huygens’ and Fontenelles’ works confirms and deepens some points of Lorraine Daston’s research. It turns out that at the end of the 17th century, fear and admiration were clearly understood as manifestations of ignorance and backwardness, although in the previous philosophical tradition they were associated with piety and the beginning of philosophy. Compared to it, traditionally condemned curiosity has become a legitimate, even desirable, characteristics of a true scientist.","PeriodicalId":349992,"journal":{"name":"Teorie vědy / Theory of Science","volume":"7 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teorie vědy / Theory of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2017.385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章涉及17世纪末出现的关于世界多样性和地外生命的两份著名出版物的某些方面。这两本书分别是伯纳德·德·丰特奈尔的《世界多元主义的探索》(1686)和克里斯蒂安·惠更斯的《宇宙理论》(1698)。在第一部分中,文章主要关注两位作者如何理解人类在一个有人居住的无界宇宙中的地位。丰特奈尔和惠更斯在他们的著作中提供了一个令人信服的反驳,驳斥了一个经常被重复的观念,即无限宇宙的想法唤醒了早期现代知识分子的恐惧和恐惧。实际上,对他们来说,无界的宇宙意味着对理性的庆祝,它能够将自己从地心说的迷信和人类中心主义中解放出来。与此同时,在早期启蒙运动的精神中,它也是对宇宙理性普遍性的庆祝。在第二部分,文章讨论了所谓的认知激情:特别是恐惧、惊奇和好奇。对惠更斯和丰特内莱斯作品的分析证实并深化了达斯顿的一些研究观点。事实证明,在17世纪末,恐惧和钦佩被清楚地理解为无知和落后的表现,尽管在之前的哲学传统中,它们与虔诚和哲学的起源有关。与之相比,传统上被谴责的好奇心已经成为一个真正的科学家的合法的,甚至是可取的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Huygens a Fontenelle o mimozemšťanech a lidech
The article deals with selected aspects of two well-known publications on the multiplicity of worlds and extraterrestrial life that emerged at the end of the 17th century. These are Entretiens sur la pluralité des mondes (1686) by Bernard de Fontenelle and Cosmotheoros (1698) by Christiaan Huygens. In the first part, the article focuses primarily on how both authors understand the position of man in an inhabited and unbounded universe. Fontenelle and Huygens provide in their texts a convincing refutation of the often repeated notion that the idea of the infinite universe awakened terror and fears in early modern intellectuals. Actually, for them, the unbounded universe meant a celebration of reason that is able to emancipate itself from a geocentric superstition and anthropocentrism. At the same time, in the spirit of the early Enlightenment, it was also a celebration of the cosmic universality of reason. In its second part, the article deals with so-called cognitive passions: especially with fear, amazement and curiosity. The analysis of Huygens’ and Fontenelles’ works confirms and deepens some points of Lorraine Daston’s research. It turns out that at the end of the 17th century, fear and admiration were clearly understood as manifestations of ignorance and backwardness, although in the previous philosophical tradition they were associated with piety and the beginning of philosophy. Compared to it, traditionally condemned curiosity has become a legitimate, even desirable, characteristics of a true scientist.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信