数字化时代的民事司法应有通知

Y. Lukonina
{"title":"数字化时代的民事司法应有通知","authors":"Y. Lukonina","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2022-1-32-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article raises the problem of notifying the participants in the civil procedure. The analysis is carried out on the institution of notification of persons participating in the case, through the prism of digitalization of the administration of justice in civil cases. The author examines the nature of the judicial notice, defining the conditions for the recognition of the notice as appropriate. The comparative legal method of scientific knowledge makes it possible to draw a parallel with the arbitration process and identify gaps in the legal regulation of the definition of proper notification in the civil procedural legislation. As digital configurations of judicial notice, the author provides examples of notification by means of SMS messages, as well as using the functionality of the courts’ official websites on the Internet and e-mail. The conditions for the recognition of such methods as appropriate are considered. The dialectic of digitalization of judicial notice in Russia is traced. For comparison, it is used the experience of foreign countries (Italy, South Korea, Great Britain). Based on the results obtained, taking into account innovations in the field of personal identification in the information and communication network Internet, it is determined a new method of notifying persons participating in the case using instant messengers. The author investigates the possibility of recognizing this method as appropriate, points out the merits of its use and the rationality of its recognition as an acceptable means of communication on the part of the judicial system.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Due Notification in the Era of Digitalization of Justice in Civil Cases\",\"authors\":\"Y. Lukonina\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/2072-3636-2022-1-32-34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article raises the problem of notifying the participants in the civil procedure. The analysis is carried out on the institution of notification of persons participating in the case, through the prism of digitalization of the administration of justice in civil cases. The author examines the nature of the judicial notice, defining the conditions for the recognition of the notice as appropriate. The comparative legal method of scientific knowledge makes it possible to draw a parallel with the arbitration process and identify gaps in the legal regulation of the definition of proper notification in the civil procedural legislation. As digital configurations of judicial notice, the author provides examples of notification by means of SMS messages, as well as using the functionality of the courts’ official websites on the Internet and e-mail. The conditions for the recognition of such methods as appropriate are considered. The dialectic of digitalization of judicial notice in Russia is traced. For comparison, it is used the experience of foreign countries (Italy, South Korea, Great Britain). Based on the results obtained, taking into account innovations in the field of personal identification in the information and communication network Internet, it is determined a new method of notifying persons participating in the case using instant messengers. The author investigates the possibility of recognizing this method as appropriate, points out the merits of its use and the rationality of its recognition as an acceptable means of communication on the part of the judicial system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Court administrator\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Court administrator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2022-1-32-34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Court administrator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2022-1-32-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章提出了民事诉讼参与人的通知问题。本文从民事司法数字化的角度,对案件参与人通知制度进行了分析。作者考察了司法通知的性质,适当地界定了承认司法通知的条件。科学知识的比较法可以与仲裁程序进行比较,并找出民事诉讼立法中适当通知定义的法律规定的空白。作为司法通知的数字化配置,作者举例说明了通过短信、利用互联网上法院官方网站和电子邮件的功能进行通知的方式。考虑了适当承认这些方法的条件。追溯了俄罗斯司法通知数字化的辩证法。为了进行比较,借鉴了国外(意大利、韩国、英国)的经验。在此基础上,考虑到信息通信网络互联网中个人身份识别领域的创新,确定了一种利用即时通讯工具通知涉案人员的新方法。作者探讨了承认这种方法为适当的可能性,指出了其使用的优点以及司法系统承认其为一种可接受的沟通手段的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Due Notification in the Era of Digitalization of Justice in Civil Cases
The article raises the problem of notifying the participants in the civil procedure. The analysis is carried out on the institution of notification of persons participating in the case, through the prism of digitalization of the administration of justice in civil cases. The author examines the nature of the judicial notice, defining the conditions for the recognition of the notice as appropriate. The comparative legal method of scientific knowledge makes it possible to draw a parallel with the arbitration process and identify gaps in the legal regulation of the definition of proper notification in the civil procedural legislation. As digital configurations of judicial notice, the author provides examples of notification by means of SMS messages, as well as using the functionality of the courts’ official websites on the Internet and e-mail. The conditions for the recognition of such methods as appropriate are considered. The dialectic of digitalization of judicial notice in Russia is traced. For comparison, it is used the experience of foreign countries (Italy, South Korea, Great Britain). Based on the results obtained, taking into account innovations in the field of personal identification in the information and communication network Internet, it is determined a new method of notifying persons participating in the case using instant messengers. The author investigates the possibility of recognizing this method as appropriate, points out the merits of its use and the rationality of its recognition as an acceptable means of communication on the part of the judicial system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信