合理防范定时攻击

Goran Doychev, Boris Köpf
{"title":"合理防范定时攻击","authors":"Goran Doychev, Boris Köpf","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2015.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Timing attacks can effectively recover keys from cryptosystems. While they can be defeated using constant-time implementations, this defensive approach comes at the price of a performance penalty. One is hence faced with the problem of striking a balance between performance and security against timing attacks. In this paper, we propose a systematic approach for determining the optimal protection against timing attacks, on the example of cryptosystems based on discrete logarithms. Our model includes a resource-bounded timing adversary who strives to maximize the probability of key recovery, and a defender who strives to reduce the cost while maintaining a certain degree of security. We obtain the optimal protection as an equilibrium in a game between the defender and the adversary. At the heart of the equilibrium computation are novel bounds for the probability of key recovery, which are expressed as a function of the applied protection and the attack strategy of a timing adversary. We put our techniques to work in a case study in which we identify optimal protections for libgcrypt's ElGamal implementation. We determine situations in which the optimal choice is to use a defensive, constant-time implementation and a small key, and situations in which the optimal choice is a more aggressively tuned (but leaky) implementation with a longer key.","PeriodicalId":210917,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 28th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","volume":"141 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rational Protection against Timing Attacks\",\"authors\":\"Goran Doychev, Boris Köpf\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSF.2015.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Timing attacks can effectively recover keys from cryptosystems. While they can be defeated using constant-time implementations, this defensive approach comes at the price of a performance penalty. One is hence faced with the problem of striking a balance between performance and security against timing attacks. In this paper, we propose a systematic approach for determining the optimal protection against timing attacks, on the example of cryptosystems based on discrete logarithms. Our model includes a resource-bounded timing adversary who strives to maximize the probability of key recovery, and a defender who strives to reduce the cost while maintaining a certain degree of security. We obtain the optimal protection as an equilibrium in a game between the defender and the adversary. At the heart of the equilibrium computation are novel bounds for the probability of key recovery, which are expressed as a function of the applied protection and the attack strategy of a timing adversary. We put our techniques to work in a case study in which we identify optimal protections for libgcrypt's ElGamal implementation. We determine situations in which the optimal choice is to use a defensive, constant-time implementation and a small key, and situations in which the optimal choice is a more aggressively tuned (but leaky) implementation with a longer key.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 28th Computer Security Foundations Symposium\",\"volume\":\"141 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 28th Computer Security Foundations Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2015.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 28th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2015.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

定时攻击可以有效地从密码系统中恢复密钥。虽然可以使用恒定时间实现来击败它们,但这种防御方法是以性能损失为代价的。因此,人们面临着如何在性能和安全之间取得平衡以应对定时攻击的问题。在本文中,我们提出了一种系统的方法来确定针对定时攻击的最佳保护,以基于离散对数的密码系统为例。我们的模型包括一个资源有限的时间对手,他努力最大化密钥恢复的概率,以及一个防御者,他努力在保持一定程度的安全性的同时降低成本。在防御者和对手的博弈中,我们得到了最优的保护。平衡计算的核心是密钥恢复概率的新界限,它被表示为应用保护和定时对手攻击策略的函数。我们将我们的技术应用于一个案例研究,在这个案例研究中,我们确定了libcrypt的ElGamal实现的最佳保护措施。我们确定在哪种情况下,最优选择是使用防御性的、恒定时间的实现和一个小键,以及在哪种情况下,最优选择是使用一个更长的键进行更积极的调整(但有漏洞)实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rational Protection against Timing Attacks
Timing attacks can effectively recover keys from cryptosystems. While they can be defeated using constant-time implementations, this defensive approach comes at the price of a performance penalty. One is hence faced with the problem of striking a balance between performance and security against timing attacks. In this paper, we propose a systematic approach for determining the optimal protection against timing attacks, on the example of cryptosystems based on discrete logarithms. Our model includes a resource-bounded timing adversary who strives to maximize the probability of key recovery, and a defender who strives to reduce the cost while maintaining a certain degree of security. We obtain the optimal protection as an equilibrium in a game between the defender and the adversary. At the heart of the equilibrium computation are novel bounds for the probability of key recovery, which are expressed as a function of the applied protection and the attack strategy of a timing adversary. We put our techniques to work in a case study in which we identify optimal protections for libgcrypt's ElGamal implementation. We determine situations in which the optimal choice is to use a defensive, constant-time implementation and a small key, and situations in which the optimal choice is a more aggressively tuned (but leaky) implementation with a longer key.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信