虚拟实验室学习与兴趣对学生理解机械波材料物理概念的影响

Nursafa Labinta, M. Pasaribu, U. Wahyono
{"title":"虚拟实验室学习与兴趣对学生理解机械波材料物理概念的影响","authors":"Nursafa Labinta, M. Pasaribu, U. Wahyono","doi":"10.22487/j25490192.2021.v5.i2.pp65-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine differences in conceptual understanding between students who take part in virtual laboratory learning. Based on the results of the calculation of the N-gain score test, the average N-gain score for the experimental class using a virtual laboratory was 44.85%, which was in the less effective category. With a minimum N-gain score of 0% and 90%. Meanwhile, the average N-gain score in the control class using a real laboratory was 19.45%, which was included in the ineffective category. With a minimum N-gain score of -90% and a maximum of 90%. Data were analyzed using a two-way ANAVA technique. The results showed that: (1) there were differences in conceptual understanding between students who were taught using a virtual laboratory and students who were taught through a real laboratory as indicated by the p-value (0.000) < a (0.05); (2) there are differences in conceptual understanding between students who have high learning interest and students who have low learning interest as indicated by the p-value (0.000) < a (0.05) and (3) there is no interaction between virtual laboratory learning.","PeriodicalId":373677,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Riset Pendidikan MIPA","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Virtual Laboratory Learning and Interest in Understanding Student's Physical Concepts of Mechanical Wave Materials\",\"authors\":\"Nursafa Labinta, M. Pasaribu, U. Wahyono\",\"doi\":\"10.22487/j25490192.2021.v5.i2.pp65-74\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to examine differences in conceptual understanding between students who take part in virtual laboratory learning. Based on the results of the calculation of the N-gain score test, the average N-gain score for the experimental class using a virtual laboratory was 44.85%, which was in the less effective category. With a minimum N-gain score of 0% and 90%. Meanwhile, the average N-gain score in the control class using a real laboratory was 19.45%, which was included in the ineffective category. With a minimum N-gain score of -90% and a maximum of 90%. Data were analyzed using a two-way ANAVA technique. The results showed that: (1) there were differences in conceptual understanding between students who were taught using a virtual laboratory and students who were taught through a real laboratory as indicated by the p-value (0.000) < a (0.05); (2) there are differences in conceptual understanding between students who have high learning interest and students who have low learning interest as indicated by the p-value (0.000) < a (0.05) and (3) there is no interaction between virtual laboratory learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Riset Pendidikan MIPA\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Riset Pendidikan MIPA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22487/j25490192.2021.v5.i2.pp65-74\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Riset Pendidikan MIPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22487/j25490192.2021.v5.i2.pp65-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨参与虚拟实验室学习的学生在概念理解上的差异。根据n增益测试的计算结果,使用虚拟实验室的实验班的平均n增益分数为44.85%,属于效果较差的类别。最小n增益分数分别为0%和90%。同时,使用真实实验室的对照班的平均n增益分数为19.45%,属于无效类别。最小n增益分数为-90%,最大值为90%。数据分析采用双向ANAVA技术。结果表明:(1)虚拟实验室教学的学生与真实实验室教学的学生在概念理解上存在差异,p值(0.000)< a (0.05);(2)高学习兴趣学生与低学习兴趣学生在概念理解上存在差异,p值(0.000)< a(0.05);(3)虚拟实验室学习与高学习兴趣学生之间不存在交互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Virtual Laboratory Learning and Interest in Understanding Student's Physical Concepts of Mechanical Wave Materials
This study aims to examine differences in conceptual understanding between students who take part in virtual laboratory learning. Based on the results of the calculation of the N-gain score test, the average N-gain score for the experimental class using a virtual laboratory was 44.85%, which was in the less effective category. With a minimum N-gain score of 0% and 90%. Meanwhile, the average N-gain score in the control class using a real laboratory was 19.45%, which was included in the ineffective category. With a minimum N-gain score of -90% and a maximum of 90%. Data were analyzed using a two-way ANAVA technique. The results showed that: (1) there were differences in conceptual understanding between students who were taught using a virtual laboratory and students who were taught through a real laboratory as indicated by the p-value (0.000) < a (0.05); (2) there are differences in conceptual understanding between students who have high learning interest and students who have low learning interest as indicated by the p-value (0.000) < a (0.05) and (3) there is no interaction between virtual laboratory learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信