护士权威在侵入性护理在私人护理诊所,雅加达

Aris Prio Agus Santoso, M. Musta’in, Endrat Kartiko Utomo, Aknes Galih Sumirat
{"title":"护士权威在侵入性护理在私人护理诊所,雅加达","authors":"Aris Prio Agus Santoso, M. Musta’in, Endrat Kartiko Utomo, Aknes Galih Sumirat","doi":"10.26911/ICPHmanagement.FP.08.2021.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Professional authority encompasses the power, relative autonomy, intellectual and political influence and respect that we as professional nurses are accorded within health care systems and society at-large because we provide our distinctive service very well. Nurses' accountability - our being answerable - to individuals, families and communities in relation to the profession's social mandate by which we are obligated to provide a particular public service. This study aimed to investigate nurse authority in invasive care at the private nursing clinic, Surakarta. Subjects and Method: This was a normative-sociological juridical qualitative study with a descriptive design. The study was conducted in Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia from July to September 2021. The number of samples in this study was seven respondents throughout Surakarta City. The key informants were 7 nurses. They were selected by purposive sampling. The data were collected by in-depth interview, document review, and observation. The data were analyzed by triangulation. Results: There is the principle of lex superior derogate legi inferior in nursing law. The law no. 36/2009 should take precedence over the Minister of Health Regulation No. 26/2009. There is no regulation regarding the prohibition of nurses from performing invasive actions, thus giving rise to the growth of the principle of legality (nullum delictum nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali) in nursing services. Conclusion: There is a low nurse's authority in carrying out invasive procedures.","PeriodicalId":399689,"journal":{"name":"Developing a Global Pandemic Exit Strategy and Framework for Global Health Security","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurse Authority in Invasive Care at the Private Nursing Clinic, Surakarta\",\"authors\":\"Aris Prio Agus Santoso, M. Musta’in, Endrat Kartiko Utomo, Aknes Galih Sumirat\",\"doi\":\"10.26911/ICPHmanagement.FP.08.2021.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Professional authority encompasses the power, relative autonomy, intellectual and political influence and respect that we as professional nurses are accorded within health care systems and society at-large because we provide our distinctive service very well. Nurses' accountability - our being answerable - to individuals, families and communities in relation to the profession's social mandate by which we are obligated to provide a particular public service. This study aimed to investigate nurse authority in invasive care at the private nursing clinic, Surakarta. Subjects and Method: This was a normative-sociological juridical qualitative study with a descriptive design. The study was conducted in Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia from July to September 2021. The number of samples in this study was seven respondents throughout Surakarta City. The key informants were 7 nurses. They were selected by purposive sampling. The data were collected by in-depth interview, document review, and observation. The data were analyzed by triangulation. Results: There is the principle of lex superior derogate legi inferior in nursing law. The law no. 36/2009 should take precedence over the Minister of Health Regulation No. 26/2009. There is no regulation regarding the prohibition of nurses from performing invasive actions, thus giving rise to the growth of the principle of legality (nullum delictum nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali) in nursing services. Conclusion: There is a low nurse's authority in carrying out invasive procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developing a Global Pandemic Exit Strategy and Framework for Global Health Security\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developing a Global Pandemic Exit Strategy and Framework for Global Health Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26911/ICPHmanagement.FP.08.2021.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developing a Global Pandemic Exit Strategy and Framework for Global Health Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26911/ICPHmanagement.FP.08.2021.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:专业权威包括权力、相对自主权、知识和政治影响以及我们作为专业护士在医疗保健系统和整个社会中被赋予的尊重,因为我们提供了非常出色的独特服务。护士的责任-我们对个人,家庭和社区负责-与职业的社会授权有关,我们有义务提供特定的公共服务。本研究目的在调查泗水市私人护理诊所护士在有创护理中的权威。研究对象和方法:这是一项具有描述性设计的规范社会学法学定性研究。该研究于2021年7月至9月在印度尼西亚中爪哇省苏拉卡塔进行。本研究的样本数量为整个泗水市的7个受访者。主要举报人为7名护士。他们是通过有目的的抽样选择的。采用深度访谈、文献查阅、观察等方法收集资料。数据用三角测量法进行分析。结果:护理法中存在优胜劣汰的原则。法律没有。第36/2009号条例应优先于第26/2009号卫生部长条例。没有关于禁止护士进行侵入性行为的规定,因此,在护理服务中,法律原则(无明文不为罪,无明文不为罪)得到了发展。结论:护士在实施有创手术时权威性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurse Authority in Invasive Care at the Private Nursing Clinic, Surakarta
Background: Professional authority encompasses the power, relative autonomy, intellectual and political influence and respect that we as professional nurses are accorded within health care systems and society at-large because we provide our distinctive service very well. Nurses' accountability - our being answerable - to individuals, families and communities in relation to the profession's social mandate by which we are obligated to provide a particular public service. This study aimed to investigate nurse authority in invasive care at the private nursing clinic, Surakarta. Subjects and Method: This was a normative-sociological juridical qualitative study with a descriptive design. The study was conducted in Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia from July to September 2021. The number of samples in this study was seven respondents throughout Surakarta City. The key informants were 7 nurses. They were selected by purposive sampling. The data were collected by in-depth interview, document review, and observation. The data were analyzed by triangulation. Results: There is the principle of lex superior derogate legi inferior in nursing law. The law no. 36/2009 should take precedence over the Minister of Health Regulation No. 26/2009. There is no regulation regarding the prohibition of nurses from performing invasive actions, thus giving rise to the growth of the principle of legality (nullum delictum nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali) in nursing services. Conclusion: There is a low nurse's authority in carrying out invasive procedures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信