通过提高程序知识和程序理解,消除学习者在编程问题解决中的困惑

Shuyao Ma, Zehui Zhan, Xuanyan Zhong
{"title":"通过提高程序知识和程序理解,消除学习者在编程问题解决中的困惑","authors":"Shuyao Ma, Zehui Zhan, Xuanyan Zhong","doi":"10.1145/3578837.3578868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learners would fall into confusion when confronted with an impasse. Although moderate confusion is proved to be effective for learning, being continuously confused without assistance would lead learners to harmful frustration. To make good use of confusion and avoid learners from falling into pessimistic academic emotions in persistent confusion, a teaching intervention model adopted in overcoming the difficulties is designed. The model includes 3 kinds of hints in promoting procedural knowledge and reflective discussion of 3 perspectives for deepening procedural understanding. To examine the designed intervention model, an experiment was conducted among undergraduates without previous knowledge. Learners were required to report their affective states and participate in a semi-structured interview. Results demonstrated that providing such step-by-step hints are necessary for dispelling confusion rather than presenting standardized answer directly. Besides, reflective discussion is effective for knowledge mastery and improvement. The model could be improved by providing reflective feedback and learning supports during the process.","PeriodicalId":150970,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Education and E-Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eliminating Learners' Confusion during Programming Problem Solving by Enhancing Procedural Knowledge and Procedural Understanding\",\"authors\":\"Shuyao Ma, Zehui Zhan, Xuanyan Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3578837.3578868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learners would fall into confusion when confronted with an impasse. Although moderate confusion is proved to be effective for learning, being continuously confused without assistance would lead learners to harmful frustration. To make good use of confusion and avoid learners from falling into pessimistic academic emotions in persistent confusion, a teaching intervention model adopted in overcoming the difficulties is designed. The model includes 3 kinds of hints in promoting procedural knowledge and reflective discussion of 3 perspectives for deepening procedural understanding. To examine the designed intervention model, an experiment was conducted among undergraduates without previous knowledge. Learners were required to report their affective states and participate in a semi-structured interview. Results demonstrated that providing such step-by-step hints are necessary for dispelling confusion rather than presenting standardized answer directly. Besides, reflective discussion is effective for knowledge mastery and improvement. The model could be improved by providing reflective feedback and learning supports during the process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Education and E-Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Education and E-Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3578837.3578868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Education and E-Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3578837.3578868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学习者在遇到僵局时会陷入困惑。虽然适度的困惑被证明对学习是有效的,但在没有帮助的情况下持续的困惑会导致学习者产生有害的挫折。为了充分利用困惑,避免学习者在持续的困惑中陷入悲观的学术情绪,设计了克服困难的教学干预模式。该模型包括促进程序性知识的三种提示和深化程序性理解的三种视角的反思性讨论。为了检验所设计的干预模型,在没有先前知识的本科生中进行了实验。学习者被要求报告他们的情感状态,并参加一个半结构化的访谈。结果表明,提供这种循序渐进的提示对于消除困惑是必要的,而不是直接给出标准化的答案。反思性讨论对知识的掌握和提高是有效的。该模型可以通过在过程中提供反思性反馈和学习支持来改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eliminating Learners' Confusion during Programming Problem Solving by Enhancing Procedural Knowledge and Procedural Understanding
Learners would fall into confusion when confronted with an impasse. Although moderate confusion is proved to be effective for learning, being continuously confused without assistance would lead learners to harmful frustration. To make good use of confusion and avoid learners from falling into pessimistic academic emotions in persistent confusion, a teaching intervention model adopted in overcoming the difficulties is designed. The model includes 3 kinds of hints in promoting procedural knowledge and reflective discussion of 3 perspectives for deepening procedural understanding. To examine the designed intervention model, an experiment was conducted among undergraduates without previous knowledge. Learners were required to report their affective states and participate in a semi-structured interview. Results demonstrated that providing such step-by-step hints are necessary for dispelling confusion rather than presenting standardized answer directly. Besides, reflective discussion is effective for knowledge mastery and improvement. The model could be improved by providing reflective feedback and learning supports during the process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信