联合抗逆转录病毒治疗前HIV疾病的快速进展是否会阻碍HIV-1抑制后CD4+ t细胞的最佳恢复?

I. Jarrín, N. Pantazis, J. Dalmau, A. Phillips, A. Olson, C. Mussini, F. Boufassa, D. Costagliola, K. Porter, J. Blanco, J. Del Amo, J. Martinez-Picado
{"title":"联合抗逆转录病毒治疗前HIV疾病的快速进展是否会阻碍HIV-1抑制后CD4+ t细胞的最佳恢复?","authors":"I. Jarrín, N. Pantazis, J. Dalmau, A. Phillips, A. Olson, C. Mussini, F. Boufassa, D. Costagliola, K. Porter, J. Blanco, J. Del Amo, J. Martinez-Picado","doi":"10.1097/QAD.0000000000000805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:This article compares trends in CD4+ T-cell recovery and proportions achieving optimal restoration (≥500 cells/&mgr;l) after viral suppression following combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) initiation between rapid and nonrapid progressors. Methods:We included HIV-1 seroconverters achieving viral suppression within 6 months of cART. Rapid progressors were individuals experiencing at least one CD4+ less than 200 cells/&mgr;l within 12 months of seroconverters before cART. We used piecewise linear mixed models and logistic regression for optimal restoration. Results:Of 4024 individuals, 294 (7.3%) were classified as rapid progressors. At the same CD4+ T-cell count at cART start (baseline), rapid progressors experienced faster CD4+ T-cell increases than nonrapid progressors in first month [difference (95% confidence interval) in mean increase/month (square root scale): 1.82 (1.61; 2.04)], which reversed to slightly slower increases in months 1–18 [−0.05 (−0.06; −0.03)] and no significant differences in 18–60 months [−0.003 (−0.01; 0.01)]. Percentage achieving optimal restoration was significantly lower for rapid progressors than nonrapid progressors at months 12 (29.2 vs. 62.5%) and 36 (47.1 vs. 72.4%) but not at month 60 (70.4 vs. 71.8%). These differences disappeared after adjusting for baseline CD4+ T-cell count: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.86 (0.61; 1.20), 0.90 (0.38; 2.17) and 1.56 (0.55; 4.46) at months 12, 36 and 60, respectively. Conclusion:Among people on suppressive antiretroviral therapy, rapid progressors experience faster initial increases of CD4+ T-cell counts than nonrapid progressors, but are less likely to achieve optimal restoration during the first 36 months after cART, mainly because of lower CD4+ T-cell counts at cART initiation.","PeriodicalId":355297,"journal":{"name":"AIDS (London, England)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does rapid HIV disease progression prior to combination antiretroviral therapy hinder optimal CD4+ T-cell recovery once HIV-1 suppression is achieved?\",\"authors\":\"I. Jarrín, N. Pantazis, J. Dalmau, A. Phillips, A. Olson, C. Mussini, F. Boufassa, D. Costagliola, K. Porter, J. Blanco, J. Del Amo, J. Martinez-Picado\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/QAD.0000000000000805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective:This article compares trends in CD4+ T-cell recovery and proportions achieving optimal restoration (≥500 cells/&mgr;l) after viral suppression following combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) initiation between rapid and nonrapid progressors. Methods:We included HIV-1 seroconverters achieving viral suppression within 6 months of cART. Rapid progressors were individuals experiencing at least one CD4+ less than 200 cells/&mgr;l within 12 months of seroconverters before cART. We used piecewise linear mixed models and logistic regression for optimal restoration. Results:Of 4024 individuals, 294 (7.3%) were classified as rapid progressors. At the same CD4+ T-cell count at cART start (baseline), rapid progressors experienced faster CD4+ T-cell increases than nonrapid progressors in first month [difference (95% confidence interval) in mean increase/month (square root scale): 1.82 (1.61; 2.04)], which reversed to slightly slower increases in months 1–18 [−0.05 (−0.06; −0.03)] and no significant differences in 18–60 months [−0.003 (−0.01; 0.01)]. Percentage achieving optimal restoration was significantly lower for rapid progressors than nonrapid progressors at months 12 (29.2 vs. 62.5%) and 36 (47.1 vs. 72.4%) but not at month 60 (70.4 vs. 71.8%). These differences disappeared after adjusting for baseline CD4+ T-cell count: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.86 (0.61; 1.20), 0.90 (0.38; 2.17) and 1.56 (0.55; 4.46) at months 12, 36 and 60, respectively. Conclusion:Among people on suppressive antiretroviral therapy, rapid progressors experience faster initial increases of CD4+ T-cell counts than nonrapid progressors, but are less likely to achieve optimal restoration during the first 36 months after cART, mainly because of lower CD4+ T-cell counts at cART initiation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

目的:本文比较快速和非快速进展患者在联合抗逆转录病毒治疗(cART)开始后病毒抑制后CD4+ t细胞恢复的趋势和达到最佳恢复的比例(≥500个细胞/&mgr; 1)。方法:我们纳入了在cART治疗6个月内实现病毒抑制的HIV-1血清转化者。快速进展者是指在cART前的12个月内至少有一个CD4+低于200个/ /的个体。我们使用分段线性混合模型和逻辑回归进行最优恢复。结果:4024例患者中,294例(7.3%)为快速进展者。在cART开始时(基线)CD4+ t细胞计数相同的情况下,快速进展者在第一个月的CD4+ t细胞增加速度快于非快速进展者[平均增加/月(平方根量表)差异(95%置信区间):1.82 (1.61;[- 0.05 (- 0.06;−0.03)],18-60个月无显著差异[−0.003(−0.01;0.01)]。在第12个月(29.2 vs. 62.5%)和第36个月(47.1 vs. 72.4%),快速进展组获得最佳恢复的百分比明显低于非快速进展组,但在第60个月(70.4 vs. 71.8%)没有明显差异。调整基线CD4+ t细胞计数后,这些差异消失:优势比(95%置信区间)0.86 (0.61;1.20), 0.90 (0.38;2.17)和1.56 (0.55;4.46),分别在第12个月、第36个月和第60个月。结论:在接受抑开性抗逆转录病毒治疗的患者中,快速进展者CD4+ t细胞计数的初始增加速度比非快速进展者更快,但在cART后的前36个月内实现最佳恢复的可能性较小,主要是因为cART开始时CD4+ t细胞计数较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does rapid HIV disease progression prior to combination antiretroviral therapy hinder optimal CD4+ T-cell recovery once HIV-1 suppression is achieved?
Objective:This article compares trends in CD4+ T-cell recovery and proportions achieving optimal restoration (≥500 cells/&mgr;l) after viral suppression following combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) initiation between rapid and nonrapid progressors. Methods:We included HIV-1 seroconverters achieving viral suppression within 6 months of cART. Rapid progressors were individuals experiencing at least one CD4+ less than 200 cells/&mgr;l within 12 months of seroconverters before cART. We used piecewise linear mixed models and logistic regression for optimal restoration. Results:Of 4024 individuals, 294 (7.3%) were classified as rapid progressors. At the same CD4+ T-cell count at cART start (baseline), rapid progressors experienced faster CD4+ T-cell increases than nonrapid progressors in first month [difference (95% confidence interval) in mean increase/month (square root scale): 1.82 (1.61; 2.04)], which reversed to slightly slower increases in months 1–18 [−0.05 (−0.06; −0.03)] and no significant differences in 18–60 months [−0.003 (−0.01; 0.01)]. Percentage achieving optimal restoration was significantly lower for rapid progressors than nonrapid progressors at months 12 (29.2 vs. 62.5%) and 36 (47.1 vs. 72.4%) but not at month 60 (70.4 vs. 71.8%). These differences disappeared after adjusting for baseline CD4+ T-cell count: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.86 (0.61; 1.20), 0.90 (0.38; 2.17) and 1.56 (0.55; 4.46) at months 12, 36 and 60, respectively. Conclusion:Among people on suppressive antiretroviral therapy, rapid progressors experience faster initial increases of CD4+ T-cell counts than nonrapid progressors, but are less likely to achieve optimal restoration during the first 36 months after cART, mainly because of lower CD4+ T-cell counts at cART initiation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信