少杀慎杀?中国死刑改革述评

Jiang Su
{"title":"少杀慎杀?中国死刑改革述评","authors":"Jiang Su","doi":"10.5235/205174814814222540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China's death penalty scenario is exceptional not only in terms of the global trend but in terms of its sheer number of executions. Since the mid-2000s, death penalty has gained momentum in China under domestic and international pressure. A series of procedural and substantive reforms have been implemented, which changed the whole picture of the death penalty regime in China. On the whole, it can be concluded that China is moving from “kill many” to “kill fewer and kill cautiously”. However, the abolition of death penalty in China is unlikely to occur in the near future since the regime is highly restricted by political structure, the lack of human rights discourse and public opinion.","PeriodicalId":108655,"journal":{"name":"Peking University Law Journal","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kill Fewer and Kill Cautiously? A Critical Review of Death Penalty Reforms in China\",\"authors\":\"Jiang Su\",\"doi\":\"10.5235/205174814814222540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"China's death penalty scenario is exceptional not only in terms of the global trend but in terms of its sheer number of executions. Since the mid-2000s, death penalty has gained momentum in China under domestic and international pressure. A series of procedural and substantive reforms have been implemented, which changed the whole picture of the death penalty regime in China. On the whole, it can be concluded that China is moving from “kill many” to “kill fewer and kill cautiously”. However, the abolition of death penalty in China is unlikely to occur in the near future since the regime is highly restricted by political structure, the lack of human rights discourse and public opinion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peking University Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peking University Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5235/205174814814222540\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peking University Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5235/205174814814222540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无论是就全球趋势而言,还是就其执行死刑的数量而言,中国的死刑情况都是例外。自2000年代中期以来,在国内和国际压力下,死刑在中国得到了加强。实施了一系列程序性和实质性改革,改变了中国死刑制度的整体面貌。总的来说,可以得出结论,中国正在从“多杀”转向“少杀慎杀”。然而,在中国废除死刑不太可能在不久的将来发生,因为该政权受到政治结构、缺乏人权话语和公众舆论的高度限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kill Fewer and Kill Cautiously? A Critical Review of Death Penalty Reforms in China
China's death penalty scenario is exceptional not only in terms of the global trend but in terms of its sheer number of executions. Since the mid-2000s, death penalty has gained momentum in China under domestic and international pressure. A series of procedural and substantive reforms have been implemented, which changed the whole picture of the death penalty regime in China. On the whole, it can be concluded that China is moving from “kill many” to “kill fewer and kill cautiously”. However, the abolition of death penalty in China is unlikely to occur in the near future since the regime is highly restricted by political structure, the lack of human rights discourse and public opinion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信