环境辅助生活中人工神经网络与脉冲神经网络的比较

Sven Nitzsche, Brian Pachideh, Moritz Neher, Marius Kreutzer, Norbert Link, Lukas Theurer, J. Becker
{"title":"环境辅助生活中人工神经网络与脉冲神经网络的比较","authors":"Sven Nitzsche, Brian Pachideh, Moritz Neher, Marius Kreutzer, Norbert Link, Lukas Theurer, J. Becker","doi":"10.1109/ssi56489.2022.9901412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In assisted living environments, various situations may arise where a person falls or is otherwise injured and is unable to call for help on their own. In such situations, it is necessary to quickly identify the problem and take appropriate action, such as calling for help. This can be supported or even automated by using vision-based AI systems. In this context, we investigated and evaluated different AI solutions for rapid human action recognition. More specifically, we trained and compared artificial neural networks (ANN) in combination with frame-based cameras to a processing pipeline using spiking neural networks (SNN) and event-based cameras. For the SNNs, we further distinguished and compared two models, which we simulated in software and implemented on event-based hardware. The SNNs feature various layer types, e.g. fully-connected, spiking convolutions and recurrent. The implementation on event-based hardware was compared to GPU-based embedded hardware for artificial neural networks. The comparison was made primarily with regard to the highest possible energy efficiency in order to enable battery-powered vision systems in the future that can be used flexibly not only in assisted living, but also in industrial and smart city applications. The networks were constructed in such a way that they achieve a similar classification accuracy, which was measured on our own dataset specifically recorded for the project.","PeriodicalId":339250,"journal":{"name":"2022 Smart Systems Integration (SSI)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Artificial and Spiking Neural Networks for Ambient-Assisted Living\",\"authors\":\"Sven Nitzsche, Brian Pachideh, Moritz Neher, Marius Kreutzer, Norbert Link, Lukas Theurer, J. Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ssi56489.2022.9901412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In assisted living environments, various situations may arise where a person falls or is otherwise injured and is unable to call for help on their own. In such situations, it is necessary to quickly identify the problem and take appropriate action, such as calling for help. This can be supported or even automated by using vision-based AI systems. In this context, we investigated and evaluated different AI solutions for rapid human action recognition. More specifically, we trained and compared artificial neural networks (ANN) in combination with frame-based cameras to a processing pipeline using spiking neural networks (SNN) and event-based cameras. For the SNNs, we further distinguished and compared two models, which we simulated in software and implemented on event-based hardware. The SNNs feature various layer types, e.g. fully-connected, spiking convolutions and recurrent. The implementation on event-based hardware was compared to GPU-based embedded hardware for artificial neural networks. The comparison was made primarily with regard to the highest possible energy efficiency in order to enable battery-powered vision systems in the future that can be used flexibly not only in assisted living, but also in industrial and smart city applications. The networks were constructed in such a way that they achieve a similar classification accuracy, which was measured on our own dataset specifically recorded for the project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 Smart Systems Integration (SSI)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 Smart Systems Integration (SSI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ssi56489.2022.9901412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Smart Systems Integration (SSI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ssi56489.2022.9901412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在辅助生活环境中,可能会出现各种情况,如一个人跌倒或因其他原因受伤而无法自己求助。在这种情况下,有必要快速识别问题并采取适当的行动,例如寻求帮助。这可以通过使用基于视觉的人工智能系统来支持甚至自动化。在此背景下,我们研究并评估了用于快速识别人类行为的不同人工智能解决方案。更具体地说,我们训练并比较了人工神经网络(ANN)与基于帧的相机的结合,以及使用峰值神经网络(SNN)和基于事件的相机的处理管道。对于snn,我们进一步区分和比较了两种模型,我们在软件中进行了模拟,并在基于事件的硬件上实现了这两种模型。snn具有各种层类型,例如,全连接,尖峰卷积和循环。比较了基于事件的硬件和基于gpu的嵌入式硬件对人工神经网络的实现。为了使未来的电池供电视觉系统不仅可以灵活地用于辅助生活,还可以用于工业和智慧城市应用,主要是在尽可能高的能源效率方面进行了比较。网络的构建方式使它们达到了类似的分类精度,这是在我们自己专门为该项目记录的数据集上测量的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Artificial and Spiking Neural Networks for Ambient-Assisted Living
In assisted living environments, various situations may arise where a person falls or is otherwise injured and is unable to call for help on their own. In such situations, it is necessary to quickly identify the problem and take appropriate action, such as calling for help. This can be supported or even automated by using vision-based AI systems. In this context, we investigated and evaluated different AI solutions for rapid human action recognition. More specifically, we trained and compared artificial neural networks (ANN) in combination with frame-based cameras to a processing pipeline using spiking neural networks (SNN) and event-based cameras. For the SNNs, we further distinguished and compared two models, which we simulated in software and implemented on event-based hardware. The SNNs feature various layer types, e.g. fully-connected, spiking convolutions and recurrent. The implementation on event-based hardware was compared to GPU-based embedded hardware for artificial neural networks. The comparison was made primarily with regard to the highest possible energy efficiency in order to enable battery-powered vision systems in the future that can be used flexibly not only in assisted living, but also in industrial and smart city applications. The networks were constructed in such a way that they achieve a similar classification accuracy, which was measured on our own dataset specifically recorded for the project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信