自我的项链观

Stance: an international undergraduate philosophy journal Pub Date : 2019-09-25 DOI:10.33043/s.12.1.96-105

Yifeng Xu

{"title":"自我的项链观","authors":"Yifeng Xu","doi":"10.33043/s.12.1.96-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I provide a framework for accounting for the self, based on a reconstruction of Galen Strawson’s “theory of SESMETs,” or the Pearl view, with Barry Dainton’s continuous consciousness thesis. I argue that the framework I provide adequately accounts for the self and is preferable to solely adopting either Strawson’s or Dainton’s theory. I call my reconstruction the “Necklace” view of the self.","PeriodicalId":375047,"journal":{"name":"Stance: an international undergraduate philosophy journal","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Necklace View of the Self\",\"authors\":\"Yifeng Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.33043/s.12.1.96-105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I provide a framework for accounting for the self, based on a reconstruction of Galen Strawson’s “theory of SESMETs,” or the Pearl view, with Barry Dainton’s continuous consciousness thesis. I argue that the framework I provide adequately accounts for the self and is preferable to solely adopting either Strawson’s or Dainton’s theory. I call my reconstruction the “Necklace” view of the self.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stance: an international undergraduate philosophy journal\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stance: an international undergraduate philosophy journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33043/s.12.1.96-105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stance: an international undergraduate philosophy journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33043/s.12.1.96-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中，我提供了一个解释自我的框架，基于盖伦·斯特劳森(Galen Strawson)的“SESMETs理论”或珍珠观点的重建，以及巴里·丹顿(Barry Dainton)的连续意识理论。我认为，我提供的框架充分解释了自我，比单独采用斯特劳森或丹顿的理论更可取。我把我的重构称为自我的“项链”观。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Necklace View of the Self

In this paper, I provide a framework for accounting for the self, based on a reconstruction of Galen Strawson’s “theory of SESMETs,” or the Pearl view, with Barry Dainton’s continuous consciousness thesis. I argue that the framework I provide adequately accounts for the self and is preferable to solely adopting either Strawson’s or Dainton’s theory. I call my reconstruction the “Necklace” view of the self.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Stance: an international undergraduate philosophy journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量