意向性、信息和经验

Johannes L. Brandl
{"title":"意向性、信息和经验","authors":"Johannes L. Brandl","doi":"10.1515/9783110328851.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fact that we have thoughts about things is a salient feature of our mental life. In phenomenology this feature goes by the name intentionality, while cognitive psychologists prefer to speak of the representational power of the mind. Where does this power come from? It is generally agreed today that one attempt at answering this question has thoroughly failed. The power of mental representation (i.e. intentionality) cannot be explained as a feature of language. Many philosophers have therefore turned to a more promising project, namely to explain intentionality in information-theoretic terms. This project, too, has come under attack however. Such reductive explanations fail, it is argued, because they leave out the constitutive relation between intentionality and experience. If intentionality can be explained at all, it must be grounded in a primitive non-relational feature of our experience. In this paper I will take up this adverbialist challenge to an information-theoretic explanation of intentionality and show how it can be met.","PeriodicalId":317292,"journal":{"name":"From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series","volume":"580 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intentionality, Information, and Experience\",\"authors\":\"Johannes L. Brandl\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110328851.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The fact that we have thoughts about things is a salient feature of our mental life. In phenomenology this feature goes by the name intentionality, while cognitive psychologists prefer to speak of the representational power of the mind. Where does this power come from? It is generally agreed today that one attempt at answering this question has thoroughly failed. The power of mental representation (i.e. intentionality) cannot be explained as a feature of language. Many philosophers have therefore turned to a more promising project, namely to explain intentionality in information-theoretic terms. This project, too, has come under attack however. Such reductive explanations fail, it is argued, because they leave out the constitutive relation between intentionality and experience. If intentionality can be explained at all, it must be grounded in a primitive non-relational feature of our experience. In this paper I will take up this adverbialist challenge to an information-theoretic explanation of intentionality and show how it can be met.\",\"PeriodicalId\":317292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series\",\"volume\":\"580 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110328851.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110328851.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对事物有想法这一事实是我们精神生活的一个显著特征。在现象学中,这一特征被称为意向性,而认知心理学家更喜欢称之为思维的表征能力。这种力量从何而来?今天,人们普遍认为,回答这个问题的一次尝试彻底失败了。心理表征的力量(即意向性)不能被解释为语言的特征。因此,许多哲学家转向了一个更有希望的项目,即用信息理论的术语来解释意向性。然而,这个项目也受到了攻击。有人认为,这种简化解释之所以失败,是因为它们忽略了意向性和经验之间的本构关系。如果意向性可以被解释,它必须建立在我们经验的原始非关系特征的基础上。在本文中,我将对意向性的信息理论解释提出状语式的挑战,并展示如何满足它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intentionality, Information, and Experience
The fact that we have thoughts about things is a salient feature of our mental life. In phenomenology this feature goes by the name intentionality, while cognitive psychologists prefer to speak of the representational power of the mind. Where does this power come from? It is generally agreed today that one attempt at answering this question has thoroughly failed. The power of mental representation (i.e. intentionality) cannot be explained as a feature of language. Many philosophers have therefore turned to a more promising project, namely to explain intentionality in information-theoretic terms. This project, too, has come under attack however. Such reductive explanations fail, it is argued, because they leave out the constitutive relation between intentionality and experience. If intentionality can be explained at all, it must be grounded in a primitive non-relational feature of our experience. In this paper I will take up this adverbialist challenge to an information-theoretic explanation of intentionality and show how it can be met.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信