{"title":"晚清民初“梦窗热”溯源:从周济与吴中词人的创作看梦窗词的崛起","authors":"瑋 徐","doi":"10.24112/sinohumanitas.352631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \n晚清民初詞壇向有“夢窗熱”一説,指當時詞人特重夢窗詞,學夢窗成風。吴文英在詞史上的升降浮沈落差甚大。自清代中後期,夢窗開始進入詞家的視野,並受到一定的推崇,而在晚清民初一躍成爲詞壇圭臬。箇中原因,耐人尋味,也可見夢窗詞獨特的魅力。道光詞壇的重要選本《宋四家詞選》和《宋七家詞選》等,以及一些相關的評論,都可視爲吴文英詞崛起的端倪。隨著論者對夢窗詞更深入的認知,他們在創作中對夢窗詞亦有一定程度的仿擬和化用。本文以這個時期爲日後“夢窗熱”之發端,並擬結合詞論,觀察周濟及吴中詞人在創作時對夢窗詞的摹習。 \nThe article aims to examine the reception of a controversial poet, Wu Wenying 吴文英 (ca. 1200-ca. 1260), who was not highly regarded until after the Daoguan reign-period of the Qing dynasty (1820-1850), but quickly became the most influential figure in both the fields of critiques and creative writing. Despite the criticism, Wu continued to influence on the ci-poets in the 20th century, This article explores the beginning of Wu’s rising popularity by investigating important critics and poets who were active during the Daoguan era, namely Zhou Ji (1781-1839), Ge Zai (1786-1856), and Zhu Shou (1789-1840). By analyzing the circumstances that gave rise to the popularity of Wu and the ci-poems written in an attempt to emulate Mengchuang’s style, the article aims to learn how tradition was drawn upon and transformed, producing new meanings among late Qing poets.","PeriodicalId":108589,"journal":{"name":"人文中國學報","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"晚清民初“夢窗熱”溯源:從周濟與吴中詞人的創作看夢窗詞的崛起\",\"authors\":\"瑋 徐\",\"doi\":\"10.24112/sinohumanitas.352631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \\n晚清民初詞壇向有“夢窗熱”一説,指當時詞人特重夢窗詞,學夢窗成風。吴文英在詞史上的升降浮沈落差甚大。自清代中後期,夢窗開始進入詞家的視野,並受到一定的推崇,而在晚清民初一躍成爲詞壇圭臬。箇中原因,耐人尋味,也可見夢窗詞獨特的魅力。道光詞壇的重要選本《宋四家詞選》和《宋七家詞選》等,以及一些相關的評論,都可視爲吴文英詞崛起的端倪。隨著論者對夢窗詞更深入的認知,他們在創作中對夢窗詞亦有一定程度的仿擬和化用。本文以這個時期爲日後“夢窗熱”之發端,並擬結合詞論,觀察周濟及吴中詞人在創作時對夢窗詞的摹習。 \\nThe article aims to examine the reception of a controversial poet, Wu Wenying 吴文英 (ca. 1200-ca. 1260), who was not highly regarded until after the Daoguan reign-period of the Qing dynasty (1820-1850), but quickly became the most influential figure in both the fields of critiques and creative writing. Despite the criticism, Wu continued to influence on the ci-poets in the 20th century, This article explores the beginning of Wu’s rising popularity by investigating important critics and poets who were active during the Daoguan era, namely Zhou Ji (1781-1839), Ge Zai (1786-1856), and Zhu Shou (1789-1840). By analyzing the circumstances that gave rise to the popularity of Wu and the ci-poems written in an attempt to emulate Mengchuang’s style, the article aims to learn how tradition was drawn upon and transformed, producing new meanings among late Qing poets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"人文中國學報\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"人文中國學報\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24112/sinohumanitas.352631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"人文中國學報","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24112/sinohumanitas.352631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 晚清民初词坛向有“梦窗热”一说,指当时词人特重梦窗词,学梦窗成风。吴文英在词史上的升降浮沈落差甚大。自清代中后期,梦窗开始进入词家的视野,并受到一定的推崇,而在晚清民初一跃成为词坛圭臬。个中原因,耐人寻味,也可见梦窗词独特的魅力。道光词坛的重要选本《宋四家词选》和《宋七家词选》等,以及一些相关的评论,都可视为吴文英词崛起的端倪。随著论者对梦窗词更深入的认知,他们在创作中对梦窗词亦有一定程度的仿拟和化用。本文以这个时期为日后“梦窗热”之发端,并拟结合词论,观察周济及吴中词人在创作时对梦窗词的摹习。 The article aims to examine the reception of a controversial poet, Wu Wenying 吴文英 (ca. 1200-ca. 1260), who was not highly regarded until after the Daoguan reign-period of the Qing dynasty (1820-1850), but quickly became the most influential figure in both the fields of critiques and creative writing. Despite the criticism, Wu continued to influence on the ci-poets in the 20th century, This article explores the beginning of Wu’s rising popularity by investigating important critics and poets who were active during the Daoguan era, namely Zhou Ji (1781-1839), Ge Zai (1786-1856), and Zhu Shou (1789-1840). By analyzing the circumstances that gave rise to the popularity of Wu and the ci-poems written in an attempt to emulate Mengchuang’s style, the article aims to learn how tradition was drawn upon and transformed, producing new meanings among late Qing poets.
LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English.
晚清民初詞壇向有“夢窗熱”一説,指當時詞人特重夢窗詞,學夢窗成風。吴文英在詞史上的升降浮沈落差甚大。自清代中後期,夢窗開始進入詞家的視野,並受到一定的推崇,而在晚清民初一躍成爲詞壇圭臬。箇中原因,耐人尋味,也可見夢窗詞獨特的魅力。道光詞壇的重要選本《宋四家詞選》和《宋七家詞選》等,以及一些相關的評論,都可視爲吴文英詞崛起的端倪。隨著論者對夢窗詞更深入的認知,他們在創作中對夢窗詞亦有一定程度的仿擬和化用。本文以這個時期爲日後“夢窗熱”之發端,並擬結合詞論,觀察周濟及吴中詞人在創作時對夢窗詞的摹習。
The article aims to examine the reception of a controversial poet, Wu Wenying 吴文英 (ca. 1200-ca. 1260), who was not highly regarded until after the Daoguan reign-period of the Qing dynasty (1820-1850), but quickly became the most influential figure in both the fields of critiques and creative writing. Despite the criticism, Wu continued to influence on the ci-poets in the 20th century, This article explores the beginning of Wu’s rising popularity by investigating important critics and poets who were active during the Daoguan era, namely Zhou Ji (1781-1839), Ge Zai (1786-1856), and Zhu Shou (1789-1840). By analyzing the circumstances that gave rise to the popularity of Wu and the ci-poems written in an attempt to emulate Mengchuang’s style, the article aims to learn how tradition was drawn upon and transformed, producing new meanings among late Qing poets.