PROSA:一个可读的机械化可调度性分析案例

Felipe Cerqueira, Felix Stutz, Björn B. Brandenburg
{"title":"PROSA:一个可读的机械化可调度性分析案例","authors":"Felipe Cerqueira, Felix Stutz, Björn B. Brandenburg","doi":"10.1109/ECRTS.2016.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motivated by a string of recent errata, the paper argues that mechanized, yet readable schedulability proofs are desirable, feasible to create with current tools and with reasonable effort, and beneficial beyond the increase in confidence. To facilitate such mechanized analyses, PROSA, a new open-source foundation for formally proven schedulability analyses that prioritizes readability, is presented. The approach is demonstrated with a case study that mechanizes multiprocessor response-time analysis, including new variants for parallel jobs and release jitter.","PeriodicalId":178974,"journal":{"name":"2016 28th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROSA: A Case for Readable Mechanized Schedulability Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Felipe Cerqueira, Felix Stutz, Björn B. Brandenburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECRTS.2016.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Motivated by a string of recent errata, the paper argues that mechanized, yet readable schedulability proofs are desirable, feasible to create with current tools and with reasonable effort, and beneficial beyond the increase in confidence. To facilitate such mechanized analyses, PROSA, a new open-source foundation for formally proven schedulability analyses that prioritizes readability, is presented. The approach is demonstrated with a case study that mechanizes multiprocessor response-time analysis, including new variants for parallel jobs and release jitter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 28th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 28th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECRTS.2016.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 28th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECRTS.2016.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

摘要

在一系列最近的勘误表的推动下,本文认为机械化的,但可读的可调度性证明是可取的,可以用当前的工具和合理的努力来创建,并且有益的不仅仅是增加信心。为了促进这种机械化分析,PROSA,一个新的开源基础,用于正式证明的可调度性分析,优先考虑可读性,被提出。该方法通过一个案例研究进行了演示,该案例研究实现了多处理器响应时间分析的机械化,包括并行作业和释放抖动的新变体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PROSA: A Case for Readable Mechanized Schedulability Analysis
Motivated by a string of recent errata, the paper argues that mechanized, yet readable schedulability proofs are desirable, feasible to create with current tools and with reasonable effort, and beneficial beyond the increase in confidence. To facilitate such mechanized analyses, PROSA, a new open-source foundation for formally proven schedulability analyses that prioritizes readability, is presented. The approach is demonstrated with a case study that mechanizes multiprocessor response-time analysis, including new variants for parallel jobs and release jitter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信