第十章:本土化、适应与反思:跨国跨文化TPC研究综述

Nancy Small
{"title":"第十章:本土化、适应与反思:跨国跨文化TPC研究综述","authors":"Nancy Small","doi":"10.37514/tpc-b.2022.1381.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technical and professional communication (TPC) has been a border-crossing field since its inception, and as globalization continues to create new avenues for research and practice, now is an opportune time to review what kinds of intercultural and transnational projects are being pursued as well as to consider how to be ethical agents in these projects. After relating the fraught process of defining “transnational” and “intercultural,” this chapter describes a meta-analysis of articles published in major TPC journals during a five-year window (2014-2018). The analysis categorizes different types of projects and seeks out advice emerging from scholars’ experiences. The study reveals a wide range of transnational research settings which resist being easily delimited and determines that space in journal articles to reflect on cross-cultural complexities is scarce. Limited reflections from scholars in cross-cultural projects indicate that working in intercultural and transnational spaces requires persistent localization, ongoing adaptation, and a reflective, reflexive mindset. Taken together, these lessons point to ongoing (re)positionality at the center of successful intercultural work. Based on the results of this review, the author recommends the field develop a formal statement of ethics for transnational and intercultural research. That ethic should be human-centered and mindful of social justice principles.","PeriodicalId":176047,"journal":{"name":"Assembling Critical Components: A Framework for Sustaining Technical and Professional Communication","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 10: Localize, Adapt, Reflect: A Review of Recent Research in Transnational and Intercultural TPC\",\"authors\":\"Nancy Small\",\"doi\":\"10.37514/tpc-b.2022.1381.2.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Technical and professional communication (TPC) has been a border-crossing field since its inception, and as globalization continues to create new avenues for research and practice, now is an opportune time to review what kinds of intercultural and transnational projects are being pursued as well as to consider how to be ethical agents in these projects. After relating the fraught process of defining “transnational” and “intercultural,” this chapter describes a meta-analysis of articles published in major TPC journals during a five-year window (2014-2018). The analysis categorizes different types of projects and seeks out advice emerging from scholars’ experiences. The study reveals a wide range of transnational research settings which resist being easily delimited and determines that space in journal articles to reflect on cross-cultural complexities is scarce. Limited reflections from scholars in cross-cultural projects indicate that working in intercultural and transnational spaces requires persistent localization, ongoing adaptation, and a reflective, reflexive mindset. Taken together, these lessons point to ongoing (re)positionality at the center of successful intercultural work. Based on the results of this review, the author recommends the field develop a formal statement of ethics for transnational and intercultural research. That ethic should be human-centered and mindful of social justice principles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assembling Critical Components: A Framework for Sustaining Technical and Professional Communication\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assembling Critical Components: A Framework for Sustaining Technical and Professional Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37514/tpc-b.2022.1381.2.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assembling Critical Components: A Framework for Sustaining Technical and Professional Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/tpc-b.2022.1381.2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

技术和专业交流(TPC)自成立以来一直是一个跨越边界的领域,随着全球化继续为研究和实践创造新的途径,现在是审查正在进行的跨文化和跨国项目以及考虑如何在这些项目中成为道德代理人的时机。在描述了定义“跨国”和“跨文化”的艰难过程之后,本章描述了对TPC主要期刊在五年窗口(2014-2018)期间发表的文章的荟萃分析。该分析对不同类型的项目进行了分类,并从学者的经验中寻求建议。该研究揭示了广泛的跨国研究环境,这些环境难以被轻易界定,并决定了期刊文章中反思跨文化复杂性的空间很少。学者在跨文化项目中的有限反思表明,在跨文化和跨国空间中工作需要持续的本地化、持续的适应和反思的心态。综上所述,这些经验表明,成功跨文化工作的核心是持续(重新)定位。基于这一综述的结果,作者建议该领域为跨国和跨文化研究制定一份正式的伦理声明。这种伦理应该以人为中心,并注意到社会正义原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chapter 10: Localize, Adapt, Reflect: A Review of Recent Research in Transnational and Intercultural TPC
Technical and professional communication (TPC) has been a border-crossing field since its inception, and as globalization continues to create new avenues for research and practice, now is an opportune time to review what kinds of intercultural and transnational projects are being pursued as well as to consider how to be ethical agents in these projects. After relating the fraught process of defining “transnational” and “intercultural,” this chapter describes a meta-analysis of articles published in major TPC journals during a five-year window (2014-2018). The analysis categorizes different types of projects and seeks out advice emerging from scholars’ experiences. The study reveals a wide range of transnational research settings which resist being easily delimited and determines that space in journal articles to reflect on cross-cultural complexities is scarce. Limited reflections from scholars in cross-cultural projects indicate that working in intercultural and transnational spaces requires persistent localization, ongoing adaptation, and a reflective, reflexive mindset. Taken together, these lessons point to ongoing (re)positionality at the center of successful intercultural work. Based on the results of this review, the author recommends the field develop a formal statement of ethics for transnational and intercultural research. That ethic should be human-centered and mindful of social justice principles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信