探究的终结

N. Ballantyne
{"title":"探究的终结","authors":"N. Ballantyne","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The method in this book may tell us we can’t gain reasonable beliefs or knowledge about the correct answers to controversial questions. But if that is what the method instructs us to do, does it undermine our motivation to inquire into controversial questions? This chapter considers the possibility that the method “demotivates” our investigation of difficult, controversial questions.","PeriodicalId":345622,"journal":{"name":"Knowing Our Limits","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The End of Inquiry\",\"authors\":\"N. Ballantyne\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The method in this book may tell us we can’t gain reasonable beliefs or knowledge about the correct answers to controversial questions. But if that is what the method instructs us to do, does it undermine our motivation to inquire into controversial questions? This chapter considers the possibility that the method “demotivates” our investigation of difficult, controversial questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knowing Our Limits\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knowing Our Limits\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowing Our Limits","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这本书中的方法可能告诉我们,我们无法获得关于有争议问题的正确答案的合理信念或知识。但是,如果这是这种方法指导我们去做的事情,它会削弱我们探究有争议问题的动机吗?这一章考虑了这种方法“削弱”我们对困难的、有争议的问题的研究的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The End of Inquiry
The method in this book may tell us we can’t gain reasonable beliefs or knowledge about the correct answers to controversial questions. But if that is what the method instructs us to do, does it undermine our motivation to inquire into controversial questions? This chapter considers the possibility that the method “demotivates” our investigation of difficult, controversial questions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信