油页岩储层注水注气提高采收率潜力评价

Yasir Shahzad
{"title":"油页岩储层注水注气提高采收率潜力评价","authors":"Yasir Shahzad","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2478558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From oils operators interests has been made by producing oil from unconventional shale reservoirs due to the relatively unpretentious natural gas price. The ultimate recovery of shale resources is still low from 5 to 10 percents assuming even though many incredible work on it has been done to develop shale resources. More and more production strategies and stimulation strategies are being tested and considered to sort out in the improvement of oil production from the shale reservoirs, as a result of the significant role of shale resources in the future oil and gas industry. As we know the simulation approach is an inexpensive and rapid approach to assess its EOR potential, thus there’s a need of conducting a research in laboratory and applying a precise method to enhance oil recovery (EOR) in the field. In designing field testing and laboratory experiments the synthesis of simulation outcome will be assistive. In this paper by waterflooding and by gas flooding, a simulation access to appraise the EOR potential in shale oil reservoirs has been used. By sensitivity studies the oil recovery and production behavior of various strategies and schemes has been discoursed. Simulation results and consequences of gas injection, water injection and primary production have been compared thoroughly. Study and results have shown that the water injection has a much lower potential to improve the oil recovery from that of a shale oil reservoirs whereas miscible gas injection has a higher potential. Above a minimum miscible pressure (MMP) Gas injection can be thoroughly miscible with oil, so decreasing or reducing the viscosity of oil significantly, also in accession to the mechanism of pressure maintenance. Oil recovery factor can be enhanced up to 15.1 percents by gas injection in a shale reservoir which is hydraulically fractured, are specified through the simulation results, whereas from the primary depletion the oil recovery factor is only 6.5 percents. The recovery of oil from gas flooding than from waterflooding is measured about 11.9 percents. The results have shown that the only way to enhance the recovery of oil from shale oil reservoir could be possible from that of miscible gas flooding.","PeriodicalId":311687,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Water Supply (Topic)","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Enhance Oil Recovery (EOR) Potential of Water and Gas Injection in Oil Shale Reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"Yasir Shahzad\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2478558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From oils operators interests has been made by producing oil from unconventional shale reservoirs due to the relatively unpretentious natural gas price. The ultimate recovery of shale resources is still low from 5 to 10 percents assuming even though many incredible work on it has been done to develop shale resources. More and more production strategies and stimulation strategies are being tested and considered to sort out in the improvement of oil production from the shale reservoirs, as a result of the significant role of shale resources in the future oil and gas industry. As we know the simulation approach is an inexpensive and rapid approach to assess its EOR potential, thus there’s a need of conducting a research in laboratory and applying a precise method to enhance oil recovery (EOR) in the field. In designing field testing and laboratory experiments the synthesis of simulation outcome will be assistive. In this paper by waterflooding and by gas flooding, a simulation access to appraise the EOR potential in shale oil reservoirs has been used. By sensitivity studies the oil recovery and production behavior of various strategies and schemes has been discoursed. Simulation results and consequences of gas injection, water injection and primary production have been compared thoroughly. Study and results have shown that the water injection has a much lower potential to improve the oil recovery from that of a shale oil reservoirs whereas miscible gas injection has a higher potential. Above a minimum miscible pressure (MMP) Gas injection can be thoroughly miscible with oil, so decreasing or reducing the viscosity of oil significantly, also in accession to the mechanism of pressure maintenance. Oil recovery factor can be enhanced up to 15.1 percents by gas injection in a shale reservoir which is hydraulically fractured, are specified through the simulation results, whereas from the primary depletion the oil recovery factor is only 6.5 percents. The recovery of oil from gas flooding than from waterflooding is measured about 11.9 percents. The results have shown that the only way to enhance the recovery of oil from shale oil reservoir could be possible from that of miscible gas flooding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Water Supply (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Water Supply (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2478558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Water Supply (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2478558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于天然气价格相对较低,从非常规页岩储层中开采石油已成为石油运营商的利益所在。尽管在开发页岩资源方面已经做了许多令人难以置信的工作,但页岩资源的最终采收率仍然很低,只有5%到10%。由于页岩资源在未来油气工业中的重要作用,越来越多的生产策略和增产策略正在被测试和考虑,以提高页岩储层的产量。正如我们所知,模拟方法是一种廉价且快速的方法来评估其EOR潜力,因此需要在实验室进行研究并应用精确的方法来提高油田的采收率(EOR)。在设计现场测试和实验室实验时,模拟结果的综合将是辅助的。本文采用水驱和气驱两种模拟方法,对页岩油藏进行了提高采收率潜力的评价。通过敏感性研究,论述了各种策略和方案的采收率和生产行为。对注气、注水和一次采油的模拟结果和结果进行了比较。研究结果表明,注水提高页岩油采收率的潜力要低得多,而注混相气的潜力要高得多。在最小混相压力(MMP)以上,注气可以与油完全混相,从而显著降低或降低油的粘度,也加入了保压机制。模拟结果表明,在水力压裂的页岩储层中,注气可使采收率提高15.1%,而在一次枯竭时,采收率仅为6.5%。气驱的采收率比水驱的采收率约为11.9%。结果表明,提高页岩油层采收率的唯一途径是进行混相气驱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Enhance Oil Recovery (EOR) Potential of Water and Gas Injection in Oil Shale Reservoirs
From oils operators interests has been made by producing oil from unconventional shale reservoirs due to the relatively unpretentious natural gas price. The ultimate recovery of shale resources is still low from 5 to 10 percents assuming even though many incredible work on it has been done to develop shale resources. More and more production strategies and stimulation strategies are being tested and considered to sort out in the improvement of oil production from the shale reservoirs, as a result of the significant role of shale resources in the future oil and gas industry. As we know the simulation approach is an inexpensive and rapid approach to assess its EOR potential, thus there’s a need of conducting a research in laboratory and applying a precise method to enhance oil recovery (EOR) in the field. In designing field testing and laboratory experiments the synthesis of simulation outcome will be assistive. In this paper by waterflooding and by gas flooding, a simulation access to appraise the EOR potential in shale oil reservoirs has been used. By sensitivity studies the oil recovery and production behavior of various strategies and schemes has been discoursed. Simulation results and consequences of gas injection, water injection and primary production have been compared thoroughly. Study and results have shown that the water injection has a much lower potential to improve the oil recovery from that of a shale oil reservoirs whereas miscible gas injection has a higher potential. Above a minimum miscible pressure (MMP) Gas injection can be thoroughly miscible with oil, so decreasing or reducing the viscosity of oil significantly, also in accession to the mechanism of pressure maintenance. Oil recovery factor can be enhanced up to 15.1 percents by gas injection in a shale reservoir which is hydraulically fractured, are specified through the simulation results, whereas from the primary depletion the oil recovery factor is only 6.5 percents. The recovery of oil from gas flooding than from waterflooding is measured about 11.9 percents. The results have shown that the only way to enhance the recovery of oil from shale oil reservoir could be possible from that of miscible gas flooding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信