媒介政治:追求最小效应还是最大效应的质疑?

Fiandy Mauliansyah, S. Asra
{"title":"媒介政治:追求最小效应还是最大效应的质疑?","authors":"Fiandy Mauliansyah, S. Asra","doi":"10.2991/AGC-18.2019.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mass media with its ability to construct reality, allegedly influence the political situation in society. Various theoretical studies of communication have even formulated several possible effects that the media can contribute to the flow of political activity. Some of the literature reviews in relations with political communication and the media shows a strong tendency of the relationship between them. But the things are different now. The strength of the media which was originally considered strong (strong effect) is now experiencing a decrease in strength (minimal effect). This kind of paradigm shift can be seen in the 2014 legislative elections. This paper wants to explain changes in trends in media effects. By using the comparison of the 2004, 2009, and 2014 election period, the tendency of the media's minimal effects to be seen in the 2014 election, the measurement can be seen from five aspects, namely; effect size, media outlet, theoretical approach, partisan media, and audience. From these five aspects, we get a picture of the tendency of changes in media effects in the 2004 and 2009 election periods which are relatively stronger (strong effect) to tend to be minimal (minimal effect) in the 2014 election period. One of the variables used is the amount of advertising spending and the acquisition of parliamentary seats. Keywords—politics of media; media effect; minimal and maximum effect","PeriodicalId":258200,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018)","volume":"40 32","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Politics of Media, Questioning for Minimum or Maximum Effect?\",\"authors\":\"Fiandy Mauliansyah, S. Asra\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/AGC-18.2019.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The mass media with its ability to construct reality, allegedly influence the political situation in society. Various theoretical studies of communication have even formulated several possible effects that the media can contribute to the flow of political activity. Some of the literature reviews in relations with political communication and the media shows a strong tendency of the relationship between them. But the things are different now. The strength of the media which was originally considered strong (strong effect) is now experiencing a decrease in strength (minimal effect). This kind of paradigm shift can be seen in the 2014 legislative elections. This paper wants to explain changes in trends in media effects. By using the comparison of the 2004, 2009, and 2014 election period, the tendency of the media's minimal effects to be seen in the 2014 election, the measurement can be seen from five aspects, namely; effect size, media outlet, theoretical approach, partisan media, and audience. From these five aspects, we get a picture of the tendency of changes in media effects in the 2004 and 2009 election periods which are relatively stronger (strong effect) to tend to be minimal (minimal effect) in the 2014 election period. One of the variables used is the amount of advertising spending and the acquisition of parliamentary seats. Keywords—politics of media; media effect; minimal and maximum effect\",\"PeriodicalId\":258200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018)\",\"volume\":\"40 32\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/AGC-18.2019.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/AGC-18.2019.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大众传媒以其建构现实的能力,据称影响着社会的政治局势。关于传播的各种理论研究甚至提出了媒体对政治活动流动可能产生的几种影响。一些关于政治传播与媒介关系的文献综述显示出强烈的政治传播与媒介关系倾向。但现在情况不同了。原本被认为很强的介质强度(强效应)现在正在经历强度的下降(最小效应)。这种模式的转变可以在2014年的立法会选举中看到。本文想要解释媒体效应趋势的变化。通过对2004年、2009年和2014年大选期间的比较,可以看出媒体在2014年大选中发挥最小影响的趋势,可以从五个方面来衡量,即;效应大小、媒体渠道、理论方法、党派媒体和受众。从这五个方面,我们可以看到2004年和2009年选举期间媒体效应的变化趋势,即在2014年选举期间媒体效应相对较强(强效应),而在2014年选举期间媒体效应趋于最小(最小效应)。所使用的变量之一是广告支出和获得议会席位的数量。关键词:媒介政治;媒体效果;最小和最大影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Politics of Media, Questioning for Minimum or Maximum Effect?
The mass media with its ability to construct reality, allegedly influence the political situation in society. Various theoretical studies of communication have even formulated several possible effects that the media can contribute to the flow of political activity. Some of the literature reviews in relations with political communication and the media shows a strong tendency of the relationship between them. But the things are different now. The strength of the media which was originally considered strong (strong effect) is now experiencing a decrease in strength (minimal effect). This kind of paradigm shift can be seen in the 2014 legislative elections. This paper wants to explain changes in trends in media effects. By using the comparison of the 2004, 2009, and 2014 election period, the tendency of the media's minimal effects to be seen in the 2014 election, the measurement can be seen from five aspects, namely; effect size, media outlet, theoretical approach, partisan media, and audience. From these five aspects, we get a picture of the tendency of changes in media effects in the 2004 and 2009 election periods which are relatively stronger (strong effect) to tend to be minimal (minimal effect) in the 2014 election period. One of the variables used is the amount of advertising spending and the acquisition of parliamentary seats. Keywords—politics of media; media effect; minimal and maximum effect
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信