公钥加密如何影响无线传感器节点寿命

K. Piotrowski, P. Langendörfer, Steffen Peter
{"title":"公钥加密如何影响无线传感器节点寿命","authors":"K. Piotrowski, P. Langendörfer, Steffen Peter","doi":"10.1145/1180345.1180366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we try to estimate the real influence of public key cryptography (PKC) to the lifetime of a sensor node in wireless sensor networks. We investigate four types of nodes; MICA2DOT, MICA2, MICAz and TelosB. For all these nodes we estimate the power consumption for most common RSA and ECC operations, i.e., signature generation and verification as well as key exchange mechanisms. We also estimate the power consumed by the transmission of their results. Our results show that the application of strong cryptography is feasible. Even for the most constrained node performing the ECC-160 signature once every 10 minutes increases the duty cycle only by about 0.5 per cent, i.e., the influence to the lifetime is not significant. Nevertheless, the public key cryptography shall be used with care.","PeriodicalId":380051,"journal":{"name":"ACM Workshop on Security of ad hoc and Sensor Networks","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"251","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How public key cryptography influences wireless sensor node lifetime\",\"authors\":\"K. Piotrowski, P. Langendörfer, Steffen Peter\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1180345.1180366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we try to estimate the real influence of public key cryptography (PKC) to the lifetime of a sensor node in wireless sensor networks. We investigate four types of nodes; MICA2DOT, MICA2, MICAz and TelosB. For all these nodes we estimate the power consumption for most common RSA and ECC operations, i.e., signature generation and verification as well as key exchange mechanisms. We also estimate the power consumed by the transmission of their results. Our results show that the application of strong cryptography is feasible. Even for the most constrained node performing the ECC-160 signature once every 10 minutes increases the duty cycle only by about 0.5 per cent, i.e., the influence to the lifetime is not significant. Nevertheless, the public key cryptography shall be used with care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Workshop on Security of ad hoc and Sensor Networks\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"251\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Workshop on Security of ad hoc and Sensor Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1180345.1180366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Workshop on Security of ad hoc and Sensor Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1180345.1180366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 251

摘要

在本文中,我们试图估计公钥加密(PKC)对无线传感器网络中传感器节点生命周期的实际影响。我们研究了四种类型的节点;MICA2DOT, MICA2, MICAz和TelosB。对于所有这些节点,我们估计了最常见的RSA和ECC操作的功耗,即签名生成和验证以及密钥交换机制。我们还估计了传输结果所消耗的功率。结果表明,强密码学的应用是可行的。即使对于每10分钟执行一次ECC-160签名的最受约束的节点,其占空比也仅增加约0.5%,即对寿命的影响并不显著。尽管如此,公钥加密应使用还是要小心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How public key cryptography influences wireless sensor node lifetime
In this paper we try to estimate the real influence of public key cryptography (PKC) to the lifetime of a sensor node in wireless sensor networks. We investigate four types of nodes; MICA2DOT, MICA2, MICAz and TelosB. For all these nodes we estimate the power consumption for most common RSA and ECC operations, i.e., signature generation and verification as well as key exchange mechanisms. We also estimate the power consumed by the transmission of their results. Our results show that the application of strong cryptography is feasible. Even for the most constrained node performing the ECC-160 signature once every 10 minutes increases the duty cycle only by about 0.5 per cent, i.e., the influence to the lifetime is not significant. Nevertheless, the public key cryptography shall be used with care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信