抗抑郁药的最新分类:简化治疗的建议

Sebastian A. Alvano , Luis M. Zieher
{"title":"抗抑郁药的最新分类:简化治疗的建议","authors":"Sebastian A. Alvano ,&nbsp;Luis M. Zieher","doi":"10.1016/j.pmip.2019.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>An exhaustive review of the main worldwide psychiatry-related literature sources shows that the present antidepressants’ classification does not have a logical and epistemic nomenclature oriented to allow a quick recognition of main adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and pharmacodynamic interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was performed in two phases. In the first, a new classification of antidepressants was built up based on their mechanisms of action. Furthermore, relevant ADRs and pharmacodynamic interactions were grouped according to their causal mechanisms.</p><p>In the second phase a comparative, prospective, longitudinal, experimental and randomized study was performed.</p><p>312 physicians who were great prescribers of antidepressants were randomly assigned to one of two groups, A and B, having 156 physicians each. Each group was assessed with a questionnaire evaluating basic knowledge of the most important ADRs and pharmacodynamic interactions. This questionnaire was provided before and after the assignment of a standard classification (group A) or the new classification (group B). In the questionnaire provided after the assignments, some questions about different acceptance variables were included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After handing the classifications, significant differences were found (p = 0.0008) in the number of correct answers in the second questionnaire, in favor of group B. In addition, analysis of acceptance variables showed significant differences between both groups, in favor of the new classification.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study shows that the new classification of antidepressants allows, in contrast with the standard classifications, to quickly inform and enable physicians to easily relate each drug to important ADRs and pharmacodynamic interactions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19837,"journal":{"name":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100042"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pmip.2019.04.002","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An updated classification of antidepressants: A proposal to simplify treatment\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian A. Alvano ,&nbsp;Luis M. Zieher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmip.2019.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>An exhaustive review of the main worldwide psychiatry-related literature sources shows that the present antidepressants’ classification does not have a logical and epistemic nomenclature oriented to allow a quick recognition of main adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and pharmacodynamic interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was performed in two phases. In the first, a new classification of antidepressants was built up based on their mechanisms of action. Furthermore, relevant ADRs and pharmacodynamic interactions were grouped according to their causal mechanisms.</p><p>In the second phase a comparative, prospective, longitudinal, experimental and randomized study was performed.</p><p>312 physicians who were great prescribers of antidepressants were randomly assigned to one of two groups, A and B, having 156 physicians each. Each group was assessed with a questionnaire evaluating basic knowledge of the most important ADRs and pharmacodynamic interactions. This questionnaire was provided before and after the assignment of a standard classification (group A) or the new classification (group B). In the questionnaire provided after the assignments, some questions about different acceptance variables were included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After handing the classifications, significant differences were found (p = 0.0008) in the number of correct answers in the second questionnaire, in favor of group B. In addition, analysis of acceptance variables showed significant differences between both groups, in favor of the new classification.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study shows that the new classification of antidepressants allows, in contrast with the standard classifications, to quickly inform and enable physicians to easily relate each drug to important ADRs and pharmacodynamic interactions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pmip.2019.04.002\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171718300280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171718300280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

背景:对世界范围内与精神病学相关的主要文献来源的详尽回顾表明,目前抗抑郁药的分类没有一个逻辑和知识上的命名法,无法快速识别主要的药物不良反应(adr)和药效学相互作用。方法本研究分两期进行。首先,根据抗抑郁药的作用机制,建立了一种新的抗抑郁药分类。此外,将相关不良反应和药效学相互作用按其因果机制进行分组。在第二阶段进行了一项比较、前瞻性、纵向、实验性和随机研究。312名擅长开抗抑郁药的医生被随机分为A组和B组,每组156名医生。对每组进行问卷调查,评估最重要的不良反应和药效学相互作用的基本知识。该问卷在分配标准分类(a组)或新分类(B组)前后提供。在分配后提供的问卷中,包含了一些关于不同接受变量的问题。结果处理分类后,第二份问卷的正确答案数有显著性差异(p = 0.0008),有利于b组。此外,接受变量分析显示,两组之间存在显著性差异,有利于新分类。结论与标准分类相比,新的抗抑郁药物分类可以快速告知医生,并使医生能够轻松地将每种药物与重要的不良反应和药效学相互作用联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An updated classification of antidepressants: A proposal to simplify treatment

Background

An exhaustive review of the main worldwide psychiatry-related literature sources shows that the present antidepressants’ classification does not have a logical and epistemic nomenclature oriented to allow a quick recognition of main adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and pharmacodynamic interactions.

Methods

The study was performed in two phases. In the first, a new classification of antidepressants was built up based on their mechanisms of action. Furthermore, relevant ADRs and pharmacodynamic interactions were grouped according to their causal mechanisms.

In the second phase a comparative, prospective, longitudinal, experimental and randomized study was performed.

312 physicians who were great prescribers of antidepressants were randomly assigned to one of two groups, A and B, having 156 physicians each. Each group was assessed with a questionnaire evaluating basic knowledge of the most important ADRs and pharmacodynamic interactions. This questionnaire was provided before and after the assignment of a standard classification (group A) or the new classification (group B). In the questionnaire provided after the assignments, some questions about different acceptance variables were included.

Results

After handing the classifications, significant differences were found (p = 0.0008) in the number of correct answers in the second questionnaire, in favor of group B. In addition, analysis of acceptance variables showed significant differences between both groups, in favor of the new classification.

Conclusion

This study shows that the new classification of antidepressants allows, in contrast with the standard classifications, to quickly inform and enable physicians to easily relate each drug to important ADRs and pharmacodynamic interactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信