家族记忆和历史身份:它们可以被视为定义身份的好方法吗

V. Syrov
{"title":"家族记忆和历史身份:它们可以被视为定义身份的好方法吗","authors":"V. Syrov","doi":"10.15826/tetm.2023.1.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the problem of defining modern forms of identity. As conditions for its formation, the potential of family memory and the past as a whole is analyzed. The prospects of historical identity as a way of forming modern identity are determined. It is argued that in a situation of dominance and justification of intergenerational gaps, family memory cannot be considered a necessary condition for the formation of an identity that claims to be public and universal. It is argued that historical identity in the context of the preservation and spread of national identity also cannot become a necessary and universal form of modern identity. In conclusion, the thesis is put forward that moral identity should be considered the preferred way of identity formation.","PeriodicalId":269039,"journal":{"name":"Tempus et Memoria","volume":"35 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family Memory and Historical Identity: can they be Considered Good Ways to Define Identity\",\"authors\":\"V. Syrov\",\"doi\":\"10.15826/tetm.2023.1.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses the problem of defining modern forms of identity. As conditions for its formation, the potential of family memory and the past as a whole is analyzed. The prospects of historical identity as a way of forming modern identity are determined. It is argued that in a situation of dominance and justification of intergenerational gaps, family memory cannot be considered a necessary condition for the formation of an identity that claims to be public and universal. It is argued that historical identity in the context of the preservation and spread of national identity also cannot become a necessary and universal form of modern identity. In conclusion, the thesis is put forward that moral identity should be considered the preferred way of identity formation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tempus et Memoria\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tempus et Memoria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15826/tetm.2023.1.040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tempus et Memoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/tetm.2023.1.040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了界定现代身份形式的问题。作为其形成的条件,分析了家庭记忆和过去作为一个整体的潜力。历史认同作为形成现代认同的一种方式的前景是确定的。本文认为,在代际差距占主导地位和正当性的情况下,家庭记忆不能被认为是形成一种声称是公共和普遍的身份的必要条件。本文认为,民族认同的保存和传播背景下的历史认同也不能成为现代认同的必要和普遍形式。最后,本文提出应将道德认同视为身份形成的首选方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family Memory and Historical Identity: can they be Considered Good Ways to Define Identity
The article discusses the problem of defining modern forms of identity. As conditions for its formation, the potential of family memory and the past as a whole is analyzed. The prospects of historical identity as a way of forming modern identity are determined. It is argued that in a situation of dominance and justification of intergenerational gaps, family memory cannot be considered a necessary condition for the formation of an identity that claims to be public and universal. It is argued that historical identity in the context of the preservation and spread of national identity also cannot become a necessary and universal form of modern identity. In conclusion, the thesis is put forward that moral identity should be considered the preferred way of identity formation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信