金融工程在传统风险管理方法中的不足分析

Yu-Shan Xue
{"title":"金融工程在传统风险管理方法中的不足分析","authors":"Yu-Shan Xue","doi":"10.2991/AEBMR.K.210210.082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the progress of science and technology, in order to ensure the risk management, financial engineering has emerged. Among them, the effectiveness of risk management activities is directly related to the stability of cash flow. Financial engineering broadens people's thinking and reduces the cost of investment risk. The most important thing is to prevent social and economic friction to improve financial efficiency. This article will briefly compare financial engineering and traditional risk management in the three aspects of insurance, asset & liability management and portfolio investment to analyze the comparative advantages of financial engineering.","PeriodicalId":373030,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2020)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Shortcomings of Financial Engineering in Traditional Risk Management Methods\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Shan Xue\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/AEBMR.K.210210.082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the progress of science and technology, in order to ensure the risk management, financial engineering has emerged. Among them, the effectiveness of risk management activities is directly related to the stability of cash flow. Financial engineering broadens people's thinking and reduces the cost of investment risk. The most important thing is to prevent social and economic friction to improve financial efficiency. This article will briefly compare financial engineering and traditional risk management in the three aspects of insurance, asset & liability management and portfolio investment to analyze the comparative advantages of financial engineering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2020)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/AEBMR.K.210210.082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/AEBMR.K.210210.082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着科技的进步,为了保证风险管理,金融工程应运而生。其中,风险管理活动的有效性直接关系到现金流的稳定性。金融工程拓宽了人们的思维,降低了投资风险的成本。最重要的是防止社会经济摩擦,提高金融效率。本文将在保险、资产负债管理和证券投资三个方面对金融工程与传统风险管理进行简要比较,分析金融工程的比较优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the Shortcomings of Financial Engineering in Traditional Risk Management Methods
With the progress of science and technology, in order to ensure the risk management, financial engineering has emerged. Among them, the effectiveness of risk management activities is directly related to the stability of cash flow. Financial engineering broadens people's thinking and reduces the cost of investment risk. The most important thing is to prevent social and economic friction to improve financial efficiency. This article will briefly compare financial engineering and traditional risk management in the three aspects of insurance, asset & liability management and portfolio investment to analyze the comparative advantages of financial engineering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信