Jimmie Svensson
{"title":"Poeter versus skådespelare i Dagens dikt 2020–2021","authors":"Jimmie Svensson","doi":"10.54797/tfl.v52i2-3.6973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Poets versus Actors Reading Poetry on Swedish Radio 2020–2021”\nFollowing the rise of the poet as the principal performer of his or her own work, in the second half of the 20th century, actors have been criticized for performing poetry as if acting on stage, or for focusing too much on conveying the lyric I. This primarily quantitative study investigates what prosodic differences there are between poets and actors reading poetry. The material consists of 276 readings from the Swedish public radio program Dagens dikt (The Daily Poem), from 2020 and 2021. A set of prosodic measures are produced for each recording with computational aid, and the groups are compared by using descriptive statistics. The differences found in terms of tempo and pausal patterns, though small, suggest that the actors read in a conventionally poetic, expressive style, while the poets are closer to a style typical of prose reading and conversational speech; this might be connected to differences between their respective repertoire – the poets reading newer, longer, and possibly more narrative texts. When it comes to pitch, there are more substantial differences: the poets are more monotonous and their tonal patterns more predictable, indicating a formal, less expressive style. These traits are associated with the highly stylized vocal cliché Poet Voice, which in turn is connected to poetological shifts in the last few decades. In both groups, however, younger individuals (born 1970 or later) and women, respectively, are the more monotonous and predictable; this might suggest a sociolinguistic trend not limited to poetry. Qualitative, close listening to a selection of readings largely confirms the findings of the quantitative investigation. While the frequently idiosyncratic poets tend to highlight form, such as rhythm and tonal repetitions, the actors rather try to convey the content of the poem, in accordance with prosodical and performative conventions.","PeriodicalId":202881,"journal":{"name":"Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54797/tfl.v52i2-3.6973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着诗人作为自己作品的主要表演者的兴起,在20世纪下半叶,演员被批评为像在舞台上表演一样表演诗歌,或者过于专注于传达抒情一。这项主要的定量研究调查了诗人和演员读诗之间的韵律差异。这些材料包括瑞典公共广播节目《每日诗歌》(Dagens dikt)从2020年到2021年的276个朗读。使用计算辅助为每个记录生成一组韵律测量,并使用描述性统计对这些组进行比较。在节奏和停顿模式方面发现的差异虽然很小,但表明演员以传统的诗意,表达风格阅读,而诗人更接近散文阅读和会话演讲的典型风格;这可能与他们各自曲目的差异有关——诗人阅读的是更新、更长、可能更具叙述性的文本。在音高方面,有更实质性的差异:诗人更单调,他们的音调模式更可预测,表明一种正式的、缺乏表现力的风格。这些特征与高度风格化的声乐陈词滥调《诗人之声》有关,而这又与过去几十年诗歌的转变有关。然而,在这两个群体中,年轻人(1970年或以后出生)和女性分别是更单调和可预测的;这可能表明,社会语言学的趋势并不局限于诗歌。定性的,仔细听一段精选的阅读材料在很大程度上证实了定量调查的结果。虽然经常特立独行的诗人倾向于强调形式,如节奏和音调的重复,但演员更倾向于按照韵律和表演惯例来传达诗歌的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poeter versus skådespelare i Dagens dikt 2020–2021
“Poets versus Actors Reading Poetry on Swedish Radio 2020–2021” Following the rise of the poet as the principal performer of his or her own work, in the second half of the 20th century, actors have been criticized for performing poetry as if acting on stage, or for focusing too much on conveying the lyric I. This primarily quantitative study investigates what prosodic differences there are between poets and actors reading poetry. The material consists of 276 readings from the Swedish public radio program Dagens dikt (The Daily Poem), from 2020 and 2021. A set of prosodic measures are produced for each recording with computational aid, and the groups are compared by using descriptive statistics. The differences found in terms of tempo and pausal patterns, though small, suggest that the actors read in a conventionally poetic, expressive style, while the poets are closer to a style typical of prose reading and conversational speech; this might be connected to differences between their respective repertoire – the poets reading newer, longer, and possibly more narrative texts. When it comes to pitch, there are more substantial differences: the poets are more monotonous and their tonal patterns more predictable, indicating a formal, less expressive style. These traits are associated with the highly stylized vocal cliché Poet Voice, which in turn is connected to poetological shifts in the last few decades. In both groups, however, younger individuals (born 1970 or later) and women, respectively, are the more monotonous and predictable; this might suggest a sociolinguistic trend not limited to poetry. Qualitative, close listening to a selection of readings largely confirms the findings of the quantitative investigation. While the frequently idiosyncratic poets tend to highlight form, such as rhythm and tonal repetitions, the actors rather try to convey the content of the poem, in accordance with prosodical and performative conventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信