以内容为中心的住宅社区网络的能源足迹

R. Garroppo, G. Nencioni, G. Procissi, L. Tavanti
{"title":"以内容为中心的住宅社区网络的能源足迹","authors":"R. Garroppo, G. Nencioni, G. Procissi, L. Tavanti","doi":"10.1109/TIWDC.2013.6664193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents a comparison between various approaches to the optimized operation of a Content Centric Residential Community Network (CCRCN). The evaluation basis is mostly about the energy footprint of CCRCNs, but other factors, such as content offloading and Internet Sharing, are also taken into account. From the analysis it emerges that the current approaches to operate a CCRCN are not very profitable in terms of energy. Some produce very marginal savings, whereas the behaviour of others is strongly dependent on the operational conditions, thus being scarcely predictable. We thus point out the strengths and weaknesses of each, thus paving the way for the future greening strategies of CCRCNs.","PeriodicalId":158112,"journal":{"name":"2013 24th Tyrrhenian International Workshop on Digital Communications - Green ICT (TIWDC)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The energy footprint of Content-Centric Residential Community Networks\",\"authors\":\"R. Garroppo, G. Nencioni, G. Procissi, L. Tavanti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TIWDC.2013.6664193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents a comparison between various approaches to the optimized operation of a Content Centric Residential Community Network (CCRCN). The evaluation basis is mostly about the energy footprint of CCRCNs, but other factors, such as content offloading and Internet Sharing, are also taken into account. From the analysis it emerges that the current approaches to operate a CCRCN are not very profitable in terms of energy. Some produce very marginal savings, whereas the behaviour of others is strongly dependent on the operational conditions, thus being scarcely predictable. We thus point out the strengths and weaknesses of each, thus paving the way for the future greening strategies of CCRCNs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 24th Tyrrhenian International Workshop on Digital Communications - Green ICT (TIWDC)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 24th Tyrrhenian International Workshop on Digital Communications - Green ICT (TIWDC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIWDC.2013.6664193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 24th Tyrrhenian International Workshop on Digital Communications - Green ICT (TIWDC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIWDC.2013.6664193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文对以内容为中心的住宅社区网络(CCRCN)优化运行的各种方法进行了比较。评价依据主要是CCRCNs的能源足迹,但也考虑了其他因素,如内容卸载和互联网共享。从分析中可以看出,就能源而言,目前运营CCRCN的方法并不是很有利可图。有些公司节省的资金非常少,而另一些公司的行为很大程度上取决于运营条件,因此很难预测。指出了各自的优势和不足,从而为CCRCNs未来的绿化战略铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The energy footprint of Content-Centric Residential Community Networks
The paper presents a comparison between various approaches to the optimized operation of a Content Centric Residential Community Network (CCRCN). The evaluation basis is mostly about the energy footprint of CCRCNs, but other factors, such as content offloading and Internet Sharing, are also taken into account. From the analysis it emerges that the current approaches to operate a CCRCN are not very profitable in terms of energy. Some produce very marginal savings, whereas the behaviour of others is strongly dependent on the operational conditions, thus being scarcely predictable. We thus point out the strengths and weaknesses of each, thus paving the way for the future greening strategies of CCRCNs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信