非殖民化参与式设计:纳米比亚的记忆制作

R. C. Smith, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, Asnath Paula Kambunga, S. Krishnamurthy
{"title":"非殖民化参与式设计:纳米比亚的记忆制作","authors":"R. C. Smith, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, Asnath Paula Kambunga, S. Krishnamurthy","doi":"10.1145/3385010.3385021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participatory Design (PD) approaches seem particularly well suited to contribute to debates over power and decolonization in design, yet often lack considerations of cultural situatedness and underlying ontological entanglements. In this paper we identify theoretical and methodological gaps in PD relating to contemporary discourses of decolonizing design. We integrate perspectives from PD and postcolonial discourse to explore how we can create more far-reaching examples of decolonizing design in practice. We present a study in which young Namibians are at the forefront of knowledge production on postcolonial memories and contribute to discussions of how decolonizing PD practices may be developed through contextualized, transdisciplinary, and transcultural approaches. In particular, we argue there is a need for a “safe space,” as well as continuing reflection on methods and de-linking of knowledge and epistemologies within the PD process itself.","PeriodicalId":137886,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decolonizing Participatory Design: Memory Making in Namibia\",\"authors\":\"R. C. Smith, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, Asnath Paula Kambunga, S. Krishnamurthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3385010.3385021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Participatory Design (PD) approaches seem particularly well suited to contribute to debates over power and decolonization in design, yet often lack considerations of cultural situatedness and underlying ontological entanglements. In this paper we identify theoretical and methodological gaps in PD relating to contemporary discourses of decolonizing design. We integrate perspectives from PD and postcolonial discourse to explore how we can create more far-reaching examples of decolonizing design in practice. We present a study in which young Namibians are at the forefront of knowledge production on postcolonial memories and contribute to discussions of how decolonizing PD practices may be developed through contextualized, transdisciplinary, and transcultural approaches. In particular, we argue there is a need for a “safe space,” as well as continuing reflection on methods and de-linking of knowledge and epistemologies within the PD process itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

参与式设计(PD)方法似乎特别适合于对设计中的权力和非殖民化进行辩论,但通常缺乏对文化情境和潜在本体论纠缠的考虑。在本文中,我们确定了PD与当代非殖民化设计话语的理论和方法差距。我们整合PD和后殖民话语的观点,探索如何在实践中创造更深远的非殖民化设计实例。我们提出了一项研究,其中年轻的纳米比亚人处于后殖民记忆知识生产的最前沿,并有助于讨论如何通过情境化,跨学科和跨文化的方法来发展非殖民化PD实践。特别是,我们认为需要一个“安全空间”,以及继续反思PD过程本身的方法和知识与认识论的分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decolonizing Participatory Design: Memory Making in Namibia
Participatory Design (PD) approaches seem particularly well suited to contribute to debates over power and decolonization in design, yet often lack considerations of cultural situatedness and underlying ontological entanglements. In this paper we identify theoretical and methodological gaps in PD relating to contemporary discourses of decolonizing design. We integrate perspectives from PD and postcolonial discourse to explore how we can create more far-reaching examples of decolonizing design in practice. We present a study in which young Namibians are at the forefront of knowledge production on postcolonial memories and contribute to discussions of how decolonizing PD practices may be developed through contextualized, transdisciplinary, and transcultural approaches. In particular, we argue there is a need for a “safe space,” as well as continuing reflection on methods and de-linking of knowledge and epistemologies within the PD process itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信