医学知识的建构:过程的语义分类

R. Mocini
{"title":"医学知识的建构:过程的语义分类","authors":"R. Mocini","doi":"10.19044/llc.v9no3a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The semiotic reality of medical discourse is linguistically organised into figures arranged in the grammar of the clause. Each clause is comprised of entities and processes in various relationships to each other. The writers of medical texts represent and bestow meaning on their experience of the world by choosing from among a selection of different types of figures: of happening, sensing, doing, being, having, and saying. Processes play a central role in figures since they provide their own models for construing the experiential content and organising the information flow of medical texts. The rich architecture of Systemic Functional Linguistics can provide the theoretical background and analytical tools for a thorough investigation of the linguistic selections made by medical writers to convey clinical knowledge. Considering this key role, the present paper aims at investigating the most frequent verbs used as processes in a corpus of medical research articles. The study reveals that the most recurrent verbs used as processes in this type of textual configuration share semantic features. This makes it possible to propose a taxonomic approach to processes with a view to studying their grammatical configuration and the discourse functions they serve.","PeriodicalId":243248,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Construction of Medical Knowledge: A Semantic Taxonomy of Processes\",\"authors\":\"R. Mocini\",\"doi\":\"10.19044/llc.v9no3a1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The semiotic reality of medical discourse is linguistically organised into figures arranged in the grammar of the clause. Each clause is comprised of entities and processes in various relationships to each other. The writers of medical texts represent and bestow meaning on their experience of the world by choosing from among a selection of different types of figures: of happening, sensing, doing, being, having, and saying. Processes play a central role in figures since they provide their own models for construing the experiential content and organising the information flow of medical texts. The rich architecture of Systemic Functional Linguistics can provide the theoretical background and analytical tools for a thorough investigation of the linguistic selections made by medical writers to convey clinical knowledge. Considering this key role, the present paper aims at investigating the most frequent verbs used as processes in a corpus of medical research articles. The study reveals that the most recurrent verbs used as processes in this type of textual configuration share semantic features. This makes it possible to propose a taxonomic approach to processes with a view to studying their grammatical configuration and the discourse functions they serve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19044/llc.v9no3a1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19044/llc.v9no3a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学话语的符号学现实在语言上被组织成分句语法中排列的数字。每个子句都由实体和过程组成,它们之间的关系各不相同。医学文本的作者通过从一系列不同类型的数字中进行选择来表现和赋予他们对世界的体验意义:发生的、感觉的、做的、存在的、拥有的和说的。过程在数字中起着核心作用,因为它们为构建经验内容和组织医学文本的信息流提供了自己的模型。系统功能语言学丰富的体系结构可以为深入研究医学作者为传达临床知识而选择的语言提供理论背景和分析工具。考虑到这一关键作用,本文旨在调查医学研究文章语料库中用作过程的最常见动词。研究表明,在这种类型的文本结构中,作为过程使用的大多数重复动词具有共同的语义特征。这使得有可能提出一种分类学方法来研究过程的语法结构和它们所服务的话语功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Construction of Medical Knowledge: A Semantic Taxonomy of Processes
The semiotic reality of medical discourse is linguistically organised into figures arranged in the grammar of the clause. Each clause is comprised of entities and processes in various relationships to each other. The writers of medical texts represent and bestow meaning on their experience of the world by choosing from among a selection of different types of figures: of happening, sensing, doing, being, having, and saying. Processes play a central role in figures since they provide their own models for construing the experiential content and organising the information flow of medical texts. The rich architecture of Systemic Functional Linguistics can provide the theoretical background and analytical tools for a thorough investigation of the linguistic selections made by medical writers to convey clinical knowledge. Considering this key role, the present paper aims at investigating the most frequent verbs used as processes in a corpus of medical research articles. The study reveals that the most recurrent verbs used as processes in this type of textual configuration share semantic features. This makes it possible to propose a taxonomic approach to processes with a view to studying their grammatical configuration and the discourse functions they serve.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信