学业焦虑问卷编制的内容效度和结构效度

Ahsanul Khair Asdar, Muawanah Muawanah
{"title":"学业焦虑问卷编制的内容效度和结构效度","authors":"Ahsanul Khair Asdar, Muawanah Muawanah","doi":"10.21009/jisae.v7i2.25889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was a research and development which aimed to develop an academic anxiety questionnaire for students through content validity and construct validity testing using ADDIE model. This research involved 205 students in the first trial phase and 220 students in the second trial phase. They were selected using the cluster random sampling method. The data were collected using a survey method by distributing the questionnaires using the google form. The results showed that the academic anxiety questionnaire was developed by containing the dimensions of cognitive symptoms, emotional symptoms, and physical symptoms. The coefficient of content validity through the Aiken's V by four experts for each item was more than 0.200, while the reliability was 0.893. The first trial phase showed that eight items dropped through the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with Construct Reliability (CR) and Variance Extracted (VE) values ​​for each measurement model were 0.881 and 0.202, while the CR and VE values for the structural model ​​were 0.888 and 0.730. The second trial phase showed that four items dropped with the CR and VE values ​​for the measurement model were 0.873 and 0.213, while the CR and VE values ​​ for the structural model were 0.956 and 0.880. The final academic anxiety questionnaire contains 27 items with a modified Likert scale (four choices).","PeriodicalId":262250,"journal":{"name":"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONTENT VALIDITY AND CONSTRUCT VALIDITY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACADEMIC ANXIETY QUESTIONNAIRE\",\"authors\":\"Ahsanul Khair Asdar, Muawanah Muawanah\",\"doi\":\"10.21009/jisae.v7i2.25889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was a research and development which aimed to develop an academic anxiety questionnaire for students through content validity and construct validity testing using ADDIE model. This research involved 205 students in the first trial phase and 220 students in the second trial phase. They were selected using the cluster random sampling method. The data were collected using a survey method by distributing the questionnaires using the google form. The results showed that the academic anxiety questionnaire was developed by containing the dimensions of cognitive symptoms, emotional symptoms, and physical symptoms. The coefficient of content validity through the Aiken's V by four experts for each item was more than 0.200, while the reliability was 0.893. The first trial phase showed that eight items dropped through the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with Construct Reliability (CR) and Variance Extracted (VE) values ​​for each measurement model were 0.881 and 0.202, while the CR and VE values for the structural model ​​were 0.888 and 0.730. The second trial phase showed that four items dropped with the CR and VE values ​​for the measurement model were 0.873 and 0.213, while the CR and VE values ​​ for the structural model were 0.956 and 0.880. The final academic anxiety questionnaire contains 27 items with a modified Likert scale (four choices).\",\"PeriodicalId\":262250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.v7i2.25889\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.v7i2.25889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过内容效度编制学生学业焦虑问卷,并利用ADDIE模型构建效度检验。这项研究在第一阶段涉及205名学生,在第二阶段涉及220名学生。采用整群随机抽样方法选取。数据收集采用调查法,使用谷歌表格分发问卷。结果表明,学业焦虑问卷的编制包含认知症状、情绪症状和身体症状三个维度。4位专家通过Aiken's V对各条目的内容效度系数均大于0.200,信度系数为0.893。第一阶段试验表明,通过验证性因子分析(CFA),每个测量模型的构造信度(CR)和方差提取(VE)值分别为0.881和0.202,而结构模型的CR和VE值分别为0.888和0.730。第二阶段试验显示,4个项目下降,测量模型的CR和VE值分别为0.873和0.213,结构模型的CR和VE值分别为0.956和0.880。最终的学业焦虑问卷包含27个条目,采用修改后的李克特量表(4个选项)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CONTENT VALIDITY AND CONSTRUCT VALIDITY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACADEMIC ANXIETY QUESTIONNAIRE
This study was a research and development which aimed to develop an academic anxiety questionnaire for students through content validity and construct validity testing using ADDIE model. This research involved 205 students in the first trial phase and 220 students in the second trial phase. They were selected using the cluster random sampling method. The data were collected using a survey method by distributing the questionnaires using the google form. The results showed that the academic anxiety questionnaire was developed by containing the dimensions of cognitive symptoms, emotional symptoms, and physical symptoms. The coefficient of content validity through the Aiken's V by four experts for each item was more than 0.200, while the reliability was 0.893. The first trial phase showed that eight items dropped through the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with Construct Reliability (CR) and Variance Extracted (VE) values ​​for each measurement model were 0.881 and 0.202, while the CR and VE values for the structural model ​​were 0.888 and 0.730. The second trial phase showed that four items dropped with the CR and VE values ​​for the measurement model were 0.873 and 0.213, while the CR and VE values ​​ for the structural model were 0.956 and 0.880. The final academic anxiety questionnaire contains 27 items with a modified Likert scale (four choices).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信