“你能信任我吗?”评估协作式自动驾驶的可信度人机界面

J. Peintner, Carina Manger, A. Riener
{"title":"“你能信任我吗?”评估协作式自动驾驶的可信度人机界面","authors":"J. Peintner, Carina Manger, A. Riener","doi":"10.1145/3543174.3546976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"First concepts for cooperative driving already illustrate the potential of the cooperation between human drivers and automated vehicles. However, the main influencing factors that determine an efficient and effective cooperation still need to be investigated. We therefore examined the effects of displaying the vehicle’s intended decision in a critical situation in combination with a confidence value. In a driving simulator study (N=49), the automated vehicle communicated uncertainty in predicting the behavior of a pedestrian and the participants could support the automation by entering their own decision to stop or drive through. The results show that the time until entering the own decision (system override) was longer when a pending system decision was indicated with a confidence value in the HMI. A low confidence value resulted in the longest interaction times. In addition, trust in automation and usability were lower compared to the baseline cooperative HMI without a confidence value.","PeriodicalId":284749,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Can you rely on me?” Evaluating a Confidence HMI for Cooperative, Automated Driving\",\"authors\":\"J. Peintner, Carina Manger, A. Riener\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3543174.3546976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"First concepts for cooperative driving already illustrate the potential of the cooperation between human drivers and automated vehicles. However, the main influencing factors that determine an efficient and effective cooperation still need to be investigated. We therefore examined the effects of displaying the vehicle’s intended decision in a critical situation in combination with a confidence value. In a driving simulator study (N=49), the automated vehicle communicated uncertainty in predicting the behavior of a pedestrian and the participants could support the automation by entering their own decision to stop or drive through. The results show that the time until entering the own decision (system override) was longer when a pending system decision was indicated with a confidence value in the HMI. A low confidence value resulted in the longest interaction times. In addition, trust in automation and usability were lower compared to the baseline cooperative HMI without a confidence value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3546976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3546976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

合作驾驶的第一个概念已经说明了人类驾驶员和自动驾驶汽车之间合作的潜力。然而,决定高效和有效合作的主要影响因素仍需加以研究。因此,我们研究了在危急情况下结合置信度值显示车辆预期决策的效果。在一项驾驶模拟器研究中(N=49),自动驾驶车辆在预测行人行为时传达了不确定性,参与者可以通过输入自己的决定来支持自动驾驶,是停车还是开车通过。结果表明,当在HMI中用置信度值表示待处理的系统决策时,进入自己的决策(系统覆盖)的时间更长。置信度越低,交互时间越长。此外,与没有置信度值的基准合作HMI相比,对自动化和可用性的信任度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Can you rely on me?” Evaluating a Confidence HMI for Cooperative, Automated Driving
First concepts for cooperative driving already illustrate the potential of the cooperation between human drivers and automated vehicles. However, the main influencing factors that determine an efficient and effective cooperation still need to be investigated. We therefore examined the effects of displaying the vehicle’s intended decision in a critical situation in combination with a confidence value. In a driving simulator study (N=49), the automated vehicle communicated uncertainty in predicting the behavior of a pedestrian and the participants could support the automation by entering their own decision to stop or drive through. The results show that the time until entering the own decision (system override) was longer when a pending system decision was indicated with a confidence value in the HMI. A low confidence value resulted in the longest interaction times. In addition, trust in automation and usability were lower compared to the baseline cooperative HMI without a confidence value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信